AW: Why an already executed Workitem must be manually set to"executed"

Keohan, Susan - 1140 - MITLL keohan at ll.mit.edu
Tue Jun 15 12:56:12 EDT 2010


Thanks Ramki - my eyes were bleeding from looking at the 'new' technical log :)

----
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Specialist
Enterprise Applications
Information Services Department
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street, LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
keohan at LL.MIT.EDU
 

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Ramki Maley
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:35 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: AW: Why an already executed Workitem must be manually set to"executed"

You would see that message when the task has the 'Confirm end of 
processing' property checked. The agent is required to confirm the 
completion of the task on a pop up window.

Cheers,
Ramki.


On 6/15/10 11:11 AM, Mintchev Alexander, Mag. wrote:
> Hello Susan,
> Thank you for your prompt reaction.
> The workflow item is a standard task type. It is not a part of a
> workflow definition, but rather a standalone task.
> Attached, please find the requested information.
> Indeed, there is an error executing the action EVALUATE_AGENT_VIA_RULE.
> The system was not able to find an agent for this action.
> Could this be the reason for all the questions I have asked earlier?
> Thank you,
> Kind regards: Alexander
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Von:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *Im
> Auftrag von *Keohan, Susan - 1140 - MITLL
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 15. Juni 2010 16:37
> *An:* SAP Workflow Users' Group
> *Betreff:* RE: Why an already executed Workitem must be manually set
> to"executed"
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> What type of workitem is this? A decision task? A custom task?
>
> Perhaps a snapshot of the workflow technical log would be more helpful.
>
>
> Regards,
> Sue
>
> ----
>
> Susan R. Keohan
>
> SAP Workflow Specialist
>
> Enterprise Applications
>
> Information Services Department
>
> MIT Lincoln Laboratory
>
> 244 Wood Street, LI-200
>
> Lexington, MA. 02420
>
> 781-981-3561
>
> keohan at LL.MIT.EDU
>
> *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Mintchev Alexander, Mag.
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:01 AM
> *To:* SAP Workflow Users' Group
> *Subject:* Why an already executed Workitem must be manually set to
> "executed"
>
> Dear WUGgers!
>
> I have the following problem with a Workitem: In the table SWWUSERWI the
> work item 4626526 is shown as relevant for a particular user. At the
> same time, with the transaction *swi1 *I get the message "The work item
> has the status executed and must be set to the status completed manually"
>
> I have the following questions:
>
> (a) How is it possible that the Workitem 4626526 has the status
> “executed”, but at the same time is NOT shown in the table SWWUSERWI as
> irrelevant?
>
> (b) Why should the status of the Work Item 4626526 be manually set to
> executed now that it has already been executed?
>
> (c) Do you know the reason why the situation above has occurred?
>
> Please find the detailedproblem description, incl, screenshots in the
> attached Word document.
>
> Thank You!
>
> Kind regards: Alexander Mintchev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5279 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100615/8eee59ee/attachment.bin


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list