SRM Shopping Cart preview error
bailleul_s@hotmail.com
bailleul_s at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 29 04:30:19 EDT 2006
Hi Jocelyn,
Unfortunately I have checked the agent assignment of the main workflow and on the subworkflow and there is no difference between D and Q.
I had already checked the Ad Hoc possibilities .
Is there any known issues with the preview ?
For the Local PO I have no problem and on the Shopping cart with the Non Approval Workflow the applet is also working so as it seemed related to the template of this specific workflow I have re-transported all the workflow template involved but it is still not working
Any other ideas ?
Cheers
Stephane
------ MESSAGE ORIGINE------
De: sap-wug-request at mit.edu
A: sap-wug at mit.edu
Envoyé: 28/06/2006 06:22:42
Objet: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 19, Issue 72
> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> sap-wug at mit.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. RE: SRM Shopping Cart preview error (Dart, Jocelyn)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:22:22 +0800
> From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
> Subject: RE: SRM Shopping Cart preview error
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <F843AF000027394A9F3D3194109269F45E170F at sgsine11.sin.sap.corp>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Stephane,
>
> Go to the workflow builder (transaction SWDD), bring up the workflows, go to the basic data area (hat icon), check the properties of the workflow - check ad hoc agent assignment is possible. Sounds like someone may have accidentally turned it off. If that's the case try retransporting your workflow.
>
> Also check that the agent assignment to the workflow level itself (not to the approval step) is the same in DEV and QA.
> In which case you can use program RHMOVE30 to transport the assignments to the WS object.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Jocelyn Dart
> Senior Consultant
> SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
> Level 1/168 Walker St.
> North Sydney
> NSW, 2060
> Australia
> T +61 412 390 267
> M + 61 412 390 267
> E jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/>
>
> The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the original documents.
>
> Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the consequences thereof.
>
> Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors, officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/ business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of St?phane Bailleul
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2006 1:48 PM
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: SRM Shopping Cart preview error
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> We are using the standard Badi workflow WS14000134 & WS14000133 with
> the standard decision task TS10008126 ( general task)
>
> The preview is working on our Development system and not on the quality
> system. I have checked the task, Business object, rule to determine
> the agent and the BADI all are set up in the same way
>
> The message that we have on the preview is the following:
> "Approval step without ad-hoc capability. No preview possible"
>
> The agent determination is done in the business object . When the shopping cart is on hold or saved I can see that the approvers are calculated correctly.
> The workflow runs perfectly well, but only the preview is causing us problem
> Can you help me if you have any idea of the possible origin of this problem ?
> Technical information:
> SAPKA64016 Cross-Application Component
> SAPKB64016 SAP Basis Component
> SAPKIPYJ64 Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) 2005_1_640
> SAPKITLPS1 SAP Solution Tools Plug-In (ST-PI 003C_6
> SAPKW35014 Business Information Warehouse
> SAPKIBKS08 SRM_SERVER
> SAPK-26404INCCM CCM 200_640 : Add-On Delta Upgrade
>
>
>
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephane
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> > From: sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> > Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 19, Issue 70
> > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:43:25 -0400
> >
> > Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> > sap-wug at mit.edu
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry (Dart, Jocelyn)
> > 2. RE: Validation of selected substitutes ? (Dart, Jocelyn)
> > 3. EBP Worflow Trigger issue with multiple lines in SC (D Duchon)
> > 4. RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry (jerry.martinek)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:30:12 +0800
> > From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
> > Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID:
> > <F843AF000027394A9F3D3194109269F45E15A7 at sgsine11.sin.sap.corp>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Jerry,
> > Again this is possible and relatively uncomplicated to do from Extended
> > Notifications.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jocelyn Dart
> > Senior Consultant
> > SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
> > Level 1/168 Walker St.
> > North Sydney
> > NSW, 2060
> > Australia
> > T +61 412 390 267
> > M + 61 412 390 267
> > E jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> > http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/>
> >
> > The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
> > is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for
> > the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,
> > copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this
> > electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
> > please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the
> > original documents.
