Substitution restriction list

Mike Pokraka wug at workflowconnections.com
Thu Jun 28 05:35:08 EDT 2012


G'Day,

The BADI is WF_SUBSTITUTE but it's only for the UWL substitution dialog.
Given that you're on SRM this will probably work for you.

Regards,
Mike


On Thu, June 28, 2012 9:53 am, stephane wrote:
> Hello,
>
> General question around the substitute, is there a BADI to control the
> list of possible sustitute available to someone ?
> I am not talking about a specific task but for instance I want someone
> to provide the susbtitution to only someone within the hierarchy which
> is at the same level or above ?
>
> I would like to apply this in SRM one client (RDS - SRM 7)
> My main goal would be to use the BRF workflow but due to the complexity
> I could go back to the old n step badi workflow
>
> Cheers
> Stephane
>
>
> Le mardi 26 juin 2012 à 00:28 -0400, sap-wug-request at mit.edu a écrit :
>
>> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>> 	sap-wug at mit.edu
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> 	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> 	sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> 	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Mike Pokraka)
>>    2. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Shaurya Jain)
>>    3. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Mike Pokraka)
>>    4. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Shaurya Jain)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:29:03 +0100
>> From: Mike Pokraka <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> Message-ID:
>> 	<AF6F988D-C6B6-4410-9DD7-71FCB762DB1F at workflowconnections.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Error message?
>>
>> On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Experts,
>>
>> We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
>>
>> Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following areas:
>>
>> They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item is not
>> getting removed from their inbox.
>> PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get triggered for
>> the CREATE event.
>> PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem not
>> delievered to next responsible agent.
>> and many more like this.......
>> Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go fine.
>>
>> When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in error
>> in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually execute
>> these LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity for
>> database update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a
>> workaround to resolve the problem temporarily.
>>
>> But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem. Even my
>> Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking the
>> System Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values
>> for parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt Interval
>> [Mins] is set to 15.
>>
>> If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really great.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shaurya Jain
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/74da4b73/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:59:48 +0300
>> From: Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> Message-ID:
>> 	<CAFALVOOfFi7dxNu7Q5eumOFeA+ECP2Aq_pL0+wvBx6Z_aLaUpg at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> DB Error -9999
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shaurya
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Error message?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Experts,
>> >
>> > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
>> >
>> > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following areas:
>> >
>> > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item is not
>> getting removed from their inbox.
>> > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get triggered for
>> the CREATE event.
>> > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem not
>> delievered to next responsible agent.
>> > and many more like this.......
>> > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go
>> fine.
>> >
>> > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in error
>> in
>> SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually execute these
>> LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity for
>> database
>> update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a workaround to
>> resolve the problem temporarily.
>> >
>> > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem. Even
>> my
>> Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking the
>> System
>> Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values for
>> parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt Interval
>> [Mins]
>> is set to 15.
>> >
>> > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
>> great.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Shaurya Jain
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/4a435e09/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:49:53 +0100
>> From: Mike Pokraka <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> Message-ID:
>> 	<7A53075A-C7F1-4AF1-A86C-0EB85E10DB54 at workflowconnections.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> That sounds very much like a basis problem. Same error, different
>> transactions...
>>
>> Check the system log around the time of the transaction (SM21), also
>> maybe have a look for update errors (SM13). Very surprised basis can't
>> help you further, might be worth another chat.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:59, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> DB Error -9999
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shaurya
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Error message?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Experts,
>> >
>> > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
>> >
>> > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following areas:
>> >
>> > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item is not
>> getting removed from their inbox.
>> > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get triggered for
>> the CREATE event.
>> > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem not
>> delievered to next responsible agent.
>> > and many more like this.......
>> > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go
>> fine.
>> >
>> > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in error
>> in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually execute
>> these LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity
>> for database update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a
>> workaround to resolve the problem temporarily.
>> >
>> > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem. Even
>> my Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking the
>> System Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values
>> for parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt
>> Interval [Mins] is set to 15.
>> >
>> > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
>> great.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Shaurya Jain
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/f9c95eef/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:28:07 +0300
>> From: Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> Message-ID:
>> 	<CAFALVONy_J17YHEVHk=ZPsaK4yKqGYWge1AeVPO6By34BY_C=Q at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Thanks Susan & Mike for responding.
>>
>> I will get in touch with the Basis team again & will update the forum
>> with
>> solution.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shaurya Jain
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Mike Pokraka
>> <wug at workflowconnections.com>wrote:
>>
>> > That sounds very much like a basis problem. Same error, different
>> > transactions...
>> >
>> > Check the system log around the time of the transaction (SM21), also
>> maybe
>> > have a look for update errors (SM13). Very surprised basis can't help
>> you
>> > further, might be worth another chat.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Mike
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:59, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > DB Error -9999
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Shaurya
>> >
>> > On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Error message?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Dear Experts,
>> > >
>> > > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
>> > >
>> > > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following areas:
>> > >
>> > > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item is
>> not
>> > getting removed from their inbox.
>> > > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get triggered
>> for
>> > the CREATE event.
>> > > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem
>> not
>> > delievered to next responsible agent.
>> > > and many more like this.......
>> > > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go
>> fine.
>> > >
>> > > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in
>> error
>> > in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually execute
>> these
>> > LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity for
>> database
>> > update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a workaround
>> to
>> > resolve the problem temporarily.
>> > >
>> > > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem.
>> Even my
>> > Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking the
>> System
>> > Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values for
>> > parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt Interval
>> [Mins]
>> > is set to 15.
>> > >
>> > > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
>> great.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Shaurya Jain
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120626/0667fc97/attachment.htm
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>>
>> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 91, Issue 26
>> ***************************************
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>




More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list