Deadline Monitoring

[Gavin Mooney]

Vijay,

This has been discussed many times on the WUG, including just last
week in the post called "Deadlines based on factory calendar - is The
Book wrong?".

It shouldn't be too hard to find.

Regards,
Gavin

2006/10/6, vijay srikanth <vijay_d15 at hotmail.com>:
> Hi Jocelyn,
>
> I couldn't extract a good enough search query to retrieve the points on the
> BPM Forum. Could you post some links from that, or render a good enough
> query for retrieval?
>
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
>
> >From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
> >Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >Subject: RE: Deadline Monitoring
> >Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:57:36 +0800
> >
> >Vijay,
> >You need factory calendar based deadlines.  There's a section on it in
> >The Book.
> >Also a fair few forum points on the BPM forum of sdn.sap.com
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Jocelyn Dart
> >Senior Consultant
> >SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
> >Level 1/168 Walker St.
> >North Sydney
> >NSW, 2060
> >Australia
> >T   +61 412 390 267
> >M   + 61 412 390 267
> >E   jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> >http://www.sap.com
> >
> >The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
> >is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for
> >the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
> >intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,
> >copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this
> >electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly
> >prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
> >please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the
> >original documents.
> >Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and
> >accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data
> >corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the
> >consequences thereof.
> >Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
> >individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
> >sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of
> >its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,
> >officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability
> >for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained
> >herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/
> >business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and
> >shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding
> >agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into
> >any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated.
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> >Of vijay srikanth
> >Sent: Friday, 06 October 2006 4:46 PM
> >To: sap-wug at mit.edu; sap.wug at mit.edu
> >Subject: Deadline Monitoring
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >We have a requirement in workflows where the escalations for deadline
> >missed
> >should not consider the weekends. The latest end is to be fixed at 2
> >days
> >after receiving the workitem. Saturday and Sunday have to be omitted
> >from
> >this count. Is this achievable? Alternatively can we use a calendar so
> >that
> >other holidays are also not considered?
> >
> >
> >Please advice.
> >Regards,
> >Vijay
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >SAP-WUG mailing list
> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >SAP-WUG mailing list
> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>