Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCHuser
Florin Wach
florin.wach at gmx.net
Thu Sep 11 03:43:45 EDT 2008
Hi Margaret,
you also may create a new object method, e.g. FIPP.PostDialog and mark this as "synchronous, dialog" with the coding of
swc_call_method self 'POST' container.
IF sy-subrc ...
"Handel exception 1001 and 1002 here and pass on
This way (after removing that step in-between that changes the user-ID to WF-BATCH) that task will be executing with the current user-id, but you have to take more care about the workflow-pattern, as the user might struggle with such a work item in his inbox, if there was an exception on the POST-Method.
Best wishes,
Florin
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:25:59 +0100 (BST)
> Von: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
> An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Betreff: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCHuser
> Hi Margaret,
>
> Yes, you assume correctly. The tRFC is the technical process by which the
> context switch is accomplished. Your userid creates the workitem (a side
> effect of advance with dialog) and then initiates a tRFC to start a new
> logon session for user WF-BATCH, which then executes the workitem.
>
> In other words a tRFC will always appear where the processing switches
> from dialog to background. If you skip the Check Approver step then the
> next background step will show a tRFC.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
> On Wed, September 10, 2008 10:13 pm, Schumacher, Margaret wrote:
> > Yes, I see the User Context and the "Processing Started" log entry has
> > my name and the entry is tRFC ... only the "Processing Complete" and
> > "Result Processing" show WF-BATCH. I can't see the trfc because it says
> > it already processed but would it have processed as me or WF-BATCH?
> > Do you think if I remove the Check Approver step and had it go directly
> > to the "Post parked doc" it would also have the tRFC object?
> >
> >
> > No time to test it today. Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Margaret Schumacher
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Pokraka [mailto:wug at workflowconnections.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:08 PM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the
> > WF-BATCHuser
> >
> > Hi Margaret,
> >
> > When you say:
> > "I might be way off base but I seem to recall that immediate processing
> > of the next step might cary over the prior user's id."
> > you are only slightly off target.
> >
> > Scroll all the way to the right of the log and you'll see a column 'User
> > Context'. This is new as of 620 or thereabouts and will show you the
> > userid the transaction is working under.
> >
> > To put it simply, if the next task is dialog it will be *created* under
> > your user (but placed in the next recipient's inbox); if it's background
> > it will show the log as you pointed out but the context will be
> > WF-BATCH.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > On Wed, September 10, 2008 4:29 pm, Schumacher, Margaret wrote:
> >> Could it be that after the Approval the next step is the background
> >> post which you think is executed by WF-BATCh but really starts with
> >> the User Id of the prior step? I have a step between the approval and
> >> the post that verifies the approver has auth to approve since it might
> >> have been forwarded or substituted. Notice that step 164 has my name
> >> on the processing started log entry. I might be way off base but I
> >> seem to recall that immediate processing of the next step might cary
> > over the
> >> prior user's id. Please tell me if I'm wrong just seem to recall
> >> this might be the case.....
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Margaret Schumacher
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >>
> >> From: Ibrahim Khan [mailto:ikhansap at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:42 AM
> >> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> >> Subject: Re: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the
> >> WF-BATCHuser
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Paul,
> >> I check the Authorization check trace in ST01, everything is fine.
> >> Still can't figure our what could be the issue. I hope authorization
> >> should not be and issue since WF-BATCH have an SAP_ALL authorization.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:51 PM, <Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Ibrahim,
> >>
> >> Have you tried an authorization trace (via ST01) to verify that
> >> WF-BATCH is
> >> actually posting the invoice?
> >>
> >> cheers
> >> Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Ibrahim Khan"
> >> <ikhansap at gmail.c
> >> om>
> >> To
> >> Sent by: "SAP Workflow Users'
> >> Group"
> >> sap-wug-bounces at m <SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
> >> it.edu
> >> cc
> >>
> >>
> >> Subject
> >> 10/09/2008 04:24 Issue while posting the
> >> invoice in
> >> PM background using the
> >> WF-BATCH user
> >>
> >>
> >> Please respond to
> >> "SAP Workflow
> >> Users' Group"
> >> <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Friends,
> >> I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background
> > using
> >> the
> >> WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in
> > when
> >> the
> >> approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted
> > using
> >> a
> >> background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am
> >> returning
> >> the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When
> > i
> >> see the
> >> log an exception is rasied from this method with an error
> > message
> >> "V004:
> >> You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is
> >> having
> >> SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice
> >> using the
> >> method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the
> > issue.
> >> Please advice.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >> **
> >> **********************************************************************
> >> **
> >> ******
> >>
> >> Only an individual or entity who is intended to be a recipient
> > of
> >> this e-mail may access or use the information contained in this e-mail
> >> or any of its attachments. Opinions contained in this e-mail or any
> >> of its attachments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
> >> Queensland Treasury.
> >>
> >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential
> > and
> >> may be legally privileged and the subject of copyright. If you have
> >> received this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland Treasury
> >> immediately and erase all copies of the e-mail and the attachments.
> >> Queensland Treasury uses virus scanning software. However, it is not
> >> liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in any attachment.
> >>
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >> **
> >> **********************************************************************
> >> **
> >> ******
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list