RSWUWFML2 vs Extended Notification
Imthiaz ahmed
simthiaz at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 12 10:42:38 EDT 2008
RSWUWFML2 just works fine. Extended notificaition has additional functionalities and flexibilities. That's it.
Regards,
Imthiaz Ahmed
'Putting things right between two people is charity' - Hadith
> From: sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 39
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:26:16 -0400
>
> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> sap-wug at mit.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. RSWUWFML2 vs Extended Notification (Miller, Jerry)
> 2. Re: RSWUWFML2 vs Extended Notification (Cathy)
> 3. Performance with 4.6C and ECC6 (Sample, Rick)
> 4. RE: Performance with 4.6C and ECC6 (Mike Gambier)
> 5. Gordon Blackmore/SaskTel/CA is out of the office.
> (Gordon Blackmore)
> 6. User Exit Triggering workflow (muralitharan.c at tcs.com)
> 7. RE: User Exit Triggering workflow (Read, Tony)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:28:54 -0700
> From: "Miller, Jerry" <Jerry.Miller at NOVELLUS.com>
> Subject: RSWUWFML2 vs Extended Notification
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <63B36FB1288C1A4D8AE8B807730D47CF01818432 at EVS1.corp.novellus.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are in the beginning stages of moving to ECC6. I have read that
> RSWUWFML2 has been replaced by Extended Notifications.
>
> Does this mean that RSWUWFML2 does not work in ECC6? Or just that
> Extended Notifications is better?
>
> -Jerry
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/fcc7c955/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Cathy <xinos_cat at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: RSWUWFML2 vs Extended Notification
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID: <191647.67564.qm at web36205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Seem to work fine.? We just upgraded 2 weeks ago.?
> ?
> Cathy
>
> --- On Thu, 9/11/08, Miller, Jerry <Jerry.Miller at novellus.com> wrote:
>
> From: Miller, Jerry <Jerry.Miller at novellus.com>
> Subject: RSWUWFML2 vs Extended Notification
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 1:28 PM
>
>
>
> #yiv572551626 DIV {
> MARGIN:0px;}
>
>
> ??? We are in the beginning stages of moving to ECC6. I have read that RSWUWFML2 has been replaced by Extended Notifications.
> ?
> ??? Does this mean that RSWUWFML2 does not work in ECC6? Or just that Extended Notifications is better?
> ?
> ??? -Jerry
> ?
> ?
> ?_______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/e795f54d/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:36:21 -0500
> From: "Sample, Rick" <Rick.Sample at graybar.com>
> Subject: Performance with 4.6C and ECC6
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Cc: "Sample, Rick" <rick.sample at graybar.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1897E92A96C47648A6574CB9A51C640706F26D63 at SEBEV1PW.graybar.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are preparing to upgrade 4.6c to ECC6. I have been tasked to do a
> "performance compare" between the two systems for WF relegated items.
>
> Anyone have any tools, methods, etc. to do this type of performance
> checks? I am not sure as to what to compare or how.
>
>
>
> Rick Sample | SAP Business Workflow Developer
> Office (314) 573-5822 | Mobile (314) 952-2273 | rick.sample at graybar.com
> www.graybar.com <http://www.graybar.com/> - Graybar Works to Your
> Advantage
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/94028cbb/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:33:56 +0000
> From: Mike Gambier <madgambler at hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: Performance with 4.6C and ECC6
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID: <BAY117-W4254129593A05759393BBED5560 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>
> Rick,
>
> We're doing the same at the moment.
>
> Are you focusing on the Basis side of things (e.g. like 'buffer gets' on the db, database locks) or the Application/Business Process area (e.g. event delivery, deadlines etc) or both?
>
> Mike GT
>
>
>
> Subject: Performance with 4.6C and ECC6Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:36:21 -0500From: Rick.Sample at graybar.comTo: sap-wug at mit.eduCC: rick.sample at graybar.com
>
> We are preparing to upgrade 4.6c to ECC6. I have been tasked to do a "performance compare" between the two systems for WF relegated items.
