SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 39, Issue 71

Wed Feb 27 14:44:49 EST 2008

Hi Sue,

 Can you delete the result processing step and re-create the same and also the bindings (if there are not many dependent steps on the result processing step ), i know there must be dependencies after that step),it has worked for me before...so just give it a try....

Thanks,
Yogesh

yogesh "not a failure but a low aim is a crime"> From: sap-wug-request at mit.edu> Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 39, Issue 71> To: sap-wug at mit.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:53:40 -0500> > Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to> sap-wug at mit.edu> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to> sap-wug-request at mit.edu> > You can reach the person managing the list at> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."> > > Today's Topics:> > 1. Re: RE: Antwort: Number range object for Workflow task-ID's?> (Mike Pokraka)> 2. RE: Condition step not working in Workflow (Sue Doughty)> 3. RE: viewing IXOS images via the UWL (Zavier, Johnson)> 4. RE: Condition step not working in Workflow (Mike Pokraka)> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------> > Message: 1> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:47:40 -0000 (UTC)> From: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>> Subject: Re: RE: Antwort: Number range object for Workflow task-ID's?> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>> Message-ID:> <63042.212.157.1.1.1204127260.squirrel at workflowconnections.com.mail.aaisp.net.uk>> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1> > Hi Florin,> > It is particularly this situation which makes different prefixes useful as> it's easier to spot where/when something was created.> > In any case, transaction PF05 is what you're after, but I see you already> found the long way round.> > Cheers,> Mike> > > On Wed, February 27, 2008 2:14 pm, Florin Wach wrote:> > @Keith> >> > We have moved the development from one system to another, keeping the> > existing prefix (as this is a multi-multi-multi system client), but the> > number range wasn't copied (correctly).> >> >> > @Christian> >> > With transaction SNUM you can modify the number range's next free no.> >> >> >> > Best wishes and thanks for the help,> > Florin> >> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------> >> Datum: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:06:48 -0000> >> Von: "Gardiner, Keith (CISS IT)" <Keith.Gardiner at capita.co.uk>> >> An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>> >> Betreff: RE: Antwort: Number range object for Workflow task-ID\'s?> >> >> Hi Florin,> >>> >> Why don't you have a new prefix code for your new development system.> >>> >>> >> Regards> >>> >> Keith Gardiner> >>> >>> >> -----Original Message-----> >> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf> >> Of Florin Wach> >> Sent: 27 February 2008 14:03> >> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group> >> Subject: Re: Antwort: Number range object for Workflow task-ID's?> >>> >> hrm... I mean: "The next number, which is assigned to a new object". So> >> I don't want to change the ID of something existing, just to make sure> >> to get correct numbers for new workflows, as we have moved the> >> Dev.-System.> >>> >>> >>> >> -------- Original-Nachricht --------> >> > Datum: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:56:48 +0100> >> > Von: "Christian Wallner" <C.Wallner at ats.net>> >> > An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>> >> > Betreff: Antwort: Number range object for Workflow task-ID\'s?> >>> >> > Hi Florin,> >> >> >> > As far as I know, no :-(> >> >> >> > cheers,> >> > chris> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Florin Wach" <florin.wach at gmx.net>> >> > Gesendet von: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu> >> > 27.02.2008 14:47> >> > Bitte antworten an> >> > "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>> >> >> >> >> >> > An> >> > "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu> Kopie> >> >> >> > Thema> >> > Number range object for Workflow task-ID's?> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi,> >> >> >> > (where) is it possible to change the numbers assigned to new tasks,> >> > such as WS901<numberCounter>, TS9xx<numberCounter>.> >> >> >> > So I'm not talking about the prefix numbers 9xx, but I'm looking for a> >>> >> > number range object.> >> >> >> > It doesn't seem to be the HRWFOBJECT> >> >> >> >> >> > Any help?> >> > Florin> >> > _______________________________________________> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >> >> >> >> >> > AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG Legal form | Rechtsform:> >> > Aktiengesellschaft Registered office | Sitz: Fabriksgasse 13, 8700> >> > Leoben, Austria Commercial Register Number | Firmenbuchnummer: FN> >> > 55638 x, Landesgericht Leoben> >> >> >> > This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and/or> >> > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have> >>> >> > received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately> >> > and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or> >> > distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.> >> _______________________________________________> >> SAP-WUG mailing list> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >>> >> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan> >> service.> >>> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may> >> be> >> subject to legal privilege, and are intended solely for the use of the> >> individual or entity to whom they are addressed.