Transporting workflow / buffer question

Munday,Sherie J. MUNDAYSJ at airproducts.com
Wed Jan 25 10:26:42 EST 2006


Hello Margaret,
We have also had to manually refresh the buffer on numerous occasions.
I've just accepted it.
Regards,
Sherie Munday
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Hilsbos, Margaret A
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 10:03 AM
To: SAP-WUG (E-mail)
Subject: Transporting workflow / buffer question

Hi WUGer's,

I just noticed the strangest thing.  I don't seem to have a problem now,
but just thought I'd relate this little scenario, and see if anyone can
enlighten me as to why this happened.

We tested a workflow in our QA system (4.6c) and users decided they
wanted a minor change. No problem, I made the change in development and
transported it to QA yesterday. I had to leave early so the transport
actually happened yesterday after I left, and I went to check it and
test it this morning. 

So we had a "midnight" between the transport and when I looked at it,
and I figured any necessary buffer refreshes would have happened
automatically overnight.  Imagine my surprise when I looked at the
workflow, and the change was *not* reflected.  The return code on the
import was zero .... but the change was not in place. Huh? I started
thinking things like, do I have to create a new version in this
situation?

Luckily before I got too crazy I manually refreshed the buffers, and now
everything is fine.

My question is, why did I have to refresh the buffer manually? Does this
indicate something might be set up incorrectly in our system, or is this
just one more known quirk of SAP's workflow system?

Thanks for any enlightenment you care to share!


Margaret Hilsbos
Day & Zimmermann


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug




More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list