SRM BRF Workflow

Mike Pokraka wug at workflowconnections.com
Tue Jul 3 07:01:15 EDT 2012 

Hi Stephane,

Agree MM release strategy usually tend to be the bread-and-butter type WFs
- although I've had some very interesting work there too.

I was talking about the more strategic work around business challenges.
Like PO approval, leave approval is simple enough. But add shift rotas and
mobile staff and it's a whole different beast.

As I said, it's just my opinion. I like functional/BPM side of WF, others
prefer the techie side.

Cheers,
Mike


On Tue, July 3, 2012 9:08 am, stephane wrote:
> Yes Mike good questions,  I have developped a lot of workflow in SRM
> mainly wit the N step Badi and it was good time, I do prefer the SRM
> workflow than working with the MM release strategy workflow...
>
> However from my point of view the BRF workflow in SRM provides issues
> with
>     - Deadline monitoring (you can not set different deadlines for the
> different step of your workflow). => they are all using the same task
>     - Substitution profile, as mentionned before the same tasks is being
> used and therefore you can not use different profile
> BRF seems to be an effort from SAP to make the rule more easy but BRF +
> has already made the BRF obsolete so my question to know if there is a
> plan to replace the BRF workflow in SRM by BRF+.
>
> I am pretty sure that we can change the task ID and therefore being able
> to add substitution profile and but I am not 100% sure that I can do
> it ...
>
> Cheers
> Stephane
>
> Le mardi 03 juillet 2012 à 01:51 -0400, sap-wug-request at mit.edu a
> écrit :
>
>> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>> 	sap-wug at mit.edu
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> 	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> 	sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> 	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: SRM BRF workflow (Ikhan)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:51:08 +0400
>> From: Ikhan <ikhansap at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: SRM BRF workflow
>> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> Message-ID:
>> 	<CADb5asoJbxyOCuoaQZ3Zf11MoKfiaBKyJszMtZtLrtNa9AuwKw at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>   Why did you avoid SRM Workflows. Any Particular reason for it.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mike Pokraka
>> <wug at workflowconnections.com>wrote:
>>
>> > Sorry can't help much with SRM details, worked hard to avoid it most
>> of my
>> > workflow career.
>> > If it helps, I once did an enhancement to integrate the BADI into the
>> > regular sapgui substitution dialog, so if the BADI doesn't work for
>> you
>> > something similar may also an option for you.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Mike
>> >
>> > On Fri, June 29, 2012 8:24 am, stephane wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks, Mike, for your answer, I know this Badi however I am not
>> 100%
>> > > sure that it will work in my case.
>> > > SRM one client with a Business All in One CLient without the EC
>> > > portal ....
>> > > No other solution wihtout UWL ?
>> > >
>> > > I am not yet 100% sure to know how the architecture of this solution
>> > > works.
>> > >
>> > > Some more questions :
>> > >     - SRM the Processed controled workflow (BRF) how does it work
>> for
>> > > different substitution profile ? It seems to be the same tasks
>> behing
>> > > every approval step
>> > >     - Same question but for deadline monitoriing can we have
>> different
>> > > time and 'escalation process' depending of the steps ?
>> > >     - Do you know if those BRF workflow will be replaced by BRFPlus
>> > > workflow soon ?
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> > > Stephane
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 ?  12:16 -0400, sap-wug-request at mit.edu a
>> ??crit :
>> > >
>> > >> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>> > >>      sap-wug at mit.edu
>> > >>
>> > >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> > >>      http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> > >>      sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>> > >>
>> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> > >>      sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>> > >>
>> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> > >> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Today's Topics:
>> > >>
>> > >>    1. Re: Substitution restriction list (Mike Pokraka)
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>
>> > >> Message: 1
>> > >> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:35:08 +0100 (BST)
>> > >> From: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> > >> Subject: Re: Substitution restriction list
>> > >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at MIT.EDU>
>> > >> Message-ID:
>> > >>      <efe2f511b736d57fb880f8fe2a85582c.squirrel at h.mail.aaisp.net.uk>
>> > >> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>> > >>
>> > >> G'Day,
>> > >>
>> > >> The BADI is WF_SUBSTITUTE but it's only for the UWL substitution
>> dialog.
>> > >> Given that you're on SRM this will probably work for you.
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards,
>> > >> Mike
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, June 28, 2012 9:53 am, stephane wrote:
>> > >> > Hello,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > General question around the substitute, is there a BADI to
>> control the
>> > >> > list of possible sustitute available to someone ?
>> > >> > I am not talking about a specific task but for instance I want
>> someone
>> > >> > to provide the susbtitution to only someone within the hierarchy
>> which
>> > >> > is at the same level or above ?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I would like to apply this in SRM one client (RDS - SRM 7)
>> > >> > My main goal would be to use the BRF workflow but due to the
>> > >> complexity
>> > >> > I could go back to the old n step badi workflow
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Cheers
>> > >> > Stephane
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Le mardi 26 juin 2012 ?? 00:28 -0400, sap-wug-request at mit.edu a
>> > ??crit
>> > >> :
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>> > >> >>   sap-wug at mit.edu
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> > >> >>   http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> > >> >>   sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> > >> >>   sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>> specific
