UWL - Delta Pull - Refresh

Mon Jan 18 19:30:05 EST 2010

Hi,

We have a similar problem. After a while the data in the UWL display seems
to become corrupted.

Not only do the values in the Attribute columns no longer match the values
in the Subject column, but
also the URL links in the workitems become corrupted and point to the wrong
business objects.

Clearing the various caches fixes the problem.

The users are not impressed. And neither am I - it gives the impression
that workflow is a flaky product!

I will report it to OSS as well. I urge everyone to do so...

cheers
Paul Bakker

             Margaret Jaco                                                 
             <Margaret.Jaco at ce                                             
             .com.au>                                                   To 
             Sent by:                  "SAP Workflow Users' Group"         
             sap-wug-bounces at m         <sap-wug at mit.edu>                   
             it.edu                                                     cc 

                                                                   Subject 
             19/01/2010 08:59          RE: UWL - Delta Pull - Refresh      
             AM                                                            

             Please respond to                                             
               "SAP Workflow                                               
               Users' Group"                                               
             <sap-wug at mit.edu>                                             

Sorry I cannot help Ecept to say that we have had the same problem at our
site for about 6 months. I have tried to report it to SAP but the amount of
info they want to be able to prove that it happens is insurmountable. I
send information they ask for other information and so it goes along.

We get around it by clearing the cache but not before the users trust in
the system is destroyed.

We do have the delta pull program running, to set it up refer to pages 104
and 105 of book Universal Worklist with SAP Netweaver Portal by Darren
Hague.

Regards,

Margaret Jaco.

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Simon, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 6:12 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: UWL - Delta Pull - Refresh

Last week we had two workitems with conflicting data in the header and
body displayed in the UWL.  Workitem One had a header that really should
have been associated with Workitem Two's body of the workitem
description.  Workitem Two had a header that should have been related to
the body of the description for Workitem One.  Image attachments were
also mixed.
When executing the refresh, it did not make a difference in the way the
two workitems were displayed.
When the UWL was re-registered and the cache cleared the workitems
displayed correctly.

Delta Pull is configured for the UWL and it supposedly runs the default
of every minute.

What can I check to make sure that the Delta Pull is actually running
and updating the cache of the UWL.  My understanding is that it is a
java program that executes on the portal.

Thank you,

Tom Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 5:39 PM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 35

Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
        sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 32 (BPT Consulting)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:39:04 -0800 (PST)
From: BPT Consulting <bptconsulting at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 32
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <559456.94431.qm at web81603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Liz,
?
What does the dump show, see if you can get SAP_CTSK to execute without
the additional lines.
?
I don't know if there's a BADI where you can change the standard agent
resolution.? The?evaluation path should be the "easy" solution.?
?
Thomas

--- On Fri, 1/15/10, Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
wrote:

From: Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
Subject: RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 32
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Date: Friday, January 15, 2010, 11:23 AM

Thomas,

I changed the line 105 of SAP_CTSK and still got the same results.

I always refresh my buffers and log off and on to see if that helps
also.

What is very interesting is that with the tcode PPST when I execute it
with SAP_CTSK I get a short dump.? However when I execute it with a
Z_CTSK version I get my org structure displayed.?

So how can I get the agent assignment to use the Z_CTSK evaluation path
rather then the SAP_CTSK.? I have not been able to find where this is
configured.

Thank you for seeing this through with me.? It's pivotal to my project!

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:34 PM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 32

Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to ??? sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ???
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ???
sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at ??? sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."

Today's Topics:

???1. RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 28 (Halladay, Liz (Calgary))
???2. RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 28 (BPT Consulting)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:02:56 -0700
From: "Halladay, Liz (Calgary)" <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
Subject: RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 28
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Message-ID:
??? <4283D9D9E6583F40B92E335B515332BD0164F346 at CALEXCH2.global.ad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Thomas,

I changed line 210 to 105 as you suggested and still get the same
results.? I also deleted line 220 and 230.

I understand your concern about me changing the SAP supplied evaluation
path SAP_CTSK.? If I make a copy of it ZSAP_CTSK, how do I them link
that to agent assignment for my workflow task?

Thank you for your quick response.
Liz

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:34:10 -0700
From: "Halladay, Liz (Calgary)" <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
Subject: eval path SAP_CTSK No Agent Selected
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Message-ID:
??? <4283D9D9E6583F40B92E335B515332BD0164F197 at CALEXCH2.global.ad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

> I need help identifying why when I assign my highest Org Unit 1 to a
> task in Agent Assignment, I consistantly getting No Selected Agent.
>
> The following is an example of my org structure that I have created:
>
> Org Unit 1
> ??? Org Unit A
> ??? ??? Position 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 2
> ??? Org Unit B
> ??? ??? Position 2
> ??? ??? ??? User 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 2
> ??? ??? ??? User 3
> ??? Org Unit C
> ??? ??? Position 3
> ??? ??? ??? User 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 2
> ??? ??? ??? User 3
> ??? etc....
>
>
> I am assigning Org Unit 1 in the Agent Assignment.???This is not
> working.? If I list Org Unit A, B, C etc then it works.? I don't want
> to have to list all the org units as there are several.?
>
> Here is the Evaluation Path for SAP_CTSK Task customizing -> agent
> assignment? ? ? ? ???
>
> I added number 210, 220, 230.? I'm not sure if that is what I need or

>not?? ???
>?
>
>???No.Obj.TypA/B Relat'ship Relationship name???Priority Rel.obj.type
>Skip?
>???10???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? TS
>
>???11???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? T
>
>???20???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? WS
>
>???21???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? WF
>
>???30???TS? ???A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???31???WS? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???40???T? ? ???A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???41???WF? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???100? C? ? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? S
>
>???110? O? ? ? B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? S
>
>???120? *? ? ???A???008? ? ? ? Holder? ? ? ? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? *
>
>???130? A? ? ? A???003? ? ? ? Belongs to? ? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? S
>
>???140? P? ? ? B???208? ? ? ? Is identical to? ? ???*? ? ? ? US
>
>???150? AG? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???200? TG? ???A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???210? O? ? ? B???002? ? ? ? Is line supervisor? *? ? ? ? O
>
>???220? O? ? ? B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? S
>
>???230? S? ? ? A???008? ? ? ? Holder? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>
> If someone could help me determine what it is that? I am not doing
> correctly, I would greatly appreciate your help!

************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is
prohibited and that taking any action in reliance on the content of this
message is to be avoided.
Should you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call
(403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.

************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100113/29d6f4ea/a
ttachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:09:53 -0800 (PST)
From: BPT Consulting <bptconsulting at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: eval path SAP_CTSK No Agent Selected
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <26663.942.qm at web81603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Liz,
?
Don't have a system in front of me but will attempt to help.?
Your?starting point is an Org Unit, with users to be returned.
?
There are a number of ways to handle, I would suggest:
For line 210 change?line number to??
? 105? O????? B?? 002??????? Is line supervisor? *??????? O??????????
?

Line 220 not necessary because covered in line 110.
?
Line 230 not necessary because covered in line 120.
??
?
Be careful, the standard delivered evaluation path did not have this
relationship defined -?why?? Maybe because everyone in the company would
be an agent if?assigned incorrectly.? Will this change affect other
processes?
?
Regards,
Thomas Maue

--- On Wed, 1/13/10, Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
wrote:

From: Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
Subject: eval path SAP_CTSK No Agent Selected
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 4:34 PM

I need help identifying why when I assign my highest Org Unit 1 to a
task in Agent Assignment, I consistantly getting No Selected Agent.
The following is an example of my org structure that I have created:
Org Unit 1
??????? Org Unit A
??????? ??????? Position 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 2
??????? Org Unit B
??????? ??????? Position 2
??????? ??????? ??????? User 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 2
??????? ??????? ??????? User 3
??????? Org Unit C
??????? ??????? Position 3
??????? ??????? ??????? User 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 2
??????? ??????? ??????? User 3
??????? etc?.

I am assigning Org Unit 1 in the Agent Assignment.?? This is not
working.? If I list Org Unit A, B, C etc then it works.? I don't want to
have to list all the org units as there are several.?
Here is the Evaluation Path for SAP_CTSK Task customizing -> agent
assignment??????????
I added number 210, 220, 230.? I'm not sure if that is what I need or
not?????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????
? No.Obj.TypA/B Relat'ship Relationship name?? Priority Rel.obj.type??
Skip?
? 10?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
TS??????????????????
? 11?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
T???????????????????
? 20?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
WS??????????????????
? 21?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
WF??????????????????
? 30?? TS???? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 31?? WS??? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 40?? T?????? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 41?? WF??? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 100? C????? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 110? O????? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 120? *?????? A?? 008??????? Holder????????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 130? A????? A?? 003??????? Belongs to????????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 140? P????? B?? 208??????? Is identical to?????? *???????
US??????????????????
? 150? AG??? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 200? TG???? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 210? O????? B?? 002??????? Is line supervisor? *???????
O???????????????????
? 220? O????? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 230? S????? A?? 008??????? Holder???????????????? *???????
*???????????????????
If someone could help me determine what it is that? I am not doing
correctly, I would greatly appreciate your help!
************************************************************
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is
prohibited and that taking any action in reliance on the content of this
message is to be avoided. Should you receive this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call (403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.
************************************************************
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100113/899851de/a
ttachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 28
***************************************

