Workflow - Table or Report? [Scanned]

Dart, Jocelyn jocelyn.dart at sap.com
Wed Nov 13 17:04:00 EST 2013 

There are also WAPIs if you want to find workflows used in say the last year. Its a matter of whether you are looking for active workflows or workflows in use - not always the same thing
Rgds
J

Sent from my iPhone with many apologies for the spelling, grammar and any other deficiencies

On 14 Nov 2013, at 12:34 am, "stephane" <s.bailleul at free.fr<mailto:s.bailleul at free.fr>> wrote:

Hi Jocelyn,

May be checking also SWI1 with type F on a period of time could provide workflow that are not triggered by event ?
Because in SWETYPV I think we only get the active event but not all the workflow running  no ?

Regards
Stephane

Le mardi 12 novembre 2013 à 17:40 -0500, sap-wug-request at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu> a écrit :

Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
        sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        sap-wug-request at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>

You can reach the person managing the list at
        sap-wug-owner at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-owner at mit.edu>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Workflow - Table or Report?  [Scanned] (Dart, Jocelyn)
   2. Re: UWL Portal Buttons User Specific Issues (Dart, Jocelyn)
   3. Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 108, Issue 5 (Dart, Jocelyn)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:53:33 +0000
From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com<mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com>>
Subject: Re: Workflow - Table or Report?  [Scanned]
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Cc: "SAP Workflow Users' Group (sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>)" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Message-ID: <C93656E4-CF04-4B04-B4F3-82E48F0182EE at sap.com<mailto:C93656E4-CF04-4B04-B4F3-82E48F0182EE at sap.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Hi Vijay
Try transaction SWETYPV and the tables underlying that to get a count of active wflows. Custom wflows start with WS9. Application vs process controlled is a SRM distinction that has no meaning elsewhere
Rgds
J


Sent from my iPhone with many apologies for the spelling, grammar and any other deficiencies

On 13 Nov 2013, at 1:27 am, "Vijayendra K. Rao (Absoft)" <vrao at absoft.co.uk<mailto:vrao at absoft.co.uk><mailto:vrao at absoft.co.uk>> wrote:

Hi,

Is there a way to determine the number of workflows( standard and Custom built ) and the different types of workflows available in the system? I mean I would like to know if there is any standard query or Table which holds the number of active workflows in a customer?s system and also a way to determine how many of them are process-controlled workflows and how many of them are application-controlled workflows?

Regards,
Vijay

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu><mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131112/e6c0c248/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:55:51 +0000
From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com<mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com>>
Subject: Re: UWL Portal Buttons User Specific Issues
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Cc: "sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Message-ID: <030DB407-10B6-4112-AD3D-95C1557016C6 at sap.com<mailto:030DB407-10B6-4112-AD3D-95C1557016C6 at sap.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Colm have you checked if they have any UWL personalizations active? That might be overriding your changes.
Rgds
J

Sent from my iPhone with many apologies for the spelling, grammar and any other deficiencies

On 12 Nov 2013, at 10:34 pm, "Colm.Gavin at kerry.ie<mailto:Colm.Gavin at kerry.ie><mailto:Colm.Gavin at kerry.ie>" <Colm.Gavin at kerry.ie<mailto:Colm.Gavin at kerry.ie><mailto:Colm.Gavin at kerry.ie>> wrote:

Hi Guys,

We have a WF task that we have completed the XML configuration for so that we have the Approve\Reject buttons and a comment box appearing on the portal. This works for most users but not for all and we can't identify what the difference is, we have replicated the issue in our test system and have provided SAP_ALL and Portal_Admin roles to the user but they still can't see the buttons.

We've logged in with a user that works and one that doesn't on the same machine and still the problem remains so that rules it out as being an IE issue.

Has anyone seen anything similar? Any help much appreciated.