>
> Anyone have any tools, methods, etc. to do this type of performance checks? I am not sure as to what to compare or how.
>
>
> Rick Sample | SAP Business Workflow DeveloperOffice (314) 573-5822 | Mobile (314) 952-2273 | rick.sample at graybar.com www.graybar.com - Graybar Works to Your Advantage
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Win New York holidays with Kellogg?s & Live Search
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354033/direct/01/
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/56ce1456/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:06:32 -0600
> From: Gordon Blackmore <gordon.blackmore at sasktel.sk.ca>
> Subject: Gordon Blackmore/SaskTel/CA is out of the office.
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <OFAE3F0121.A8DDD9FE-ON062574C1.007972B9-062574C1.007972B9 at sasktel.sk.ca>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
> I will be out of the office starting 09/11/2008 and will not return until
> 09/15/2008.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:12:52 +0530
> From: muralitharan.c at tcs.com
> Subject: User Exit Triggering workflow
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <OFFC488D2F.040C1A9A-ON652574C2.001EF2DC-652574C2.001EA2DA at tcs.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi friends,
>
> Thanks for all to provide valuable Information!
>
> Now I need to trigger a workflow through User exit for T-code ME51n,
> Already i have found user exit but I having doubt in which either
> SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT or Macro SWE_CREATE_EVENT to use.
>
> If possible I request you to provide a piece of sample code how to pass
> the value to this above two event from workflow. I new to this scenario
> that why i requested.
>
> Please provide me your ideas and information for same.
>
> Regards,
>
> Muralitharan C
> Tata Consultancy Services
> Mailto: muralitharan.c at tcs.com
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
> ____________________________________________
> Experience certainty. IT Services
> Business Solutions
> Outsourcing
> ____________________________________________
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080912/2e954c9a/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:25:26 +0800
> From: "Read, Tony" <Tony.Read at woodside.com.au>
> Subject: RE: User Exit Triggering workflow
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <FA4DA1ED678AD24FB61883280EDBAEB905479809 at permls08.wde.woodside.com.au>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> You have two option functions or classes and where you exit is in an
> update task.
>
> Functions
> SWE_EVENT_CREATE or SWE_EVENT_CREATE_FOR_UPD_TASK
>
> Clases
> cl_swf_evt_event=>RAISE or
> cl_swf_evt_event=>RAISE_IN_UPDATE_TASK
>
>
> Regards
> Anthony Read
>
> SAP ABAP Consultant
> Woodside SAP Services
> Tel +61 (08) 9348 4428
> Fax +61 (08) 9348 5387
> Anthony.read at woodside.com.au
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of muralitharan.c at tcs.com
> Sent: Friday, 12 September 2008 1:43 PM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: User Exit Triggering workflow
>
>
>
> Hi friends,
>
> Thanks for all to provide valuable Information!
>
> Now I need to trigger a workflow through User exit for T-code ME51n,
> Already i have found user exit but I having doubt in which either
> SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT or Macro SWE_CREATE_EVENT to use.
>
> If possible I request you to provide a piece of sample code how to pass
> the value to this above two event from workflow. I new to this scenario
> that why i requested.
>
> Please provide me your ideas and information for same.
>
> Regards,
>
> Muralitharan C
> Tata Consultancy Services
> Mailto: muralitharan.c at tcs.com
> Website: http://www.tcs.com <http://www.tcs.com/>
> ____________________________________________
> Experience certainty. IT Services
> Business Solutions
> Outsourcing
> ____________________________________________
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
>
> NOTICE: This email and any attachments are confidential.
> They may contain legally privileged information or
> copyright material. You must not read, copy, use or
> disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an
> intended recipient, please contact us at once by return
> email and then delete both messages and all attachments.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080912/9795fa43/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 39
> ***************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn “10 hidden secrets” from Jamie.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080912/2a1e142e/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list