************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is
prohibited and that taking any action in reliance on the content of this
message is to be avoided.
Should you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call
(403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.

************************************************************

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:34:06 -0800 (PST)
From: BPT Consulting <bptconsulting at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 28
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <835997.4846.qm at web81602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Liz,
?
Did you run SWU_OBUF to clear the buffers?
?
Maybe we have it backwards, try:
? 105? O????? A?? 002??????? Reports To????? *??????? O??????????
?
You can test with transaction PPST and see what your infotype records
are.
?
Regards,
Thomas

1/14/10, Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com> wrote:

From: Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
Subject: RE: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 28
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 2:02 PM

Thomas,

I changed line 210 to 105 as you suggested and still get the same
results.? I also deleted line 220 and 230.

I understand your concern about me changing the SAP supplied evaluation
path SAP_CTSK.? If I make a copy of it ZSAP_CTSK, how do I them link
that to agent assignment for my workflow task?

Thank you for your quick response.
Liz

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:34:10 -0700
From: "Halladay, Liz (Calgary)" <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
Subject: eval path SAP_CTSK No Agent Selected
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Message-ID:
??? <4283D9D9E6583F40B92E335B515332BD0164F197 at CALEXCH2.global.ad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

> I need help identifying why when I assign my highest Org Unit 1 to a
> task in Agent Assignment, I consistantly getting No Selected Agent.
>
> The following is an example of my org structure that I have created:
>
> Org Unit 1
> ??? Org Unit A
> ??? ??? Position 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 2
> ??? Org Unit B
> ??? ??? Position 2
> ??? ??? ??? User 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 2
> ??? ??? ??? User 3
> ??? Org Unit C
> ??? ??? Position 3
> ??? ??? ??? User 1
> ??? ??? ??? User 2
> ??? ??? ??? User 3
> ??? etc....
>
>
> I am assigning Org Unit 1 in the Agent Assignment.???This is not
> working.? If I list Org Unit A, B, C etc then it works.? I don't want
> to have to list all the org units as there are several.?
>
> Here is the Evaluation Path for SAP_CTSK Task customizing -> agent
> assignment? ? ? ? ???
>
> I added number 210, 220, 230.? I'm not sure if that is what I need or

>not?? ???
>?
>
>???No.Obj.TypA/B Relat'ship Relationship name???Priority Rel.obj.type
>Skip?
>???10???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? TS
>
>???11???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? T
>
>???20???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? WS
>
>???21???FA? ???B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? WF
>
>???30???TS? ???A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???31???WS? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???40???T? ? ???A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???41???WF? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???100? C? ? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? S
>
>???110? O? ? ? B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? S
>
>???120? *? ? ???A???008? ? ? ? Holder? ? ? ? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? *
>
>???130? A? ? ? A???003? ? ? ? Belongs to? ? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? S
>
>???140? P? ? ? B???208? ? ? ? Is identical to? ? ???*? ? ? ? US
>
>???150? AG? ? A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???200? TG? ???A???007? ? ? ? Describes? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>???210? O? ? ? B???002? ? ? ? Is line supervisor? *? ? ? ? O
>
>???220? O? ? ? B???003? ? ? ? Incorporates? ? ? ? *? ? ? ? S
>
>???230? S? ? ? A???008? ? ? ? Holder? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???*? ? ? ? *
>
>
> If someone could help me determine what it is that? I am not doing
> correctly, I would greatly appreciate your help!

************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is
prohibited and that taking any action in reliance on the content of this
message is to be avoided.
Should you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call
(403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.

************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100113/29d6f4ea/a
ttachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:09:53 -0800 (PST)
From: BPT Consulting <bptconsulting at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: eval path SAP_CTSK No Agent Selected
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <26663.942.qm at web81603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Liz,
?
Don't have a system in front of me but will attempt to help.?
Your?starting point is an Org Unit, with users to be returned.
?
There are a number of ways to handle, I would suggest:
For line 210 change?line number to??
? 105? O????? B?? 002??????? Is line supervisor? *??????? O??????????
?