>> > >> >> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Today's Topics:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>    1. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Mike Pokraka)
>> > >> >>    2. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Shaurya Jain)
>> > >> >>    3. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Mike Pokraka)
>> > >> >>    4. Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2 (Shaurya Jain)
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Message: 1
>> > >> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:29:03 +0100
>> > >> >> From: Mike Pokraka <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> > >> >> Message-ID:
>> > >> >>   <AF6F988D-C6B6-4410-9DD7-71FCB762DB1F at workflowconnections.com>
>> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Error message?
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Dear Experts,
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following
>> areas:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work item
>> is
>> > >> not
>> > >> >> getting removed from their inbox.
>> > >> >> PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get
>> triggered
>> > >> for
>> > >> >> the CREATE event.
>> > >> >> PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but
>> workitem not
>> > >> >> delievered to next responsible agent.
>> > >> >> and many more like this.......
>> > >> >> Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things
>> go
>> > >> fine.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are in
>> > >> error
>> > >> >> in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually
>> execute
>> > >> >> these LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the
>> activity
>> > >> for
>> > >> >> database update happens & things move as they have to. So I have
>> a
>> > >> >> workaround to resolve the problem temporarily.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> But I am still not able to find the root cause for this problem.
>> Even
>> > >> my
>> > >> >> Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking
>> the
>> > >> >> System Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that
>> values
>> > >> >> for parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt
>> > >> Interval
>> > >> >> [Mins] is set to 15.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be really
>> > >> great.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Regards,
>> > >> >> Shaurya Jain
>> > >> >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > >> >> URL:
>> > >> >>
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/74da4b73/attachment-0001.htm
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> ------------------------------
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Message: 2
>> > >> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:59:48 +0300
>> > >> >> From: Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> > >> >> Message-ID:
>> > >> >>   <
>> > CAFALVOOfFi7dxNu7Q5eumOFeA+ECP2Aq_pL0+wvBx6Z_aLaUpg at mail.gmail.com>
>> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> DB Error -9999
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Regards,
>> > >> >> Shaurya
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka"
>> <wug at workflowconnections.com
>> > >
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Error message?
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain
>> <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Dear Experts,
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following
>> areas:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work
>> item is
>> > >> not
>> > >> >> getting removed from their inbox.
>> > >> >> > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get
>> triggered
>> > >> for
>> > >> >> the CREATE event.
>> > >> >> > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but
>> workitem
>> > >> not
>> > >> >> delievered to next responsible agent.
>> > >> >> > and many more like this.......
>> > >> >> > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things
>> go
>> > >> >> fine.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are
>> in
>> > >> error
>> > >> >> in
>> > >> >> SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually
>> execute
>> > >> these
>> > >> >> LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity
>> for
>> > >> >> database
>> > >> >> update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a
>> workaround
>> > >> to
>> > >> >> resolve the problem temporarily.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this
>> problem.
>> > >> Even
>> > >> >> my
>> > >> >> Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On checking
>> the
>> > >> >> System
>> > >> >> Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values
>> for
>> > >> >> parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt
>> Interval
>> > >> >> [Mins]
>> > >> >> is set to 15.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be
>> really
>> > >> >> great.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Regards,
>> > >> >> > Shaurya Jain
>> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > >> >> URL:
>> > >> >>
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/4a435e09/attachment-0001.htm
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> ------------------------------
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Message: 3
>> > >> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:49:53 +0100
>> > >> >> From: Mike Pokraka <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> > >> >> Message-ID:
>> > >> >>   <7A53075A-C7F1-4AF1-A86C-0EB85E10DB54 at workflowconnections.com>
>> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> That sounds very much like a basis problem. Same error,
>> different
>> > >> >> transactions...
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Check the system log around the time of the transaction (SM21),
>> also
>> > >> >> maybe have a look for update errors (SM13). Very surprised basis
>> > >> can't
>> > >> >> help you further, might be worth another chat.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Regards,
>> > >> >> Mike
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:59, Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> DB Error -9999
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Regards,
>> > >> >> Shaurya
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka"
>> <wug at workflowconnections.com
>> > >
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Error message?
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain
>> <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Dear Experts,
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to workflows.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following