Thanks!
Colm

_____________________________________
Colm Gavin
ABAP Team Lead
Kerry Group
Kerryconnect Programme Office
Crowne Plaza Dublin Northwood Hotel
Santry, Dublin 9
Ireland

e-Mail: colm.gavin at kerry.ie<mailto:colm.gavin at kerry.ie><mailto:colm.gavin at kerry.ie>

***************************************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited and may be unlawful. Kerry Group accepts no liability for actions or effects
based on the prohibited usage of this information. Kerry Group is not liable for the
proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication or
for any delay in its receipt. If you received this in error, please contact the sender
and delete the material from any computer.

Thank you for your attention.
***************************************************************************************


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu><mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131112/9a2918c6/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:40:39 +0000
From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com<mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com>>
Subject: Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 108, Issue 5
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Message-ID: <DC4FDE2C-3809-4974-82FB-1055A65965BD at sap.com<mailto:DC4FDE2C-3809-4974-82FB-1055A65965BD at sap.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Check your own auths - do you have SAP_ALL & are you in the logon group SUPER ?

Sent from my iPhone with many apologies for the spelling, grammar and any other deficiencies

On 11 Nov 2013, at 2:34 pm, "Naveen Kusuma" <naveen.kk99 at gmail.com<mailto:naveen.kk99 at gmail.com><mailto:naveen.kk99 at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi,

May be WF-BATCH password has changed, so try with new password and execute the Configure RFC destination node.

Thanks,
Naveen

Thanks,
Naveen Kumar


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:48 PM, <sap-wug-request at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>> wrote:
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
        sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        sap-wug-request at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>

You can reach the person managing the list at
        sap-wug-owner at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-owner at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug-owner at mit.edu>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. SWU3 Initial Workflow Config (John Haworth)
   2. RE: SWU3 Initial Workflow Config (Hoodak, Anthony J.)
   3. RE: SWU3 Initial Workflow Config (Morris, Eddie)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:15:02 +0000
From: John Haworth <jhaworth at csc.com<mailto:jhaworth at csc.com><mailto:jhaworth at csc.com>>
Subject: SWU3 Initial Workflow Config
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Message-ID:
        <OF45D501D8.547A7942-ON80257C1C.0055A83F-80257C1D.002D8BCF at csc.com<mailto:OF45D501D8.547A7942-ON80257C1C.0055A83F-80257C1D.002D8BCF at csc.com><mailto:OF45D501D8.547A7942-ON80257C1C.0055A83F-80257C1D.002D8BCF at csc.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi

I have done this many many times before....

A really basic question, but its beating me :-(

I am in a new SRM 7.0 environment

A few days ago I successfully ran the auto config, SWU3, wf-batch and the
logical destination, ok.

Now I come to it and 'Configure RFC destination' has a red cross, I try
and execute it, it fails, message telling me the Synchronization of
Passwords Failed.

I have tried deleting and re-creating, wf-batch and logical destination
(automatically)

Still i get the 'Synchronization of Passwords failed'

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Kind Regards

John Haworth
SAP PDM
CSC

Euxton House, Euxton Lane, Chorley, PR7 6FE.
|Office: +44(0)1257 23 6474<tel:%2B44%280%291257%2023%206474>|Mobile: +44(0)7921069650<tel:%2B44%280%297921069650>| email:
jhaworth at csc.com<mailto:jhaworth at csc.com><mailto:jhaworth at csc.com>|www.csc.com<http://www.csc.com><http://www.csc.com>

=============================================
Advanced Holiday Notice:

=============================================

CSC ? This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the
mistake in delivery.  NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not
operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to
explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting
the use of e-mail for such purpose ? CSC Computer Sciences Limited ?
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK ? Registered in England No: 0963578

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131108/28d5a0f7/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 03:31:10 -0500
From: "Hoodak, Anthony J." <AHoodak at gleason.com<mailto:AHoodak at gleason.com><mailto:AHoodak at gleason.com>>
Subject: RE: SWU3 Initial Workflow Config
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Message-ID:
        <2121B71222518246BA4ED62B7059ACB70470E3A7 at GEXCHANGE.rochester.inetgleason.com<mailto:2121B71222518246BA4ED62B7059ACB70470E3A7 at GEXCHANGE.rochester.inetgleason.com><mailto:2121B71222518246BA4ED62B7059ACB70470E3A7 at GEXCHANGE.rochester.inetgleason.com>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

John ?



