Occasional SYSFAIL tRFC entries for WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 since ECC 6 Upgrade with Event Queue lock message

[Florin Wach]

Thank you Mike, for this contribution :-)
Good to hear that the bugfixing has worked well!

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:15:22 +0000
> Von: Mike Gambier <madgambler at hotmail.com>
> An: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Betreff: RE: Occasional SYSFAIL tRFC entries for WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 since	ECC 6	Upgrade with Event Queue lock message

> 
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> The SAP Gods have spoken on this issue and the word is: bug squished by
> Note 1308432.
> 
>  
> 
> And the word is good.
> 
>  
> 
> Mike GT 
>  
> 
> 
> From: madgambler at hotmail.com
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: Occasional SYSFAIL tRFC entries for WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 since ECC
> 6 Upgrade with Event Queue lock message
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:06:46 +0000
> 
> 
> 
> Fellow WUGgers,
>  
> Since we upgraded to EEC 6 the new Event delivery framework has thrown up
> an odd situation to do with the table lock placed on SWEQUEUE.
>  
> Whenever Work Items being executed by users try to trigger events
> asynchronously whilst at the same time the background SWEQSRV job just happens to
> be running as well, the tRFC for the event raise is set to status SYSFAIL in
> ARFCSSTATE with the message 'Object requested is locked by <whatever
> userid scheduled the job>'. 
>  
> Later on, when the next RSARFCEX job picks up these tRFCs, the error
> messages are then changed to 'Data has been changed in the meantime - the action
> is canceled'. 
>  
> We're currently unsure as to whether anything happens with these tRFCS
> afterwards, but their date and time values continue to change with each new
> RSARFCEX job run (although their keys do not) so presumably they are
> re-processed in some way, again and again, unless we trash them via SM58.
>  
> We've opened a ticket to ask for some advice on this one, but I wondered
> if anyone else had encountered this?
>  
> As a precaution we're trying to increase the delay between each SWEQSRV
> job run to see if we can reduce the number of errored tRFCs but that's merely
> a patch on a bigger problem I think.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Mike GT
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free Find out more!
> _________________________________________________________________
> All your Twitter and other social updates in one place 
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/