All Workflows going into Error Status

[Lalitha Sankaran]

Hi Rick,

If it happened to one or 2 objects, I understand, but for all objects ?
Could it be due to the SP ? and shd we try to generate all the
business objects using a universal program, or some tcode to avoid
this issue ?

Thank you
Lalitha

On 12/23/13, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It could be that a transport changed a piece of shared code. When the BOR
> object was next accessed, it was regenerated.
>
> Regards
> Rick Bakker
>
> On Monday, December 23, 2013, Lalitha Sankaran wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The issue is resolved, after a few Business objects were regenerated.
>> But we are seeing that most of the Business objects were regenerated
>> by different user ID's.
>> And these user ID's do not even have access to SWO1, so any idea why
>> we have different ID's showing up as the last user ID to have
>> generated the business object ?
>>
>> Any input would help.
>>
>> Thank you
>> Lalitha
>>
>> On 12/19/13, Lalitha Sankaran <lalisan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > SAP came back and said that the ADDRESS Object was inconsistent and
>> > they have regenerated it in our system (though I did this yesterday
>> > and that did'nt help ). I tested by restarting one leave request WF
>> > and it seemed to go thru, So have scheduled a job for the program
>> > RSWP_RESTART_WORKFLOWS_GRID to restart any WF in error. Will update if
>> > it works.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Lalitha
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12/18/13, Goudham Vel <goudhamvel.88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi lalitha,
>> >> Check for agent assignment in basic data of workflow and send mail
>> >> step.
>> >> Execute swo2 once in prd sys...
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Goudham
>> >> On Dec 19, 2013 6:07 AM, "Lalitha Sankaran" <lalisan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Rick,
>> >>>
>> >>> It has SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW in both the systems.
>> >>>
>> >>> The WF that is failing in Production is working fine in QA system.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Lalitha
>> >>>
>> >>> On 12/18/13, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi Lalitha,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I would compare WF-BATCH between Production and QA. Does it have
>> >>> > SAP_ALL
>> >>> > and SAP_NEW?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > regards
>> >>> > Rick Bakker
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Lalitha Sankaran
>> >>> > <lalisan at gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Hi Rick,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> This is happening to all tasks , not just email tasks. That was
>> >>> >> just
>> >>> >> one example. Its happening for all WF's, which is complicating it
>> >>> >> further.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> SWU3 looks fine, SWETYPV looks fine.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Am having it tested in the QA system.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Thank you
>> >>> >> Lalitha
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On 12/18/13, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Hi Lalitha,
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > It depends what version you're on. If it's working fine in QA
>> >>> >> > then
>> >>> >> > I
>> >>> >> would
>> >>> >> > leave it - but that depends on how well the SP was tested!
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > You should check the workflow log for more details of that error
>> >>> >> > message
>> >>> >> > for the mail. Does it happen to every email from Workflow?
>> >>> >> > Are emails sent to users or Positions or both? Does WF-BATCH
>> >>> >> > have
>> >>> >> > an
>> >>> >> email
>> >>> >> > address?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > regards
>> >>> >> > Rick Bakker
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lalitha Sankaran
>> >>> >> > <lalisan at gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> Hi Rick,
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I see that one of the Business Object has the Interface
>> IFGOSASERV
>> >>> >> >> ,
>> >>> >> >> shd I replace this with IFGOSXSERV ?
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I can try that, but we never had any issues in the dev or QA
>> >>> >> >> system,
>> >>> >> >> but will have them test again.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Also the email is going thru from SAP, I sent myself a test
>> >>> >> >> email
>> >>> >> >> and
>> >>> >> >> received it too...
>> >>>
>