SRM BRF

Tue Jul 3 08:39:21 EDT 2012

Hi Ramki 
Thanks for your answer

7.02 is necessary for BRF+, however I am not sure for SRM ... BRF and
BRF + can live together on the same system all the coding is separated.
So evenif BRF+ is allowed in an SRM system I am not sure that the
standard workflow will be affected.

Mike, Yes I do remember working on an EBP 3.0 with workflow, the java
display was not able to read a simple loop so you had to make as many
workflow template as you could have approval step if you wanted it to be
displayed nicely to the end user.... 

Cheers
Stephane

Le mardi 03 juillet 2012 à 08:21 -0400, sap-wug-request at mit.edu a
écrit :

> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> 	sap-wug at mit.edu
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: SRM BRF Workflow (Ramki Maley)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:21:39 -0400
> From: Ramki Maley <rmaley at erpworkflow.com>
> Subject: Re: SRM BRF Workflow
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID: <4FF2E3D3.2010106 at erpworkflow.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Hello Stepahne,
> 
> The workaround for the process controlled BRF workflows is, either find 
> a BAdI or create an implicit enhancement if that is possible.
> There is a BAdI for deadlines. I have done a simple implementation of 
> the BAdI. You will need to come up with the logic to figure out the 
> current process step and set your deadlines accordingly.
> I once had to create an implicit enhancement even in ECC for a some 
> complex substitution rules. So that is an option.
> A while ago I posed the BRF+ question to Carlsten Ziegler of SAP and was 
> told that BRF+ is indeed replacing BRF. I don't remember the the 
> enhancement pack number that it was supposed to become effective.
> 
> Regards,
> Ramki.
> 
> 
> You can
> On 7/3/12 4:08 AM, stephane wrote:
> > Yes Mike good questions,  I have developped a lot of workflow in SRM 
> > mainly wit the N step Badi and it was good time, I do prefer the SRM 
> > workflow than working with the MM release strategy workflow...
> >
> > However from my point of view the BRF workflow in SRM provides issues 
> > with
> >     - Deadline monitoring (you can not set different deadlines for the 
> > different step of your workflow). => they are all using the same task
> >     - Substitution profile, as mentionned before the same tasks is 
> > being used and therefore you can not use different profile
> > BRF seems to be an effort from SAP to make the rule more easy but BRF 
> > + has already made the BRF obsolete so my question to know if there is 
> > a plan to replace the BRF workflow in SRM by BRF+.
> >
> > I am pretty sure that we can change the task ID and therefore being 
> > able to add substitution profile and but I am not 100% sure that I can 
> > do it ...
> >
> > Cheers
> > Stephane
> >
> > Le mardi 03 juillet 2012 ? 01:51 -0400, sap-wug-request at mit.edu a ?crit :
> >> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> >> 	sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> 	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> 	sap-wug-request at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> 	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-owner at mit.edu>
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >>     1. Re: SRM BRF workflow (Ikhan)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:51:08 +0400
> >> From: Ikhan <ikhansap at gmail.com  <mailto:ikhansap at gmail.com>>
> >> Subject: Re: SRM BRF workflow
> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
> >> Message-ID:
> >> 	<CADb5asoJbxyOCuoaQZ3Zf11MoKfiaBKyJszMtZtLrtNa9AuwKw at mail.gmail.com  <mailto:CADb5asoJbxyOCuoaQZ3Zf11MoKfiaBKyJszMtZtLrtNa9AuwKw at mail.gmail.com>>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>    Why did you avoid SRM Workflows. Any Particular reason for it.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mike Pokraka
> >> <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Sorry can't help much with SRM details, worked hard to avoid it most of my
> >> > workflow career.
> >> > If it helps, I once did an enhancement to integrate the BADI into the
> >> > regular sapgui substitution dialog, so if the BADI doesn't work for you
> >> > something similar may also an option for you.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Mike
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, June 29, 2012 8:24 am, stephane wrote:
> >> > > Hi all,
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks, Mike, for your answer, I know this Badi however I am not 100%
> >> > > sure that it will work in my case.
> >> > > SRM one client with a Business All in One CLient without the EC
> >> > > portal ....
> >> > > No other solution wihtout UWL ?
> >> > >
> >> > > I am not yet 100% sure to know how the architecture of this solution
> >> > > works.
> >> > >
> >> > > Some more questions :
> >> > >     - SRM the Processed controled workflow (BRF) how does it work for
> >> > > different substitution profile ? It seems to be the same tasks behing
> >> > > every approval step
> >> > >     - Same question but for deadline monitoriing can we have different
> >> > > time and 'escalation process' depending of the steps ?
> >> > >     - Do you know if those BRF workflow will be replaced by BRFPlus
> >> > > workflow soon ?
> >> > >
> >> > > Cheers
> >> > > Stephane
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 ?  12:16 -0400,sap-wug-request at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>  a ??crit :
> >> > >
> >> > >> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> >> > >>sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> > >>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> > >>sap-wug-request at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> > >>sap-wug-owner at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-owner at mit.edu>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> > >> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Today's Topics:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>    1. Re: Substitution restriction list (Mike Pokraka)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Message: 1
> >> > >> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:35:08 +0100 (BST)
> >> > >> From: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>>
> >> > >> Subject: Re: Substitution restriction list
> >> > >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at MIT.EDU  <mailto:sap-wug at MIT.EDU>>
> >> > >> Message-ID:
> >> > >>      <efe2f511b736d57fb880f8fe2a85582c.squirrel at h.mail.aaisp.net.uk  <mailto:efe2f511b736d57fb880f8fe2a85582c.squirrel at h.mail.aaisp.net.uk>>
> >> > >> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> >> > >>
> >> > >> G'Day,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The BADI is WF_SUBSTITUTE but it's only for the UWL substitution dialog.
> >> > >> Given that you're on SRM this will probably work for you.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Regards,
> >> > >> Mike
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Thu, June 28, 2012 9:53 am, stephane wrote:
> >> > >> > Hello,
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > General question around the substitute, is there a BADI to control the
> >> > >> > list of possible sustitute available to someone ?
> >> > >> > I am not talking about a specific task but for instance I want someone
