Inbox substitution interrogation

[Mikko Mäki-Rahkola]

Hi James,
please also see report RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE. Very useful for seeing &
maintaining peoples' substitutes, but unfortunately it doesn't work
the other way around for seeing user substitutions..

Kind regards,
Mikko

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:36 AM,  <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of Dart, Jocelyn
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:30 AM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: Inbox substitution interrogation
>
>
>
> Look at the SAP_WAPI  function modules - there's a bunch on working with
> substitutes
>
> E.g. SAP_WAPI_SUBSTITUES_GET, SAP_WAPI_SUBSTITUTIONS_GET which would
> give you the answers to both those questions
>
> and they are all date delimited
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Jocelyn Dart
> Senior Consultant
> SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
> Level 1/168 Walker St.
> North Sydney
> NSW, 2060
> Australia
> T   +61 412 390 267
> M   + 61 412 390 267
> E   jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/>
>
> The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
> is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for
> the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,
> copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this
> electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
> please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the
> original documents.
>
> Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and
> accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data
> corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the
> consequences thereof.
>
> Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
> sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of
> its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,
> officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability
> for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained
> herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/
> business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and
> shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding
> agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into
> any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of James J Seiter
> Sent: Saturday, 12 July 2008 4:19 AM
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: Inbox substitution interrogation
>
>
> ECC6
>
> Looking for a method of interrogating what Inbox substitutions have been
> made to a userid, both forwards and backwards.
> 1) Which users has USERA designated as substitutes.  USERA designated
> USERB and USERC.
> 2) Which users have designated USERA as a substitute.  USERX and USERZ
> designated USERA.
>
> Aware of table HRUS_D2, but looking for a transaction / report to avoid
> customization.
> FM RH_SUBSTITUTES_LIST is only forward looking...USERA designated USERB
> and USERC.
>
> Need method of determining what users have designated USERA as
> substitute...USERX and USERZ designated USERA.
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> James
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080717/e121bcf9/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 44, Issue 42
> ***************************************
>