UWL substitution vs. RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE

[Shai Eyal]

Hi Jocelyn,
Thanks for you willing to help, as always. In fact this time it is my fault. The substitution profile made the difference.
 
Thanks again,

Shai Eyal
SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow & BPM specialist


>________________________________
>From: "sap-wug-request at mit.edu" <sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu 
>Sent: Friday, 13 January 2012, 19:23
>Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 86, Issue 12
>
>Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>    sap-wug at mit.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>    sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>  1. RE: UWL substitution vs. RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE (Dart, Jocelyn)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:56:41 +0100
>From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
>Subject: RE: UWL substitution vs. RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message-ID:
>    <8C507B5E0BA5114E933C3C6E2E9729E00766004D54 at DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Hi Shai,
>Passive or active substitution?
>User based or position based?
>UWL supports user based substitution - both passive and active.
>Position-based active substitution will also work... but passive is more of a problem as the substitution toolbar is based on users not positions.
>Regards,
>Jocelyn
>
>From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Shai Eyal
>Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012 1:56 AM
>To: sap-wug
>Subject: UWL substitution vs. RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE
>
>Hello all,
>I've noticed some strange behaviour with UWL substitution and I wander if someone came across as well.
>If I define substitution via UWL it works well. However if I define the substitution via RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE on back-end, it does not affect UWL. It only affect SAP Inbox. The strange thing is I know it suppose to work. In addition, UWL substitution management screen lower part shows the definition set in RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE.
>
>Has anyone experienced such behaviour? any recommendations\suggestions?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Regards,
>Shai Eyal
>SAP Workflow & BPM specialist
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120113/7cb9f16e/attachment-0001.htm
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 86, Issue 12
>***************************************
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120113/76e01df8/attachment.htm