[LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection & Schedule selection in Extended Notif. Config.

[Rick Bakker]

Hello,

Did you look what's happening within fm SWN_CALL_BSP during debug
to see why it's "Unable to determine" e-mail addresses and telephone numbers?

regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

On 2/25/09, Griffiths, Mark <mark.griffiths at sap.com> wrote:
>
> That error message sometimes results from some of the SWN* BSP applications
> not being activated in transaction SICF.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
>
> Mark
>
> SAP UK
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Stefaan
> Vermeulen
> Sent: 25 February 2009 15:57
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection & Schedule
> selection in Extended Notif. Config.
>
>
> Thanks Rick and Jocelyn for the extra info,
>
> I narrowed my problem down to the sending part of  SWN_SELSEN.
> Message SWN 032 seems to be the killer here.
> By debugging it seems a call function that uses a template related to BSP
> produces the error.
> message SWN 032.
>
> I thought solving this by creating another delivery type not related to the
> template, but it seems this field( BSP-URL) has to be filled up.
>
> What am I still missing ?
>
> kind regards,
> Stefaan.
> In attachment related prints
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2009/2/24 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>
> > Stefaan,
> >
> > Stefaan,
> >
> > How many entries do you have in table SWN_NOTIF? That's
> > the table filled by the Selection process and read by
> > the Delivery process.
> >
> > Because you haven't been able to send any, maybe they're
> > piling up. And maybe when you first ran it you didn't
> > have a very restrictive filter in place? This could explain
> > why it's showing 56K notifications selected.
> >
> > I tried removing the telephone number from a user, the notification
> > still made it to SOST.
> >
> >
> > regards
> > Rick Bakker
> > Hanabi Technology
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/23/09, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Stefaan,
> > >
> > > 'Unable to send 000000 messages due to errors'
> > > That's good news.
> > >
> > > "It seems that also the users telephone number has to be filled in to
> > > avoid an error"
> > > I find that very unlikely. I'll have to try that. I suspect all my users
> > > have telephone numbers.
> > >
> > > "The subscription part is that Ok(attachment)? in your opinion "
> > > Yes.  Well, it's the same as mine.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure why it's picking up 50K messages, SLG1 is
> > > a good idea. Or do some debugging - a good way to learn
> > > about the internals.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Rick Bakker
> > > Hanabi Technology
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/23/09, Dart, Jocelyn <jocelyn.dart at sap.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Stefan,
> > > >
> > > > Try using transaction SLG1 when you get errors ... you will find logs
> giving
> > > > more details.
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jocelyn
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > > > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Stefaan
> > > > Vermeulen
> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 February 2009 9:44 PM
> > > > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > > > Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection & Schedule selection in
> > > > Extended Notif. Config.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rick,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the answer.
> > > > Like you said, combination of bad naming of parameters and more
> > > > posibilities.
> > > >
> > > > The previous screen-shot was indeed related to a initial date for a
> delta.
> > > > After that I executed it again and got a number of selected
> notifications.
> > > > But in the end I got the very helpfull message.
> > > > 'Unable to sent 000000 messages due to errors'.
> > > >
> > > > I'm still wrestling to get a message in /nSCOT.
> > > > It seems that also the users telephone number has to be filled in to
> avoid
> > > > an error ?
> > > >
> > > > The subscription part is that Ok(attachment)? in you're opinion ? for
> a
> > > > plain SAPGui on ECC6 with a outlook mail server ?
> > > >
> > > > I used also used swn_selsen_test to cast some light to the problem,
> without
> > > > much succes.
> > > > Even my filter of one specific task gives about 50000 items selected.
> > > >
> > > > I'm afraid that debugging will be necessary
> > > >
> > > > Txs,
> > > > S.
> > > >
> > > > 2009/2/20 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't encountered that warning in your attachment:
> > > > >
> > > > > Filter YTIB_DELTA does not have a time stamp
> > > > >
> > > > > but I guess it means that it's try to apply a delta
> > > > > while it doesn't have a baseline time. It could be
> > > > > that it'll only give that warning the first time.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Rick Bakker
> > > > > Hanabi Technology
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/20/09, Stefaan Vermeulen <stefaan.vermeulen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I took the time to search trough the sap-help, group archives and
> sdn
> > > > blogs,
> > > > > > without specific answers to this question.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Although I'm quite familiar with the SAP-logic it stuns me  from
> time to
> > > > > > time how one can create something complicated for simple things
> like
> > > > > > scheduling.
> > > > > > I'm used to the scheduling with rswuwfml2( I don't see regarding
> > > > scheduling
> > > > > > what was wrong with these parameters)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can someone explain me in a simple way how to use these 3
> parameters in
> > > > > > combination and how they influence each other ?
> > > > > > -Schedule selection.
> > > > > > -Delivery schedule
> > > > > > -The scheduling of the program SWN_SELSEN
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I kept it simple regarding these config and selected every day of
> the
> > > > week
> > > > > > from 06:00 to 17:00.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The only thing I want to do is ; send a few new created work-items
> to
> > > > > > outlook.
> > > > > > I'm fumbling around with SWN_SELSEN_TEST with a DELTA filter but
> (first)
> > > > > > without restrictions on TASK in filter.
> > > > > > I don't get a clear view of the problem in
> SWN_SELSEN_TEST.(attachment)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Stefaan.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>