Workflow changes in EHP6

[George Caramaliu]

Hi,
I checked and all container elements have valid data elements, in fact some container elements have values, so there is nothing wrong with the data definition. Pfiu... crappy error message... 




________________________________
 From: Mike Gambier <madgambler at hotmail.com>
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu> 
Cc: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu> 
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2012 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Workflow changes in EHP6
 

George,

We noticed that SAP withdrew (i.e. deleted) a few of their own structures without warning and that tripped us up at the time. 

My advice would be to revisit your binding and adjust the definitions. You may find you have to find or create alternative data types to support the changes. 

Any runtime instances that have been affected that you want to keep rather than kill you'll have to perform surgery on in tables like SWDSWFCONT and repoint the bindings to valid types supported by the data dictionary post-upgrade. 

Mike GT

Sent from my iPhone

On 8 Oct 2012, at 12:35, "George Caramaliu" <george_caramaliu at yahoo.com> wrote:


Hi,
>
>We already have this note applied. Anyway, we have the same error also for simple container elements (structures), not only for BOR objects.
>If I use the check bindings function in the workflow builder I do not have any error. This is strange. 
>
>
>
>George
>
>
>________________________________
> From: "Morris, Eddie" <eddie.morris at sap.com>
>To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu> 
>Sent: Monday, October 8, 2012 1:54 PM
>Subject: RE: Workflow changes in EHP6
> 
>
>Hi George,
> 
>In relation to binding issue please apply note 1696315 if not already in the system. It is a BOR related note.
> 
>Regards,
>Eddie
> 
>From:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of George Caramaliu
>Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:01 AM
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Subject: Workflow changes in EHP6
> 
>Hello,
> 
>We are currently testing the upgrade to EHP6 and we have some problems with our already developed workflows.
>it seems that there are significant changes in workflow runtime classes, a lot of our enhancements are failing because standard attributes were deleted and we have to change the code. Now we found other problems in WF execution and errors during binding ("Source expression & invalid" when passing an empty object).
> 
>Can anyone provide a document/link with the changes done by EHP6 in workflow area? I was not able to find it.  
> 
>Thank you,
>George Caramaliu
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20121009/a5cab2b0/attachment.htm