Deadline notification to workitem agent

[Sample, Rick]

That is my point!

>From my understanding, a batch user _should_ be a SYSTEM type user. 
WF-BATCH _should_ be a COMMUNICATIONS type user. 

>>"There are some performance efficiencies in using the correct type of
user for the purpose intended."
>> Per Jocelyn Dart.

Can someone please explain to me if this has changed for greater than
4.6c release.

Rick


________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Nat 4 Govender
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 7:39 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Cc: SAP Workflow Users' Group; sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
Subject: RE: Deadline notification to workitem agent



Hi Rick,

WF-Batch is not only used for Deadline Monitoring.
All the background task are executed using user WF-Batch.

Regards

Nat Govender
Toyota South Africa
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist
Internal Ext. : 32645
Direct Line : +27 031 910 2645
Fax : +27 031 902 9633 / +27 031 910 4964
E-mail : ngovender4 at toyota.co.za

=============================================
Never test the depth of the water with both feet. 
=============================================
Inactive hide details for "Sample, Rick" <Rick.Sample at gbe.com>"Sample,
Rick" <Rick.Sample at gbe.com>




				"Sample, Rick" <Rick.Sample at gbe.com> 
				Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu 

				2007/08/22 02:28 PM 
								Please
respond to
				"SAP Workflow Users' Group"
<sap-wug at mit.edu>
					



To
	
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>	


cc
	
	


Subject
	
RE: Deadline notification to workitem agent	
	 	

Speaking of DL monitoring, in 4.6c the user was DDIC. 
After upgrading to ECC6, the DL user by default is WF-BATCH. 

One of my basis folk is saying they need to keep it WF-BATCH. Me thinks
this is incorrect. 
Opinions / thoughts?

Rick Sample
SAP Business Workflow Developer
Graybar, Inc.





________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Pyc
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 7:15 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Deadline notification to workitem agent


A couple of options

1 - Resolve the agent in a previous step so that you have it in the
container to pass to 168
2 - Create a new rule which you pass the same data as the original which
goes a step further and finds the supervisor. 

Have fun,
Mark


On 8/22/07, Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com> wrote: 

Hello all,
 
I have this intuitive requirement but I can't seem to solve it: 
Workitem is created and agent assigned via rule, say position X.
In case latest end has reached I would like to notify the
supersior of position X.
 
How can I do that ? rule 168 provides the superior, however
workitem container doesn't hold the assigned agents...
 
Any ideas ?
 
Thanks in advance,

 

Regards,
Shai Eyal

SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow specialist
Mobile: 972-52-5816633



________________________________

For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For
Good <http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html>  this
month. 

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug





_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug



________________________________


This message is a privileged and private communication and may be
read,copied and used only by the intended recipient(s). If you are not
an intended recipient, please let us know by return email. Please then
delete the message and do not disclose its contents to any person.
Neither the sender nor Toyota South Africa Motors accepts any liability
whatsoever as a result of the further dissemination of this message.
Whilst all reasonable steps are taken to avoid corruption of data or
information, we do not accept any liability should such corruption
occur.