[StarCluster] Best practice query?
Nik Krumm
nkrumm at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 20:02:44 EST 2014
Hi Lyn,
How about using the SGE plugin (this one [1] not the baked-in setup) and a simple script-runner plugin (see [2] for the one I use), but having the SGE plugin last in the order. That way the setup script should run first, and then SGE will be configured second.
I have not tested this approach but in principal it will work.
So a sample config snippet:
[cluster smallcluster]
# don't use baked-in SGE
disable_queue = True
# the order matters here
plugins = scriptrunner, sge
[plugin sge]
setup_class = starcluster.plugins.sge.SGEPlugin
master_is_exec_host = False
[plugin scriptrunner]
setup_class = scriptrunner.ScriptRunner
# note this is the path on the cluster itself, e.g., NFS drive.
node_startup_script = /path/to/script
Good luck,
Nik
[1] http://star.mit.edu/cluster/docs/latest/plugins/sge.html
[2] https://gist.github.com/nkrumm/8292905
On Jan 6, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Lyn Gerner wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I need to make node-resource-specific SGE config changes everytime I add a new node. To avoid race conditions, I need to bring the node up in a disabled state, make the changes, then enable it for running jobs.
>
> I don't see a way to do this with StarCluster commands or config settings. Maybe I missed something.
>
> Could I get a best practice suggestion for how to achieve that set of interactions? I don't want to hack the SGE plugin if there's a better way.
>
> Thanks,
> Lyn
> _______________________________________________
> StarCluster mailing list
> StarCluster at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/starcluster
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/starcluster/attachments/20140106/76db1a28/attachment.htm
More information about the StarCluster
mailing list