> >> > >> > to provide the susbtitution to only someone within the hierarchy which
> >> > >> > is at the same level or above ?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I would like to apply this in SRM one client (RDS - SRM 7)
> >> > >> > My main goal would be to use the BRF workflow but due to the
> >> > >> complexity
> >> > >> > I could go back to the old n step badi workflow
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Cheers
> >> > >> > Stephane
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Le mardi 26 juin 2012 ?? 00:28 -0400,sap-wug-request at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>  a
> >> > ??crit
> >> > >> :
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> >> > >> >>sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> > >> >>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> > >> >>sap-wug-request at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> > >> >>sap-wug-owner at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug-owner at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> > >> >> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Today's Topics:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>    1. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Mike Pokraka)
> >> > >> >>    2. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Shaurya Jain)
> >> > >> >>    3. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Mike Pokraka)
> >> > >> >>    4. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Shaurya Jain)
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Message: 1
> >> > >> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:29:03 +0100
> >> > >> >> From: Mike Pokraka <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>>
> >> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
> >> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
> >> > >> >> Message-ID:
> >> > >> >>   <AF6F988D-C6B6-4410-9DD7-71FCB762DB1F at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:AF6F988D-C6B6-4410-9DD7-71FCB762DB1F at workflowconnections.com>>
> >> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Error message?
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Dear Experts,
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following areas:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item is
> >> > >> not
> >> > >> >> getting removed from their inbox.
> >> > >> >> PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get triggered
> >> > >> for
> >> > >> >> the CREATE event.
> >> > >> >> PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem not
> >> > >> >> delievered to next responsible agent.
> >> > >> >> and many more like this.......
> >> > >> >> Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go
> >> > >> fine.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in
> >> > >> error
> >> > >> >> in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually execute
> >> > >> >> these LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity
> >> > >> for
> >> > >> >> database update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a
> >> > >> >> workaround to resolve the problem temporarily.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem. Even
> >> > >> my
> >> > >> >> Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking the
> >> > >> >> System Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values
> >> > >> >> for parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt
> >> > >> Interval
> >> > >> >> [Mins] is set to 15.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
> >> > >> great.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Regards,
> >> > >> >> Shaurya Jain
> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >>SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > >> >> URL:
> >> > >> >>
> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/74da4b73/attachment-0001.htm
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> ------------------------------
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Message: 2
> >> > >> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:59:48 +0300
> >> > >> >> From: Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
> >> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
> >> > >> >> Message-ID:
> >> > >> >>   <
> >> >CAFALVOOfFi7dxNu7Q5eumOFeA+ECP2Aq_pL0+wvBx6Z_aLaUpg at mail.gmail.com  <mailto:CAFALVOOfFi7dxNu7Q5eumOFeA+ECP2Aq_pL0+wvBx6Z_aLaUpg at mail.gmail.com>>
> >> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> DB Error -9999
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Regards,
> >> > >> >> Shaurya
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>
> >> > >
> >> > >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Error message?
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Dear Experts,
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following areas:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item is
> >> > >> not
> >> > >> >> getting removed from their inbox.
> >> > >> >> > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get triggered
> >> > >> for
> >> > >> >> the CREATE event.
> >> > >> >> > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem
> >> > >> not
> >> > >> >> delievered to next responsible agent.
> >> > >> >> > and many more like this.......
> >> > >> >> > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go
> >> > >> >> fine.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in
> >> > >> error
> >> > >> >> in
> >> > >> >> SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually execute
> >> > >> these
> >> > >> >> LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity for
> >> > >> >> database
> >> > >> >> update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a workaround
> >> > >> to
> >> > >> >> resolve the problem temporarily.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem.
> >> > >> Even
> >> > >> >> my
> >> > >> >> Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking the
> >> > >> >> System
> >> > >> >> Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values for
> >> > >> >> parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt Interval
> >> > >> >> [Mins]
> >> > >> >> is set to 15.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
> >> > >> >> great.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Regards,
> >> > >> >> > Shaurya Jain
> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > >> >> URL:
> >> > >> >>
> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/4a435e09/attachment-0001.htm
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> ------------------------------
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Message: 3
> >> > >> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:49:53 +0100
> >> > >> >> From: Mike Pokraka <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>>
> >> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
> >> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
> >> > >> >> Message-ID:
> >> > >> >>   <7A53075A-C7F1-4AF1-A86C-0EB85E10DB54 at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:7A53075A-C7F1-4AF1-A86C-0EB85E10DB54 at workflowconnections.com>>
> >> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> That sounds very much like a basis problem. Same error, different
> >> > >> >> transactions...
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Check the system log around the time of the transaction (SM21), also
> >> > >> >> maybe have a look for update errors (SM13). Very surprised basis
