Responsibility Rule - PP01 / PFAC

Sample, Rick Rick.Sample at graybar.com
Thu Sep 13 15:06:13 EDT 2012


Yes. 110 / 120 same system. Dev / Test.

Been a while since I looked at this type of role res and should have had my notes in hand but
I was in a hurry. <blush> Just testing stuff do to upgrade to ecc6.

I created a rule via PFAC to use an "Agent Determination: Responsibilities".
I went to 120 and rule was there as expected but not RY (Responsibility).
I manually forced a customizing transport for RY and SCC1'd it over.

I don't recall this not prompting me for a transport before upgrade but that was a LONG time ago.
Works fine. User error...

Thanks Mike / Kyle,
Rick

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Kyle McCarter
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 13:34
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: RE: Responsibility Rule - PP01 / PFAC

NOTE - Of course my below comments imply that clients 110 and 120 are part of the same instance. :)

I'm not clear as to what you are not seeing in client 120.

While Rules themselves are client independent, the Responsibilities are NOT. Definitely the Rule should be visible via PFAC or PP01. However, if you maintained Responsibilities, you will need to transport or use transaction SCC1 to pull the Responsibilities from 110 to 120.

As for maintaining the Rule's Responsibilities via PP01, I believe there is some basic customization required that will determine which Infotypes are available for your various organization objects (like Rules, Org, Units, Positions, etc).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120913/dcdaabe4/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list