Workflow not responding to latest version of the business object

[Sudhir Pargaonkar]

Cinderella Principle!!!

Wait till tomorrow.. 



On Aug 23, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Mike Nickson <mikenickson at gmail.com> wrote:

> No generating a new instance each time by raising a new PO.
> 
> On 23 August 2012 15:03, Jimmy Sun <jjsun02 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike, 
> This is a dumb question, but...
> are you testing it is the same instance? 
> 
> Jimmy
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Mike Nickson <mikenickson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jimmy
>  
> No I am creating a new purchase order that is triggering a new workflow instance.
>  
> Mike
> 
> On 23 August 2012 14:48, Jimmy Sun <jjsun02 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike, 
> are you testing with an old workitem? Start a new workitem and check it again? 
> 
> Jimmy
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Mike Nickson <mikenickson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rick
>  
> Yes ZBUS2012 delegated as sub object of BUS2012, adn the workflow is using BUS2012.
>  
> I am loath to change the workflow as we are in the middle of QA testing, so trying to contain all changes via the object.
>  
> I bet this will all work tomorrow, but I am short of time here.
> Mike
> On 23 August 2012 14:33, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> So you did SWU_OBUF and you activated the object and, I assume, a new
> workflow instance was started.
> 
> The only thing I can think of is that you're not using the object
> intended. Is ZBUS2012 delegated or is it a copy?
> Does BUS2012 have a method of the same name?
> 
> regards
> Rick Bakker / hanabi technology
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Mike Nickson <mikenickson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have amended a method on ZBUS2012 to exit on a certain document type (ZA)
> > rather than perform the rest of the method code, saved and generated the
> > object in the development client.
> >
> > I test the object in the other client and it works fine.
> >
> > The workflow though seems to be hanging on to the old version of the object
> > code, and the results I am getting in the task container that calls the
> > method seems to be ignoring the new version of the code and it is not just
> > exiting and returning as I expect.
> >
> > I have even added a random error message to one of the method output
> > parameters to see if it is using the new version of the object, to no avail.
> >
> > Tried OBUF and logging off and on again but still this is mystifying me.
> >
> > The workflow task should be calling the latest version of the object, but
> > this doesn't seem to be happening.
> >
> > Any idea what I have missed ?
> >
> > How come when I test the object it works as I expect, but when the workflow
> > calls the object it doesn't ?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jimmy
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jimmy
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120823/4d86515c/attachment.htm