Subject: Re: Exntended notification BSP and SSO
Shai Eyal
shai.eyal at yahoo.com
Thu May 15 03:26:46 EDT 2008
Sharat,
Thanks for your reply. How did you overcome the login pop-up ?
Regards,
Shai Eyal
SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow specialist
Mobile: 972-52-5816633
----- Original Message ----
From: "sap-wug-request at mit.edu" <sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:54:57
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
sap-wug at mit.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sap-wug-request at mit.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: WF Background Jobs (Neumann, Marcia)
2. Re: Exntended notification BSP and SSO (Sharath K)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:29:55 -0400
From: "Neumann, Marcia" <Marcia_Neumann at CINFIN.com>
Subject: RE: WF Background Jobs
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<594CD456E9B52844B448AA77AD1D8E4902DE5FE4 at exchq2.cinfin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We experienced very long runtimes for job SWWCOND on 4.71 and opened a
message with SAP. Based on their responses in September 2005, we
cancelled the job.
Reply from SAP 09/15/2005 04:27:04
I analyzed the problem in your system. We really have a problem with
the performance of report RSWWCOND. Development is aware of that, and
thinking of a redesign of the functionality. For the time being, we
can offer the following solution:
- I checked the definition table SWD_CONDEF. I see that the relevant
conditions are only used in one workflow: WS90200019, step 29. This
step is the 'post' step. It is task TS90200040.
Relevant condition types are only 'PO', 'PR', and 'WA'.
- RSWWCOND really only needs to check conditions for that task number.
So, we can enter this task on the selection screen for RSWWCOND.
The report then runs only 2 seconds, because it can access table
SWWWIHEAD with index C.
- You need to define this selection criteria in a variant, and have
the background job always run with this variant.
- The great disadvantage of this is: any time you change your workflow,
or start working with a new workflow in some application area, you
need to recheck table SWD_CONDEF.
I wonder if this is acceptable to you?
Please let me know.
Best regards,
Workflow Development Support
Reply from SAP 09/16/2005 04:58:20
A redesign of the functionality can not be delivered per support
package.
I ran the report with SQL trace on, and found that index C is not ued.
Please see note 799002, and change the index, and generate it.
Then check note 724614 for anything to be done on the database side
(I am not at all a database expert).
Then please rerun the report with SQL trace (ST05) switched on. The
select should be done by index C then.
If that is not the case, I will need to send this message to the DB2
database experts. In that case, please keep the system connection open
a little longer.
Best regards,
Marcia Neumann
CMS Workflow Administration
IT Claims Development/Support
Phone: (513) 870-2300 ext. 4461
Fax: (513) 603-5388
Confidentiality notice: The information included in this e-mail,
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or similar action is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies of the original message immediately.
________________________________
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Jeffrey A. Rappaport
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:25 AM
To: SWUG (SAP)
Subject: WF Background Jobs
All,
Had a couple of quick questions on the WF Jobs, first being has
anyone seen the job SWWCOND at times take hours to run? Second would be
what the difference is between the 2 DM Jobs SWFSLSDLEX & SWWDHEX & why
there's now 2 jobs for this.
Thanx,
Jeffrey A. Rappaport
Business Workflow, LLC
Voice: +1 (732) 355-0123
Fax: +1 (509) 757-4144
Email: Jeff at Business-Workflow.com
Web: www.Business-Workflow.com
The information contained in this message may be privileged,
confidential and protected from disclosure. If the Reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error and would
like to be removed from any future mailings from this Sender, please hit
'Reply' to this email with "REMOVE" in the Subject line.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080514/9c2df463/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sharath K <ksharath77 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Exntended notification BSP and SSO
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <19365.62388.qm at web39708.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Shai,
We did similar thing in my last project..
Trigger a 'system event/workflow event'?in your BSP?application with required logic and listen to the event in your workflow to continure further..it worked for us...
regds,
Sharath...
----- Original Message ----
From: Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com>
To: sap-wug <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:16:51 AM
Subject: Exntended notification BSP and SSO
Hi all,
?
I've been using the extended notification?to process user decision?task. All works well as follows:
?
1. User receive e-mail to MS-Outlook with Approve and Reject link.
2. Once clicked on Approve and Reject system prompts for user and password.
3. BSP application?message appear that workitem was executed successfully.
4. Workflow continues.
My problem is with step 2 - I wish to avoid?the "user and password" step. I thought?and hoped that having Single sign-on would solve it but it did not.
Any ideas will be appreciated.
?
Thanks in advance,
?
Regards,
Shai Eyal
SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow specialist
Mobile: 972-52-5816633
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080514/c27f8c61/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26
***************************************
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080515/85cc5b73/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list