SAP_ALL SAP_NEW

[Edward Diehl]

Thanks, Eddie, but therein lies the problem.  We've applied the note and we are still left with tasks failing because of no-authorization - and these failed to show up on the Security's authorization trace.

As I asked, is anyone out there successfully using workflow where WF-BATCH does not have SAP_ALL AND SAP_NEW?

Ed

From: eddie.morris at sap.com
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:54:19 +0200
Subject: RE: SAP_ALL SAP_NEW



Hi Ed, Take a look at note 1251255 which introduces SAP_BC_BMT_WFM_SERV_USER. It takes care of the authorization for the workflow runtime but you still need to add application specific authorizations. KBA 1574002 also gives details. Regards,Eddie From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Diehl
Sent: 02 June 2011 19:33
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: RE: SAP_ALL SAP_NEW Is anyone out there successfully using workflow with WF-BATCH carrying something other than SAP_ALL & SAP_NEW security roles?

I'm sure many of you have confronted this issue.  I would be interested to hear your experience(s).

Thanks,
Ed 
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110602/afed0571/attachment.htm