Strange situation here-- WF Task normal execution errors - howtotrace?

[Dave Weston]

Is the dump for user WF-BATCH ? WF-BATCH should have the SAP_ALL and
SAP_NEW authorizations. Check in SU01. 

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Markkos
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:39 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Strange situation here-- WF Task normal execution errors -
howtotrace?


I check the ST22, and there's a dump, but it doesn't look like the
problem, it's a TABLE_INVALID_INDEX, but i really don't know, is just
one dump.. i've been having these problems since yesterday...

How can i check what you're telling me about the authorizations for the
user executing tasks ? 



On 7/11/06, Dave Weston <Dave.Weston at clockwork.ca> wrote: 

	Usual suspects are SAP authorizations for the user executing the
task, e.g.user WF-BATCH if its a background task. I guess check that
first. Any short dumps in ST22 ?
	 
	Dave
	 

________________________________

	From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]
On Behalf Of Markkos
	Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:01 PM
	To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
	Subject: Re: Strange situation here-- WF Task normal execution
errors - how totrace?
	
	
	
	error in the log:
	
	Work item 000002207129: Object CN5CLNT120BUS2081 55000013792006
method POSTINVOICE cannot be executed
	
	
	
	On 7/11/06, Markkos < markkos at gmail.com> wrote: 

		Hi guys, 
		
		Well, i'm having a really strange problem here. 
		
		The final task of my workflow is not getting executed
correctly. This task calls a Object Method (that calls a function
module). The strange thing, is that i have made execution tests of the
function module itself, the method, the task, and the workflow (using
the SWUS) and it WORKS. BUT in the normal WF execution is returning an
error. I don't know what's happening. 
		
		I have made several changes without having success.
		
		I've built another method, I've created new tasks, I've
generated a new version of the worfklow. 
		
		What can you say about this?, any way to trace what's
really happening? 
		
		i'll appreciate your valuable input.
		
		Thanks in advanced.
		
		Regards,
		



	_______________________________________________
	SAP-WUG mailing list
	SAP-WUG at mit.edu
	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
	
	
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060711/befbc959/attachment.htm