All Workflows going into Error Status

[Lalitha Sankaran]

Hi Mike,

Basis confirmed that they ran SGEN, but not sure why the business
objects were not generted by the ID they use for SGEN. Its still a
mystery as to how each BO has a different user ID.

Thank you
Lalitha

On 12/27/13, Mike Pokraka <wug at workflowconnections.com> wrote:
> SGEN - usually Basis would run this after a major patch or upgrade.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> On Mon, December 23, 2013 11:01 pm, Lalitha Sankaran wrote:
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> If it happened to one or 2 objects, I understand, but for all objects ?
>> Could it be due to the SP ? and shd we try to generate all the
>> business objects using a universal program, or some tcode to avoid
>> this issue ?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Lalitha
>>
>> On 12/23/13, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> It could be that a transport changed a piece of shared code. When the
>>> BOR
>>> object was next accessed, it was regenerated.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Rick Bakker
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 23, 2013, Lalitha Sankaran wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The issue is resolved, after a few Business objects were regenerated.
>>>> But we are seeing that most of the Business objects were regenerated
>>>> by different user ID's.
>>>> And these user ID's do not even have access to SWO1, so any idea why
>>>> we have different ID's showing up as the last user ID to have
>>>> generated the business object ?
>>>>
>>>> Any input would help.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Lalitha
>>>>
>>>> On 12/19/13, Lalitha Sankaran <lalisan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > SAP came back and said that the ADDRESS Object was inconsistent and
>>>> > they have regenerated it in our system (though I did this yesterday
>>>> > and that did'nt help ). I tested by restarting one leave request WF
>>>> > and it seemed to go thru, So have scheduled a job for the program
>>>> > RSWP_RESTART_WORKFLOWS_GRID to restart any WF in error. Will update
>>>> if
>>>> > it works.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> > Lalitha
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 12/18/13, Goudham Vel <goudhamvel.88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> Hi lalitha,
>>>> >> Check for agent assignment in basic data of workflow and send mail
>>>> >> step.
>>>> >> Execute swo2 once in prd sys...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >> Goudham
>>>> >> On Dec 19, 2013 6:07 AM, "Lalitha Sankaran" <lalisan at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hi Rick,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> It has SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW in both the systems.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The WF that is failing in Production is working fine in QA system.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks
>>>> >>> Lalitha
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On 12/18/13, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> > Hi Lalitha,
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > I would compare WF-BATCH between Production and QA. Does it have
>>>> >>> > SAP_ALL
>>>> >>> > and SAP_NEW?
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > regards
>>>> >>> > Rick Bakker
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Lalitha Sankaran
>>>> >>> > <lalisan at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >> Hi Rick,
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> This is happening to all tasks , not just email tasks. That was
>>>> >>> >> just
>>>> >>> >> one example. Its happening for all WF's, which is complicating
>>>> it
>>>> >>> >> further.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> SWU3 looks fine, SWETYPV looks fine.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Am having it tested in the QA system.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Thank you
>>>> >>> >> Lalitha
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> On 12/18/13, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> >> > Hi Lalitha,
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > It depends what version you're on. If it's working fine in QA
>>>> >>> >> > then
>>>> >>> >> > I
>>>> >>> >> would
>>>> >>> >> > leave it - but that depends on how well the SP was tested!
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > You should check the workflow log for more details of that
>>>> error
>>>> >>> >> > message
>>>> >>> >> > for the mail. Does it happen to every email from Workflow?
>>>> >>> >> > Are emails sent to users or Positions or both? Does WF-BATCH
>>>> >>> >> > have
>>>> >>> >> > an
>>>> >>> >> email
>>>> >>> >> > address?
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > regards
>>>> >>> >> > Rick Bakker
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lalitha Sankaran
>>>> >>> >> > <lalisan at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >> Hi Rick,
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >> I see that one of the Business Object has the Interface
>>>> IFGOSASERV
>>>> >>> >> >> ,
>>>> >>> >> >> shd I replace this with IFGOSXSERV ?
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >> I can try that, but we never had any issues in the dev or QA
>>>> >>> >> >> system,
>>>> >>> >> >> but will have them test again.
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >> Also the email is going thru from SAP, I sent myself a test
>>>> >>> >> >> email
>>>> >>> >> >> and
>>>> >>> >> >> received it too...
>>>> >>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>