> >
> > Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and
> > accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data
> > corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the
> > consequences thereof.
> >
> > Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
> > individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
> > sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of
> > its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,
> > officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability
> > for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained
> > herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/
> > business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and
> > shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding
> > agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into
> > any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> > Of jerry.martinek
> > Sent: Monday, 26 June 2006 4:09 AM
> > To: 'SAP Workflow Users' Group'
> > Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> >
> >
> > That's what I was afraid of. What I want is a generic, common notice and
> > not a task description informing the approver that they have a
> > pending/waiting request in their UWL. Sort of similar to the UWL based
> > substitutions. I don't want to have multiple instance of this job, one
> > per SAP system. Furthermore what I need is an URL in the email that
> > takes them to the UWL folder directly from Outlook.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the confirmation.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> > Of Mark Pyc
> > Sent: June 25, 2006 12:47 AM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: Re: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry
> >
> >
> >
> > G'day Jerry,
> >
> > I can appreciate that what you're after is an UWL equivalent of
> > RSWUWFML2. i.e. like the UWL it would be central and only configured
> > once rather than in each backend system, but I don't think such
> > functionality exists. I think you just have to set up RSWUWFML2 in each
> > system.
> >
> > Have fun,
> > Mark
> >
> > On 6/25/06, jerry.martinek <jerry.martinek at shawbiz.ca> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Is it possible to setup an UWL triggered email notification process if
> > the owner receives a workitem in their UWL? It's sort of the opposite
> > functionality of the UWL Alerts. The goal is to let the selected person
> > know that they have a waiting approval request in their UWL inbox.
> >
> >
> >
> > I've read through the documentation on the UWL but I couldn't find
> > anything on this subject.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060628/b783a462/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:34:25 +0800
> > From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
> > Subject: RE: Validation of selected substitutes ?
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at MIT.EDU>
> > Message-ID:
> > <F843AF000027394A9F3D3194109269F45E15A9 at sgsine11.sin.sap.corp>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Sue,
> >
> > Yes we have asked for BADIs but no official word yet on when or whether
> > they will be introduced. However if you are using the UWL with SRM
> > (which you are I seem to remember?)
> > - a mod in the relevant SAP_WAPI_SUBSTITUTE_CREATE function module will
> > do it. I've done this before at another project ... this is where we've
> > asked for the user-exit to be placed. You'll still have to put
> > together your own logic for deciding what is an attribute match.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jocelyn Dart
> > Senior Consultant
> > SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
> > Level 1/168 Walker St.
> > North Sydney
> > NSW, 2060
> > Australia
> > T +61 412 390 267
> > M + 61 412 390 267
> > E jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> > http://www.sap.com
> >
> > The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
> > is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for
> > the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,
> > copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this
> > electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
> > please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the
> > original documents.
> > Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and
> > accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data
> > corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the
> > consequences thereof.
> > Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
> > individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
> > sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of
> > its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,
> > officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability
> > for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained
> > herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/
> > business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and
> > shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding
> > agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into
> > any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at MIT.EDU [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at MIT.EDU] On Behalf
> > Of Susan R. Keohan
> > Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2006 5:23 AM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: Validation of selected substitutes ?
> >
> > SRM 5.0,
> > Here's a weird one (what else do I ever send?)
> >
> > Certain approvers have strange and amazing powers, and it's important
> > that they not select
> > substitutes who do not also possess these same powers. Let's say these
> > strange and amazing powers
> > are manifest in SAP Authorizations, and SAP Org Objects, and SAP
> > Qualifications (HR).
> > We are resolving all our workflow tasks to the person level (positional
> > substitution does not apply).
