[LIKELY JUNK]EXTENDED NOTIFICATIONS

[Ramki Maley]

It is SWN_TEST_VERI01 which is used to verify the standard functions, 
that creates its own selection & delivery schedules.

SWN_SELSEN_TEST verifies the custom configuration. I would think There 
is a problem with the defined Schedules and/or Subscriptions.

Cheers,
Ramki.

Rick Bakker wrote:
> Hello,
>  
> As you no doubt noticed, it says the selection schedule does not exist.
> Very strange for SWN_SELSEN_TEST, as it creates its own selection schedule.
> I would advise you to run SWN_SELSEN_TEST in debug mode (/h) to see 
> exactly what the problem is.
>  
> regards
> Rick Bakker
> Hanabi Technology
>  
> On 3/13/09, *Gayathri Shivakumar* <Gayathri.Shivakumar at us.yazaki.com 
> <mailto:Gayathri.Shivakumar at us.yazaki.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Thanks Jocelyn,
> 
>      
> 
>     I did the changes you recommended. I ran the tester program
>     SWN_SELSEN_TEST. Here is the error I get: Please let me know what is
>     missing in my swnconfig.
> 
>      
> 
>     Regards, Gayathri
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>
>     [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>]
>     *On Behalf Of *Dart, Jocelyn
>     *Sent:* Thursday, March 12, 2009 6:03 PM
>     *To:* SAP Workflow Users' Group
>     *Subject:* RE: [LIKELY JUNK]EXTENDED NOTIFICATIONS
> 
>      
> 
>     Hi Gayathri,
> 
>      
> 
>     Extended Notifications completely replaces RSWUWFML2.  You should
>     not use RSWUWFML2 any longer (it still works but no-one will
>     guarantee it's future).
> 
>      
> 
>     Sending of notifications to org objects is not dependent on which
>     technique you use.  That is dependent on the central SAP Office
>     settings in your system in transaction SO16.  You need to allow
>     mails to be sent to Org objects.
> 
>      
> 
>     I suspect your configuration in SWNCONFIG is not correct and that is
>     why you are having problems.
> 
>     You should be using recipient type = *
> 
>     and using the standard recipient handler class to find the email
>     addresses of the agents.
> 
>     You should also set the priorities for where the email address is
>     held in General Settings - if it is held in infotype 105/0010 then
>     put ESS as top priority, if it's held in the user master put CAM as
>     top priority.
> 
>      
> 
>     There is a tester program SWN_SELSEN_TEST and logs in transaction
>     SLG1 to provide further information to help you.
> 
>      
> 
>     Hope that helps.
> 
>     Regards,
> 
>     Jocelyn
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>
>     [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>]
>     *On Behalf Of *Gayathri Shivakumar
>     *Sent:* Friday, 13 March 2009 1:00 AM
>     *To:* sap-wug at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>
>     *Subject:* [LIKELY JUNK]EXTENDED NOTIFICATIONS
> 
>     Hi Experts,
> 
>      
> 
>     I have been reading through all the material posted here for
>     extended notifications. I am confused as to what is the capability
>     of this functionality is. Here are a few of the functions I have to
>     achieve:
> 
>      
> 
>        1. Have workitems ( tasks basically ) for users in outlook,UWL as
>           well as SAP inbox.- I have done this through scheduling a job
>           for RSWUWFML2.
>        2. *Have notifications ( Send Mail step with recipient type = Org
>           Object ) sent to outlook, UWL and inbox. – I have not been
>           able to achieve this. I have configured swnconfig and have a
>           job for swnselsen.* **
>        3. Have notifications ( Send Mail step with recipient type =
>           E-Mail address ) sent to outlook, UWL and inbox - I have been
>           able to achieve this. I have configured swnconfig and have a
>           job for swnselsen.
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
>     My main concern at this point is item no.2. Please let me know what
>     should my approach be.
> 
>      
> 
>     Regards,
> 
>      
> 
>     Gayathri
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     SAP-WUG mailing list
>     SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>     http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug