ECC 6.0: Issues With Header Event to cancel Workflow

Ramki Maley rmaley at erpworkflow.com
Fri Feb 20 11:48:16 EST 2009


Sheldon, Header events are supposed to help you avoid the Wait for event 
forks and keep the workflow simple. I really don't want to go that way.

Regards,
Ramki.

Sheldon Oxenberg wrote:
> In the workflow, you could use a fork with a parallel path that waits for
> the event and then completes the workflow?
> 
> Regards,
> Sheldon
> CSC
> 
> 
> 
>                                                                            
>              Ramki Maley                                                   
>              <rmaley at erpworkfl                                             
>              ow.com>                                                    To 
>              Sent by:                  "SAP Workflow Users' Group"         
>              sap-wug-bounces at m         <sap-wug at mit.edu>                   
>              it.edu                                                     cc 
>                                                                            
>                                                                    Subject 
>              02/20/2009 08:46          Re: ECC 6.0: Issues With Header     
>              AM                        Event to cancel Workflow            
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
>              Please respond to                                             
>                "SAP Workflow                                               
>                Users' Group"                                               
>              <sap-wug at mit.edu>                                             
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Eddie,
> 
> Thanks for the response. I am not raising the event. This is standard
> SAP 'Released' Event for PO (BUS2012). I probably should activate the
> Event Queue for this event in order to avoid any conflicts.
> 
> Regards,
> Ramki.
> 
> Morris, Eddie wrote:
>> Hi Ramki,
>>
>> Do you raise the RELEASED event via custom code? Do you use
>> SWE_EVENT_CREATE?
>>
>> If you raise the event via SWE_EVENT_CREATE please make note that the
>> Function module SWE_EVENT_CREATE should not be called with flag
>> START_RECFB_SYNCHRON = 'X'.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eddie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
>> Of Ramki Maley
>> Sent: 20 February 20, 2009 3:04
>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
>> Subject: ECC 6.0: Issues With Header Event to cancel Workflow
>>
>> System ECC 6.0 SAPKA70015 / SAPKB70015
>>
>> This is a new implementation that recently went live. I have a PO
>> approval Workflow in which the last step is a Synchronous Background
>> Task that releases the PO after the necessary approval steps. Please
>> note that the approval step is not in any Fork and is the very last
>> step. I have defined the 'Released' event to cancel the WF at the header
>>
>> level in the WF Builder (SWDD) in order to cater to approval outside
>> workflow. When the Released event is created by WF-BATCH in the BG step,
>>
>> the WF is complete by the time the system tries to process the
>> terminating event,. However I noticed that the Released event in some
>> cases is being flagged as in error and put in event queue. I switched on
>>
>> the trace for the event and monitored it. The event trace sometimes
>> shows 'No Receiver Entered' for some instances (which is perfectly fine)
>>
>> and Error for the rest. The message does not show any locking conflicts.
>>
>>   Redelivering the event creates the same error message (No
>> configuration for workflow WS900XXX version n). Please see the attached
>> picture for example entries from WF Log and Event Log.
>>
>> Any pointers in stopping the Events being written to the queue would be
>> greatly apreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ramki.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug



More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list