> >> > >> can't
> >> > >> >> help you further, might be worth another chat.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Regards,
> >> > >> >> Mike
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:59, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> DB Error -9999
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Regards,
> >> > >> >> Shaurya
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>
> >> > >
> >> > >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Error message?
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Dear Experts,
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following areas:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item is
> >> > >> not
> >> > >> >> getting removed from their inbox.
> >> > >> >> > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get triggered
> >> > >> for
> >> > >> >> the CREATE event.
> >> > >> >> > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem
> >> > >> not
> >> > >> >> delievered to next responsible agent.
> >> > >> >> > and many more like this.......
> >> > >> >> > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go
> >> > >> >> fine.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in
> >> > >> error
> >> > >> >> in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually execute
> >> > >> >> these LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity
> >> > >> >> for database update happens & things move as they have to. So I have
> >> > >> a
> >> > >> >> workaround to resolve the problem temporarily.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem.
> >> > >> Even
> >> > >> >> my Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> >> System Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values
> >> > >> >> for parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt
> >> > >> >> Interval [Mins] is set to 15.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
> >> > >> >> great.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Regards,
> >> > >> >> > Shaurya Jain
> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >>SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > >> >> URL:
> >> > >> >>
> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/f9c95eef/attachment-0001.htm
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> ------------------------------
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Message: 4
> >> > >> >> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:28:07 +0300
> >> > >> >> From: Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
> >> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu  <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
> >> > >> >> Message-ID:
> >> > >> >>   <CAFALVONy_J17YHEVHk=ZPsaK4yKqGYWge1AeVPO6By34BY_C=
> >> >Q at mail.gmail.com  <mailto:Q at mail.gmail.com>>
> >> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Thanks Susan & Mike for responding.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> I will get in touch with the Basis team again & will update the forum
> >> > >> >> with
> >> > >> >> solution.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Regards,
> >> > >> >> Shaurya Jain
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Mike Pokraka
> >> > >> >> <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>>wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> > That sounds very much like a basis problem. Same error, different
> >> > >> >> > transactions...
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Check the system log around the time of the transaction (SM21),
> >> > >> also
> >> > >> >> maybe
> >> > >> >> > have a look for update errors (SM13). Very surprised basis can't
> >> > >> help
> >> > >> >> you
> >> > >> >> > further, might be worth another chat.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Regards,
> >> > >> >> > Mike
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:59, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > DB Error -9999
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Regards,
> >> > >> >> > Shaurya
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka"
> >> > >> <wug at workflowconnections.com  <mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com>>
> >> > >> >> > wrote:
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > Error message?
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com  <mailto:jain.shaurya at gmail.com>>
> >> > >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > Dear Experts,
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following
> >> > >> areas:
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item
> >> > >> is
> >> > >> >> not
> >> > >> >> > getting removed from their inbox.
> >> > >> >> > > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get
> >> > >> triggered
> >> > >> >> for
> >> > >> >> > the CREATE event.
> >> > >> >> > > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but workitem
> >> > >> >> not
> >> > >> >> > delievered to next responsible agent.
> >> > >> >> > > and many more like this.......
> >> > >> >> > > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things go
> >> > >> >> fine.
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in
> >> > >> >> error
> >> > >> >> > in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually
> >> > >> execute
> >> > >> >> these
> >> > >> >> > LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity for
> >> > >> >> database
> >> > >> >> > update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a
> >> > >> workaround
> >> > >> >> to
> >> > >> >> > resolve the problem temporarily.
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem.
> >> > >> >> Even my
> >> > >> >> > Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking the
> >> > >> >> System
> >> > >> >> > Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values for
> >> > >> >> > parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt Interval
> >> > >> >> [Mins]
> >> > >> >> > is set to 15.
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
> >> > >> >> great.
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >> >> > > Shaurya Jain
> >> > >> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> > >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> > >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> > >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> > >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > >> >> URL:
> >> > >> >>
> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120626/0667fc97/attachment.htm
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> ------------------------------
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >>SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 91, Issue 26
> >> > >> >> ***************************************
> >> > >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> ------------------------------
> >> > >>
> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >>SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 91, Issue 28
> >> > >> ***************************************
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> > >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu  <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120703/9637b490/attachment.htm
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 92, Issue 6
> **************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120703/26c16c6d/attachment-0001.htm