> >> If you have received this email in error or think you may have done so,> >> you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message.> >> Please> >> notify the sender immediately and delete the original e-mail from your> >> system.> >>> >> _______________________________________________> >> SAP-WUG mailing list> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> > _______________________________________________> > SAP-WUG mailing list> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >> > > > > ------------------------------> > Message: 2> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:11:09 -0500> From: "Sue Doughty" <Sue.Doughty at odfl.com>> Subject: RE: Condition step not working in Workflow> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>> Message-ID:> <082C942F46528B44B5463D3C2A1FF0F40E5BAB64 at corp-m-exch2.corp.odfl.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> > Hi Mike,> > Thanks for your reply.> > I am not using a result parameter even though I tried that when it did> not work the way I had it at first. Neither way works. I can see in> the workflow log that my export parameter (ImageFound) is being> populated with the correct 'T' or 'F' value, but the Results processing> step is not being executed with an F value - it only executes when the> export parameter contains a 'T' value.> > I can't use a virtual attribute because the input parameters to the> method change with each call to the method (i.e., doctype and> imagedate).> > Regards,> Sue T. Doughty> SAP Workflow Specialist> Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.> 500 Old Dominion Way> Thomasville, NC 27360> Phone: (336) 822-5189> Toll Free (800 ) 432-6335, ext. 5189> Email: sue.doughty at odfl.com> -----Original Message-----> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf> Of Mike Pokraka> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:44 AM> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group> Subject: Re: Condition step not working in Workflow> > Hi Sue,> Are you using a standard return parameter or a result parameter?> ("Result> parameter" checkbox on your method properties).> Result parameters behave differently, T/F must be defined within the> data> dictionary and become separate outcomes of the method.> Also, perhaps a virtual attribute might be easier if this is all that> the> method does...> > Cheers,> Mike> > On Tue, February 26, 2008 5:06 pm, Sue Doughty wrote:> > We are on 4.7, ECC 6.0> >> >> >> > I have a sub-workflow that executes a loop until a result flag is set> to> > T. It executes a method that reads a table with some information. If> > the record is found, the result is set to T, if not it is set to F and> > the result container is set in the method. The next step is a> condition> > to check the result. If T, the loop and sub-workflow are completed,> if> > F, it waits and tries again after five minutes.> >> >> >> > My problem: If the method executes and the result is T, the workflow> > works as designed. If the method returns a result of F, the workflow> > stops at that step and does not move to the condition step to check> the> > result.> >> >> >> > I can see that the method is returning the result container. If the> > Result = T, I can see that the Result container is sent back to the> > sub-workflow. When I look at the step in the log, it says that the> > background item was created, started, work item processing is complete> > and the result processing is done with no errors.> >> >> >> > If the Result is F, I can see that the method is returning the result> > container, but the workflow container does NOT get set to the Result.> > When I look at the step in the log, it says that the background item> was> > created; started and work item processing is complete with no errors,> > BUT the Result Processing is NOT done.> >> >> >> > What am I missing? Why is the Result processing being done for one> > result but not the other?> >> >> >> > Regards,> >> > Sue T. Doughty> >> > SAP Workflow Specialist> >> > Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.> >> > 500 Old Dominion Way> >> > Thomasville, NC 27360> >> > Phone: (336) 822-5189> >> > Toll Free (800 ) 432-6335, ext. 5189> >> > Email: sue.doughty at odfl.com> >> >> >> > ****************************> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may> be> > confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt> from> > disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended> recipient,> > or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not> authorized to> > read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message, any part of it,> or> > any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please> delete> > this message and any attachments from your system without reading the> > content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent> transmission.> > Thank you for your cooperation.> >> > _______________________________________________> > SAP-WUG mailing list> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >> > > _______________________________________________> SAP-WUG mailing list> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> > > ****************************> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message, any part of it, or any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message and any attachments from your system without reading the content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission. Thank you for your cooperation.