>> areas:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work
>> item is
>> > >> not
>> > >> >> getting removed from their inbox.
>> > >> >> > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get
>> triggered
>> > >> for
>> > >> >> the CREATE event.
>> > >> >> > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but
>> workitem
>> > >> not
>> > >> >> delievered to next responsible agent.
>> > >> >> > and many more like this.......
>> > >> >> > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times things
>> go
>> > >> >> fine.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs are
>> in
>> > >> error
>> > >> >> in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually
>> execute
>> > >> >> these LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the
>> activity
>> > >> >> for database update happens & things move as they have to. So I
>> have
>> > >> a
>> > >> >> workaround to resolve the problem temporarily.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this
>> problem.
>> > >> Even
>> > >> >> my Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On
>> checking
>> > >> the
>> > >> >> System Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that
>> values
>> > >> >> for parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt
>> > >> >> Interval [Mins] is set to 15.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be
>> really
>> > >> >> great.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Regards,
>> > >> >> > Shaurya Jain
>> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > >> >> URL:
>> > >> >>
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120625/f9c95eef/attachment-0001.htm
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> ------------------------------
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Message: 4
>> > >> >> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:28:07 +0300
>> > >> >> From: Shaurya Jain <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> >> Subject: Re: tRFC Errors in SWU2
>> > >> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> > >> >> Message-ID:
>> > >> >>   <CAFALVONy_J17YHEVHk=ZPsaK4yKqGYWge1AeVPO6By34BY_C=
>> > Q at mail.gmail.com>
>> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Thanks Susan & Mike for responding.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I will get in touch with the Basis team again & will update the
>> forum
>> > >> >> with
>> > >> >> solution.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Regards,
>> > >> >> Shaurya Jain
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Mike Pokraka
>> > >> >> <wug at workflowconnections.com>wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> > That sounds very much like a basis problem. Same error,
>> different
>> > >> >> > transactions...
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Check the system log around the time of the transaction
>> (SM21),
>> > >> also
>> > >> >> maybe
>> > >> >> > have a look for update errors (SM13). Very surprised basis
>> can't
>> > >> help
>> > >> >> you
>> > >> >> > further, might be worth another chat.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Regards,
>> > >> >> > Mike
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:59, Shaurya Jain
>> <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > DB Error -9999
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Regards,
>> > >> >> > Shaurya
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > On Jun 25, 2012 9:39 PM, "Mike Pokraka"
>> > >> <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>> > >> >> > wrote:
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > Error message?
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > On 25 Jun 2012, at 06:36, Shaurya Jain
>> <jain.shaurya at gmail.com>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > Dear Experts,
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > We are facing a problem with tRFC errors related to
>> workflows.
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > Many times in a day we receive users complaint in following
>> > >> areas:
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > They have actioned the work item from their inbox but work
>> item
>> > >> is
>> > >> >> not
>> > >> >> > getting removed from their inbox.
>> > >> >> > > PM Notification created by user but workflow did not get
>> > >> triggered
>> > >> >> for
>> > >> >> > the CREATE event.
>> > >> >> > > PO/PR release happened for a particular release code but
>> workitem
>> > >> >> not
>> > >> >> > delievered to next responsible agent.
>> > >> >> > > and many more like this.......
>> > >> >> > > Such cases are not happening always & most of the times
>> things go
>> > >> >> fine.
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > When I investigated in this issue more I found that tRFCs
>> are in
>> > >> >> error
>> > >> >> > in SWU2 log for TCodes ME54N, ME29N, IW21, etc. If I manually
>> > >> execute
>> > >> >> these
>> > >> >> > LUWs then the respective problem gets resolved as the activity
>> for
>> > >> >> database
>> > >> >> > update happens & things move as they have to. So I have a
>> > >> workaround
>> > >> >> to
>> > >> >> > resolve the problem temporarily.
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > But I am still not able to find the root cause for this
>> problem.
>> > >> >> Even my
>> > >> >> > Basis team is not able to help me out in this case. On
>> checking the
>> > >> >> System
>> > >> >> > Setting from Information menu in SWU2/SM58 I found that values
>> for
>> > >> >> > parameters Connection Attempt [No.] is set to 30 & Attempt
>> Interval
>> > >> >> [Mins]
>> > >> >> > is set to 15.
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > If anyone of you can provide any sort of help it would be
>> really
>> > >> >> great.
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > Regards,
>> > >> >> > > Shaurya Jain
>> > >> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> > >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > >> >> URL:
>> > >> >>
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120626/0667fc97/attachment.htm
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> ------------------------------
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 91, Issue 26
>> > >> >> ***************************************
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ------------------------------
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 91, Issue 28
>> > >> ***************************************
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> >
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>

More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list