I believe this has to do with WF-BATCH has a password which is set up to require a password change every XXX number of days (and it apparently has changed)? I would see your Basis person or Security person to see how the user WF-BATCH is configured.



Tony



From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>] On Behalf Of John Haworth
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 3:15 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: SWU3 Initial Workflow Config



Hi

I have done this many many times before....

A really basic question, but its beating me :-(

I am in a new SRM 7.0 environment

A few days ago I successfully ran the auto config, SWU3, wf-batch and the logical destination, ok.

Now I come to it and 'Configure RFC destination' has a red cross, I try and execute it, it fails, message telling me the Synchronization of Passwords Failed.

I have tried deleting and re-creating, wf-batch and logical destination (automatically)

Still i get the 'Synchronization of Passwords failed'

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Kind Regards

John Haworth
SAP PDM
CSC

Euxton House, Euxton Lane, Chorley, PR7 6FE.
|Office: +44(0)1257 23 6474|Mobile: +44(0)7921069650| email: jhaworth at csc.com<mailto:jhaworth at csc.com><mailto:jhaworth at csc.com>|www.csc.com<http://www.csc.com><http://www.csc.com>

=============================================
Advanced Holiday Notice:

=============================================

CSC ? This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery.  NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose ? CSC Computer Sciences Limited ? Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire, GU11 1PZ, UK ? Registered in England No: 0963578

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131108/389c9515/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:18:12 +0000
From: "Morris, Eddie" <eddie.morris at sap.com<mailto:eddie.morris at sap.com><mailto:eddie.morris at sap.com>>
Subject: RE: SWU3 Initial Workflow Config
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Message-ID:
        <5430ED4ACAC12B4484E5A931D8F5C37A8E3D0959 at DEWDFEMB17A.global.corp.sap<mailto:5430ED4ACAC12B4484E5A931D8F5C37A8E3D0959 at DEWDFEMB17A.global.corp.sap><mailto:5430ED4ACAC12B4484E5A931D8F5C37A8E3D0959 at DEWDFEMB17A.global.corp.sap>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi John,

Make sure your user has sufficient authorisation e.g. WF Admin and Basis Admin at least.

They try again.

Regards,
Eddie

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu><mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>] On Behalf Of John Haworth
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 8:15 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: SWU3 Initial Workflow Config

Hi

I have done this many many times before....

A really basic question, but its beating me :-(

I am in a new SRM 7.0 environment

A few days ago I successfully ran the auto config, SWU3, wf-batch and the logical destination, ok.

Now I come to it and 'Configure RFC destination' has a red cross, I try and execute it, it fails, message telling me the Synchronization of Passwords Failed.

I have tried deleting and re-creating, wf-batch and logical destination (automatically)

Still i get the 'Synchronization of Passwords failed'

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Kind Regards

John Haworth
SAP PDM
CSC

Euxton House, Euxton Lane, Chorley, PR7 6FE.
|Office: +44(0)1257 23 6474|Mobile: +44(0)7921069650| email: jhaworth at csc.com<mailto:jhaworth at csc.com><mailto:jhaworth at csc.com>|www.csc.com<http://www.csc.com><http://www.csc.com><mailto:jhaworth at csc.com<mailto:jhaworth at csc.com>|www.csc.com<http://www.csc.com><http://www.csc.com>>

=============================================
Advanced Holiday Notice:

=============================================

CSC ? This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery.  NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose ? CSC Computer Sciences Limited ? Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire, GU11 1PZ, UK ? Registered in England No: 0963578
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131108/4bea015f/attachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu><mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 108, Issue 5
***************************************

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu><mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131112/bd6c0109/attachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 108, Issue 10
****************************************


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131113/f3e10204/attachment-0001.htm

More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list