> > > > ------------------------------> > Message: 3> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:11:33 -0700> From: "Zavier, Johnson" <JZavier at Suncor.com>> Subject: RE: viewing IXOS images via the UWL> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>> Message-ID:> <FDDCD89534C5E84C8E635452F3B8A0ABEC57B8 at MAILPRD013.network.lan>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"> > Similar issue happened to me few years back and I remember it was rectified with upgrading the JAVA Viewer. > > thanks> Johnson Zavier> SAP ABAP/Workflow > 1724D> Suncor Energy Inc.> Work: (403) 693 1893> e-mail: jzavier at suncor.com> > -----Original Message-----> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Mikko M?ki-Rahkola> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 6:53 AM> To: sap-wug at mit.edu> Subject: Re: viewing IXOS images via the UWL> > Hi Karl,> I remember bumping into the same problem a while ago so here are my comments..> > I assume you are using a before method IMAGE-DISPLAY or similar on the task to display the invoice image just before launching a FI transaction, correct? If yes, the reason why you're most likely to get the error is because ITS isn't set up correctly.> > But don't worry about this problem - ITS and SAP GUI for HTML> (=webgui) based work item execution with a separate invoice image display will not meet your requirements even though it would be set up. The reason for this is that ITS/SAP GUI for HTML doesn't support multiple sessions which you require in order to display the invoice image in the first session and the transaction in the other session.> OSS confirmed this to me last autumn in a customer message.> > So you're basically left with two alternative options:> 1. SAP GUI for Windows> - in this option you will have to visualize(=display) the work item in the UWL with SAP GUI for Windows. This means that when you execute the work item SAP GUI for Windows is launched within the next step in another window (depending on your config) and you will get two SAP GUI sessions open, one with the transaction and the second with the invoice image.> - in order to accomplish this, you need to adjust the UWL item type configuration for the task you are executing. Basically the only thing required is setting the GuiType property to WinGui so it will launch wingui instead of webgui. For more details on this, please see the UWL config on help.sap.com and especially http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/af/ce571400fa458a8ad8936fdd49d75a/frameset.htm> > 2. Direct IXOS lookup> - here you would have a custom action defined for the UWL item which would launch the invoice image with a separate click in another window and the transaction itself would be launched with wingui/webgui in another window when executing the work item> - the drawback is that this is more difficult and IXOS may not support it at all (not sure since I haven't worked with it that much) but basically here UWL would directly call the invoice image in IXOS without a roundtrip to SAP ERP> - what this requires is> 1. IXOS for example exposing the invoice image display through an HTTP interface meaning that you could display any stored invoice image by calling a specific URL with correct parameters and 2. the UWL configured to have a custom defined action against your task and the action to launch a URL with parameters (e.g. invoice image ID) fetched from the work item container> > A third option may also be to create a custom transaction which would show the transaction next to the invoice image, all in one session.> But this would of course require quite a bit of effort especially compared to the options above which can be done in hours instead of days or weeks.> > Hope this helps,> > Mikko M?ki-Rahkola> Nobultec Ltd> > > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:47:31 +1100> > From: "Nietz, Karl K" <Karl.Nietz at BHPBilliton.com>> > Subject: viewing IXOS images via the UWL> > To: <sap-wug at mit.edu>> > Message-ID:> > > > <5372E2FBE781494DA8D1D34E71BC73177A02F2 at ENTMEL-XCH05.apac.ent.bhpbilli> > ton.net>> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> >> >> > Hi,> >> > We have scanned IXOS images (invoices etc) attached to workitems in a > > backend 4.7 system. These are created via the ArchiveLink technology > > using transaction OAWD.> >> > We can see the workitems rendered in the Universal Worklist > > successfully but when we attempt to execute a workitem where the IXOS > > image is displayed, or click on the hotlink attachment for the IXOS > > image, an error occurs. It seems that the IXOS viewer cannot be > > started-up from within the UWL.> >> > Is it possible to configure the UWL or ITS so that IXOS documents can > > be viewed in the UWL?> >> > Karl Nietz> > Workflow Support Team Leader> > CSC Melbourne> > Ph: 61 3 86951157> > Mob: 61 434 181303> > _______________________________________________> SAP-WUG mailing list> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> This e-mail contains confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the e-mail or the information it contains, is strictly forbidden.> > > > ------------------------------> > Message: 4> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:13:26 -0000 (UTC)> From: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>> Subject: RE: Condition step not working in Workflow> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>> Message-ID:> <38396.212.157.1.1.1204132406.squirrel at workflowconnections.com.mail.aaisp.net.uk>> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1> > Hmm, not too sure then. I thought I'd mention as it would be worth> checking. Also make sure your data type is valid for the values. Try> changing it to SY-INPUT just to make sure.