Line 220 not necessary because covered in line 110.
?
Line 230 not necessary because covered in line 120.
??
?
Be careful, the standard delivered evaluation path did not have this
relationship defined -?why?? Maybe because everyone in the company would
be an agent if?assigned incorrectly.? Will this change affect other
processes?
?
Regards,
Thomas Maue

--- On Wed, 1/13/10, Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
wrote:

From: Halladay, Liz (Calgary) <Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com>
Subject: eval path SAP_CTSK No Agent Selected
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 4:34 PM

I need help identifying why when I assign my highest Org Unit 1 to a
task in Agent Assignment, I consistantly getting No Selected Agent.
The following is an example of my org structure that I have created:
Org Unit 1
??????? Org Unit A
??????? ??????? Position 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 2
??????? Org Unit B
??????? ??????? Position 2
??????? ??????? ??????? User 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 2
??????? ??????? ??????? User 3
??????? Org Unit C
??????? ??????? Position 3
??????? ??????? ??????? User 1
??????? ??????? ??????? User 2
??????? ??????? ??????? User 3
??????? etc?.

I am assigning Org Unit 1 in the Agent Assignment.?? This is not
working.? If I list Org Unit A, B, C etc then it works.? I don't want to
have to list all the org units as there are several.?
Here is the Evaluation Path for SAP_CTSK Task customizing -> agent
assignment??????????
I added number 210, 220, 230.? I'm not sure if that is what I need or
not?????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????
? No.Obj.TypA/B Relat'ship Relationship name?? Priority Rel.obj.type??
Skip?
? 10?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
TS??????????????????
? 11?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
T???????????????????
? 20?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
WS??????????????????
? 21?? FA???? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
WF??????????????????
? 30?? TS???? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 31?? WS??? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 40?? T?????? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 41?? WF??? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 100? C????? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 110? O????? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 120? *?????? A?? 008??????? Holder????????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 130? A????? A?? 003??????? Belongs to????????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 140? P????? B?? 208??????? Is identical to?????? *???????
US??????????????????
? 150? AG??? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 200? TG???? A?? 007??????? Describes?????????? *???????
*???????????????????
? 210? O????? B?? 002??????? Is line supervisor? *???????
O???????????????????
? 220? O????? B?? 003??????? Incorporates??????? *???????
S???????????????????
? 230? S????? A?? 008??????? Holder???????????????? *???????
*???????????????????
If someone could help me determine what it is that? I am not doing
correctly, I would greatly appreciate your help!
************************************************************
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is
prohibited and that taking any action in reliance on the content of this
message is to be avoided. Should you receive this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call (403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.
************************************************************
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100113/899851de/a
ttachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 28
***************************************

************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is
prohibited and that taking any action in reliance on the content of this
message is to be avoided.
Should you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call
(403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.

************************************************************

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100114/db80dffa/a
ttachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 32
***************************************

************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is
prohibited and that taking any action in reliance on the content of this
message is to be avoided. Should you receive this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call (403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.

************************************************************

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100115/fc990e94/a
ttachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 62, Issue 35
***************************************

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

The information contained in this email and any attached files are strictly
private and confidential. This email should be read by the intended
addressee
only. If the recipient of this message is not the intended addressee,
please
call Corporate Express Australia Limited on +61 2 9335 0555 or Corporate
Express
New Zealand Limited on +64 9 271 7600 and promptly delete this email and
any
attachments. The intended recipient of this email may only use, reproduce,
disclose or distribute the information contained in this email and any
attached
files with Corporate Express' permission. If you are not the intended
addressee,
you are strictly prohibited from using, reproducing, disclosing or
distributing
the information contained in this email and any attached files. Corporate
Express advises that this email and any attached files should be scanned to
detect viruses. Corporate Express accepts no liability for loss or damage
(whether caused by negligence or not) resulting from the use of any
attached
files.

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

******************************************************************************************************************************************************

Only an individual or entity who is intended to be a recipient of this e-mail may access or use the information contained in this e-mail or any of its attachments.  Opinions contained in this e-mail or any of its attachments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Queensland Treasury.

The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be legally privileged and the subject of copyright.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland Treasury immediately and erase all copies of the e-mail and the attachments.  Queensland Treasury uses virus scanning software.  However, it is not liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in any attachment.  

******************************************************************************************************************************************************