AW: Why an already executed Workitem must be manually set to"executed"

Mintchev Alexander, Mag. Alexander.Mintchev at biac.at
Tue Jun 15 11:11:48 EDT 2010


Hello Susan,
 
Thank you for your prompt reaction. 
The workflow item is a standard task type. It is not a part of a
workflow definition, but rather a standalone task.
Attached, please find the requested information. 
Indeed, there is an error executing the action EVALUATE_AGENT_VIA_RULE.
The system was not able to find an agent for this action.
Could this be the reason for all the questions I have asked earlier?
 
 
Thank you,
 
Kind regards: Alexander
 
 
 


________________________________

Von: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] Im Auftrag
von Keohan, Susan - 1140 - MITLL
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juni 2010 16:37
An: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Betreff: RE: Why an already executed Workitem must be manually set
to"executed"



Hi Alexander,

What type of workitem is this?  A decision task?  A custom task?  

Perhaps a snapshot of the workflow technical log would be more helpful.


Regards,
Sue

 

----

Susan R. Keohan

SAP Workflow Specialist

Enterprise Applications

Information Services Department

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

244 Wood Street, LI-200

Lexington, MA. 02420

781-981-3561

keohan at LL.MIT.EDU

 

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Mintchev Alexander, Mag.
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:01 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Why an already executed Workitem must be manually set to
"executed"

 

Dear WUGgers! 

 

I have the following problem with a Workitem: In the table SWWUSERWI the
work item 4626526 is shown as relevant for a particular user. At the
same time, with the transaction swi1  I get the message "The work item
has the status executed and must be set to the status completed
manually"

 

I have the following questions:

 

(a) How is it possible that the Workitem 4626526 has the status
"executed", but at the same time is NOT shown in the table SWWUSERWI as
irrelevant?

(b) Why should the status of the Work Item 4626526 be manually set to
executed now that it has already been executed?

(c) Do you know the reason why the situation above has occurred?

 

 

Please find the detailedproblem description, incl, screenshots in the
attached Word document.

 

 

Thank You!

 

Kind regards: Alexander Mintchev

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100615/2f941836/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: quest_WUG_techn_log.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 91136 bytes
Desc: quest_WUG_techn_log.doc
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100615/2f941836/attachment.doc


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list