> > On Wed, February 27, 2008 4:11 pm, Sue Doughty wrote:> > Hi Mike,> >> > Thanks for your reply.> >> > I am not using a result parameter even though I tried that when it did> > not work the way I had it at first. Neither way works. I can see in> > the workflow log that my export parameter (ImageFound) is being> > populated with the correct 'T' or 'F' value, but the Results processing> > step is not being executed with an F value - it only executes when the> > export parameter contains a 'T' value.> >> > I can't use a virtual attribute because the input parameters to the> > method change with each call to the method (i.e., doctype and> > imagedate).> >> > Regards,> > Sue T. Doughty> > SAP Workflow Specialist> > Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.> > 500 Old Dominion Way> > Thomasville, NC 27360> > Phone: (336) 822-5189> > Toll Free (800 ) 432-6335, ext. 5189> > Email: sue.doughty at odfl.com> > -----Original Message-----> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf> > Of Mike Pokraka> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:44 AM> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group> > Subject: Re: Condition step not working in Workflow> >> > Hi Sue,> > Are you using a standard return parameter or a result parameter?> > ("Result> > parameter" checkbox on your method properties).> > Result parameters behave differently, T/F must be defined within the> > data> > dictionary and become separate outcomes of the method.> > Also, perhaps a virtual attribute might be easier if this is all that> > the> > method does...> >> > Cheers,> > Mike> >> > On Tue, February 26, 2008 5:06 pm, Sue Doughty wrote:> >> We are on 4.7, ECC 6.0> >>> >>> >>> >> I have a sub-workflow that executes a loop until a result flag is set> > to> >> T. It executes a method that reads a table with some information. If> >> the record is found, the result is set to T, if not it is set to F and> >> the result container is set in the method. The next step is a> > condition> >> to check the result. If T, the loop and sub-workflow are completed,> > if> >> F, it waits and tries again after five minutes.> >>> >>> >>> >> My problem: If the method executes and the result is T, the workflow> >> works as designed. If the method returns a result of F, the workflow> >> stops at that step and does not move to the condition step to check> > the> >> result.> >>> >>> >>> >> I can see that the method is returning the result container. If the> >> Result = T, I can see that the Result container is sent back to the> >> sub-workflow. When I look at the step in the log, it says that the> >> background item was created, started, work item processing is complete> >> and the result processing is done with no errors.> >>> >>> >>> >> If the Result is F, I can see that the method is returning the result> >> container, but the workflow container does NOT get set to the Result.> >> When I look at the step in the log, it says that the background item> > was> >> created; started and work item processing is complete with no errors,> >> BUT the Result Processing is NOT done.> >>> >>> >>> >> What am I missing? Why is the Result processing being done for one> >> result but not the other?> >>> >>> >>> >> Regards,> >>> >> Sue T. Doughty> >>> >> SAP Workflow Specialist> >>> >> Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.> >>> >> 500 Old Dominion Way> >>> >> Thomasville, NC 27360> >>> >> Phone: (336) 822-5189> >>> >> Toll Free (800 ) 432-6335, ext. 5189> >>> >> Email: sue.doughty at odfl.com> >>> >>> >>> >> ****************************> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may> > be> >> confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt> > from> >> disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended> > recipient,> >> or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the> >> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not> > authorized to> >> read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message, any part of it,> > or> >> any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please> > delete> >> this message and any attachments from your system without reading the> >> content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent> > transmission.> >> Thank you for your cooperation.> >>> >> _______________________________________________> >> SAP-WUG mailing list> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________> > SAP-WUG mailing list> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >> >> > ****************************> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be> > confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from> > disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,> > or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to> > read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message, any part of it, or> > any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please delete> > this message and any attachments from your system without reading the> > content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission.> > Thank you for your cooperation.> >> > _______________________________________________> > SAP-WUG mailing list> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >> > > > > ------------------------------> > _______________________________________________> SAP-WUG mailing list> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> > > End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 39, Issue 71> ***************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080227/9329472c/attachment.htm