Approval Limits for Travel Expenses
John A Haworth
jhoworth at csc.com
Fri Jun 6 10:14:33 EDT 2008
Many Thanks Jocelyn. That looks as though its exactly what I need.
Kind Regards
John
CSC Computer Sciences Limited
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK
Registered in England No: 0963578
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
06/06/2008 14:16
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
To
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
cc
Subject
RE: Approval Limits for Travel Expenses
Hi John,
I think you must be looking at the wrong doco. Personalization object
keys have NOTHING to do with Portal iviews.
Look at transaction PERSREG and transaction SPERS_MAINT. If you use the
standard storage the data itself is held in table SPERS_OBJ. A good
example of a matrix type attribute for roles is "RESOURCE" - this shows
how easy it is to create personalization a function module calling
standard table handling routines. You can also very rapidly create a
personalization key using a dictionary structure or table type.
Personalization data is maintained on the Personalization tab of the User
Master (transaction SU01) or the Security Role (transaction PFCG).
Users can only maintain personalization keys if they have access to SU01
and the key has been enabled for user masters (it can be enabled for roles
only) and they have sufficient authorization to maintain the data. There
is no option for changing Personaliation keys via the Portal.
Roles can of course be linked to positions or jobs.
Yes attributes (infotype 1222) assigned to positions or org units are
another possible option. Be aware that to maintain attributes correctly
in this way you MUST use one of the PPOMA* transactions - using PA30,
PO13, or PO10 does not give access to the "attribute scenario" which is
critical to correct maintenance of these attributes.
Key things to consider when deciding which way to go:
* How complex are the attributes? - Matrices are easier to manage via
personalization object keys. Extended attributes are possible but involve
greater coding effort.
* What minimizes the maintenance burden? If your delegations are in a
discrete set of bands then this is easier to manage via security
roles/personalization object keys rather than having to maintain
attributes for every org unit/position. If the delegations are more
subjective, attributes may be better.
* Are the delegations for a user based on the position they hold (.... use
attributes) or their security level (.... use personalization keys on
roles) or are they assigned personally to them (... use personalization
keys on users)?
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jocelyn Dart
Senior Consultant
SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
Level 1/168 Walker St.
North Sydney
NSW, 2060
Australia
T +61 412 390 267
M + 61 412 390 267
E jocelyn.dart at sap.com
http://www.sap.com
The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of this electronic transmission
or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this electronic transmission in error, please immediately contact
the sender to arrange for the return of the original documents.
Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and accordingly,
the sender does not accept liability for any such data corruption,
interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the consequences
thereof.
Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of its
subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors, officers and
employees make no representation nor accept any liability for the accuracy
or completeness of the views or information contained herein. Please be
aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/ business proposal
herein is indicative only, is subject to change and shall not be construed
as an offer or as constituting a binding agreement on the part of SAP AG
or any of its subsidiaries to enter into any relationship, unless
otherwise expressly stated.
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of John A Haworth
Sent: Friday, 06 June 2008 8:47 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: Approval Limits for Travel Expenses
Thanks Jocelyn,
One last question, promise. Is there an advantage of 'Personalisation'
over 'Attributes (PPOMA)' against an organisational unit, my thoughts are
that personalization seem to be for use via iviews and the portal and
could be seen by and potentially changed by the user. Whereas attributes
would be master data and only changed by the relevant authorised person in
Org Management and could be against a Position or Job. I am trying to
represent a delegated list of authority with approval limits, so perhaps
the Attributes approach would be more suited?
Many Thanks
John
CSC Computer Sciences Limited
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK
Registered in England No: 0963578
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
06/06/2008 06:23
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
To
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
cc
Subject
RE: Approval Limits for Travel Expenses
Hi John,
Yes I've used this approach at some sites - especially where the limits
are matrixed - e.g. different limits per travel category. Works well.
Regards,
Jocelyn
________________________________
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of John A Haworth
Sent: Thu 5/06/2008 7:34 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: Approval Limits for Travel Expenses
Thanks for that, and do you think that personalisation would be a suitable
place to hold the 'Approval Amount'?
Again, many thanks for your advice.
Kind Regards
John
CSC Computer Sciences Limited
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK
Registered in England No: 0963578
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
05/06/2008 06:17
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
To
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
cc
Subject
RE: Approval Limits for Travel Expenses
Hi John,
Yes Personalization is available in all SAP ABAP systems since R/3 4.6C.
Only difference is you need to create your own personalization key in
transaction PERSREG and create the necessary coding to read it.
There's a whole section on it in the Help library - look for
Personalization.
Regards,
Jocelyn
________________________________
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of John A Haworth
Sent: Wed 4/06/2008 10:44 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Approval Limits for Travel Expenses
Hi
I am looking in ECC6.0, at where would be best to hold Travel expenses
Approval limits. I remember that in SRM Org Management in the extended
attributes or personalisation there is an approval limit amount, but dont
think this is available in ECC6 Org Management. Has anyone had a similar
issue and any thoughts on where this amount would be best held?
Thanks
Regards
John
CSC Computer Sciences Limited
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK
Registered in England No: 0963578
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080606/fb84a61d/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list