2-Way Workflow?

[Ashish Nagpal]

Hi jake
what ramanan has said worked very well.I have developed one myself
exactly like that.Just go by it.You will be better off.
Regards
ashish

On 2/6/08, Srinivasan Ramanan <r_m_n_n at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jake,
> It is a really difficult to decide whether to settle for nesting. But you do
> not have to really have template in a template. Just consider this proposal.
>  When the part is released with 'Buy' and buyer receives the work item.
> Buyer thinks it is manufactured.
> -> Buyer will reject.
> -> then execute a background step and set the status of the material as
> in-process.
> -> send an e-mail to the agent(s) who is responsible for release.
> -> End the workflow.
>
> Then The agent will again correct the MRP view and set the part as released.
> -> same template will trigger and you are all set.
>
> Cheers
> SRamanan
>
>
> Subject: RE: 2-Way Workflow?Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:58:58 +0800From:
> jocelyn.dart at sap.comTo: sap-wug at mit.edu
>
>
> Hi Jake,
> Surely a simple LOOP UNTIL (second user has approved) step would cover it
> for a scenario that simple?
> Or if it's really more complex, you might want to create your own events to
> trigger the different templates rather than nest things.
> Regards,
> Jocelyn
>
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of Schmidt, Jake (SN)Sent: Wed
> 6/02/2008 3:33 AMTo: sap-wug at mit.eduSubject: 2-Way Workflow?
>
> Greetings WUG,
> Currently I have a material workflow that is "1-Way".  If the first user
> classifies the material incorrectly then the next user has no way to send it
> back to the first user.
> The scenario I'd like to accomplish is this.  User A releases a material.
> Workflow evaluates if material is Fabbed or Purchased.  Workflow sends a
> work item accordingly.  If the buyer receives the work item and finds that
> the part should actually be fabbed, he should reject the work item.  At this
> point can I make the workflow restart at step 000224 (User A releasing
> material) in my workflow?  Currently I don't think thats possible.  From
> what I understand I need to break my existing workflow up into peices and
> then I can have each peice recalled when necessary.  My thinking is I'll
> have templates inside of templates inside of templates.  I know this would
> work but I don't think it's very elegant.  Please advise if there is a
> better way to accomplish my goal!
>
> Jake Schmidt
> Spirit Aerosystems
> _________________________________________________________________
> Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!
> http://biggestloser.msn.com/


-- 
life is all about the moments that take ur heart away