> >
> > Is there anyway to check when a user picks a substitute, that the
> > substitute has the same attributes
> > as the picker ? (no really, please, don't laugh)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Susan R. Keohan
> > SAP Workflow Developer
> > MIT Lincoln Laboratory
> > 244 Wood Street
> > LI-200
> > Lexington, MA. 02420
> > 781-981-3561
> > keohan at ll.mit.edu
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:37:03 -0500
> > From: "D Duchon" <duchond at comcast.net>
> > Subject: EBP Worflow Trigger issue with multiple lines in SC
> > To: <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID:
> > <200606280137.k5S1bAWr009677 at pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hello, I have an issue with EBP start conditions based on the material
> > group (prod category in EBP), my workflow is being triggered correctly for
> > shopping carts with one line item, But if I have a SC with multiple lines
> > the workflow is not trigged. Any suggestions? Should I be using
> > MaterialGroupList? If yes, how do you maintain a list. Using EBP v5.0
> >
> >
> >
> > Many thanks-
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060627/bbdb4c6f/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:43:20 -0700
> > From: "jerry.martinek" <jerry.martinek at shawbiz.ca>
> > Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry
> > To: "'SAP Workflow Users' Group'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID: <0J1J0006EU889D20 at bpd2mi5no.prod.shawcable.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hi Jocelyn,
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank for the feedback, I'll read up on this topic.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
> > Dart, Jocelyn
> > Sent: June 27, 2006 4:29 PM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry
> >
> >
> >
> > Jerry,
> >
> > If you have a 6.40 system or above in your landscape then use Extended
> > Notifications not RSWUWFML2 - from Extended Notifications you could tailor
> > the notifications to be read from all affected systems.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm hoping to do some blogs some time on this topic but I want to finish the
> > OO series first.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jocelyn Dart
> > Senior Consultant
> > SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
> > Level 1/168 Walker St.
> > North Sydney
> > NSW, 2060
> > Australia
> > T +61 412 390 267
> > M + 61 412 390 267
> > E jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> > http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/>
> >
> > The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission is
> > confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the
> > person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, review,
> > retransmission, dissemination or other use of this electronic transmission
> > or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this electronic transmission in error, please immediately contact
> > the sender to arrange for the return of the original documents.
> >
> > Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and accordingly,
> > the sender does not accept liability for any such data corruption,
> > interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the consequences
> > thereof.
> >
> > Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
> > individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
> > is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of its
> > subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors, officers and
> > employees make no representation nor accept any liability for the accuracy
> > or completeness of the views or information contained herein. Please be
> > aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/ business proposal
> > herein is indicative only, is subject to change and shall not be construed
> > as an offer or as constituting a binding agreement on the part of SAP AG or
> > any of its subsidiaries to enter into any relationship, unless otherwise
> > expressly stated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
> > Mark Pyc
> > Sent: Sunday, 25 June 2006 5:47 PM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: Re: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry
> >
> > G'day Jerry,
> >
> > I can appreciate that what you're after is an UWL equivalent of RSWUWFML2.
> > i.e. like the UWL it would be central and only configured once rather than
> > in each backend system, but I don't think such functionality exists. I think
> > you just have to set up RSWUWFML2 in each system.
> >
> > Have fun,
> > Mark
> >
> > On 6/25/06, jerry.martinek <jerry.martinek at shawbiz.ca> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Is it possible to setup an UWL triggered email notification process if the
> > owner receives a workitem in their UWL? It's sort of the opposite
> > functionality of the UWL Alerts. The goal is to let the selected person know
> > that they have a waiting approval request in their UWL inbox.
> >
> >
> >
> > I've read through the documentation on the UWL but I couldn't find anything
> > on this subject.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060627/c008dcc8/attachment.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> > End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 19, Issue 70
> > ***************************************
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> La future messagerie instantan?e : Essayez gratuitement Windows Live Messenger Beta <http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=0eccd94b-eb48-497c-8e60-c6313f7ebb73>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060628/9e113856/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 19, Issue 72
> ***************************************
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list