UWL substitution vs. RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE

[Dart, Jocelyn]

Hi Shai,
Passive or active substitution?
User based or position based?
UWL supports user based substitution - both passive and active.
Position-based active substitution will also work... but passive is more of a problem as the substitution toolbar is based on users not positions.
Regards,
Jocelyn

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Shai Eyal
Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012 1:56 AM
To: sap-wug
Subject: UWL substitution vs. RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE

Hello all,
I've noticed some strange behaviour with UWL substitution and I wander if someone came across as well.
If I define substitution via UWL it works well. However if I define the substitution via RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE on back-end, it does not affect UWL. It only affect SAP Inbox. The strange thing is I know it suppose to work. In addition, UWL substitution management screen lower part shows the definition set in RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE.

Has anyone experienced such behaviour? any recommendations\suggestions?

Thanks in advance,

Regards,
Shai Eyal
SAP Workflow & BPM specialist

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120113/7cb9f16e/attachment.htm