Workflow Configuration

[Munday,Sherie J.]

Cathy,
The workflow configuration may show a red light for the development portion; however, that is to be expected in an environment where you do not develop.  It does not mean that your configuration is incomplete.  This was easier to see in the older versions where development was more clearly separated in the SWU3 transaction.
Cheers,
Sherie 

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:34 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Workflow Configuration


I've always updated the number range in QA and PRD.  Otherwise your workflow configuration will not be complete.  
 
Cathy

praveen rajendran <praveen.rajen at gmail.com> wrote:

	Thanks for the info Ronen...
	but I've have couple of doubts in this...
	I've maintained the number ranges like this, in the development system. 
	999 for DEV
	900 fro QA
	910 for PRD
	Is this ok to do this just in Development system or should i also do this in QA and PRD??? 
	
	Secondly,
	   when I use report program RHMOVE30 to create transport request for my Org structure, Is that enough if I transport Organization Unit in top hierarchy and will those Org Units and positions below  automatically included into that request or should I add each Org unit one by one into the request??? 
	
	Regards,
	PB
	
	
	On 3/8/07, ×¨×•× ×Ÿ פוקס <ronenf at paz.co.il> wrote: 

		Hello,
		For the number prefix: there is no real need to maintain this in your QA & PROD environment since you probably won't be doing any development in those environment. you can transport the prefix setting from DEV to those systems just in order to get a "green traffic light" in transaction SWU3 in those systems.
		 
		Regarding org units and positions: you can use report RHMOVE30 to transport your org. structure between systems. the reason you don't get a change request prompt each time you modify your org. plan in dev is probably because the 'transport link' for HR objects is deactivated in your DEV system.
		 
		Cheers,
		Ronen
		

			-----Original Message-----
			From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu> ] On Behalf Of praveen rajendran
			Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:47 PM
			To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
			Subject: Workflow Configuration
			
			
			Hi,
			  We are implementing workflow for our company. We did initial configuration, Prefix number config and stuffs. We are using 999 in development system, should we use the same in QA and production system also????? 
			We have created simple organizational structure with various positions and users assigned to the positions. how to transport this Organization structure to QA and PRD systems?? Coz, we don see any transport requests for this.. even it didn't ask for saving in transport request when we created it. After transporting, will those position numbers be same as Position numbers in QA and subsequently PRD??? Because we have directly used these postions as agents in workflow tasks... Are we going in right track??? What can be other issues we might possibly run into??? 
			Thanks for your help...
			
			Regards,
			   PB 


		_______________________________________________
		SAP-WUG mailing list
		SAP-WUG at mit.edu
		http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
		
		




	-- 
	Thanks and Regards,
	Praveen Rajendran _______________________________________________
	SAP-WUG mailing list
	SAP-WUG at mit.edu
	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
	


________________________________

Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels 
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel <http://travel.yahoo.com/hotelsearchpage;_ylc=X3oDMTFtaTIzNXVjBF9TAzk3NDA3NTg5BF9zAzI3MTk0ODEEcG9zAzIEc2VjA21haWx0YWdsaW5lBHNsawNxMS0wNw-->  to find your fit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20070313/04909cda/attachment.htm