ESS workflow WS12300111

[Marc Rondia]

Jocelyn,

 

You’re right, Extended Notification is there in ERP2005 and is a far better
evolution than RSWUWFML2
 this is what happens when one reads a post
diagonally


Although I don’t see why the outburst: RSWUWFML2 has served well so far. You
make it sound like this is the report to avoid by all means. (Again, I agree
that in ERP2005, one should take advantage of the extended notifications.)

 

Regards,

Marc

 

9128-1964 Québec Inc.

Marc Rondia

4051 rue Emile-Vaniér, app.1

Montréal QC H1Y 3P7

 

Tel: +1 (514) 529 9117

Cel: +1 (514) 806 9430

  _____  

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Dart, Jocelyn
Sent: 30 août 2006 01:30
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: ESS workflow WS12300111

 

Marc, 

 

Sorry but no it absolutely should ****NOT***** be RSWUWFML2!!!!!!! 

 

ERP2005 is a 6.40 box - you should be using Extended Notifications i.e.
SWNCONFIG. 

 

Regards, 
Jocelyn Dart 
Senior Consultant 
SAP Australia Pty Ltd. 
Level 1/168 Walker St. 
North Sydney 
NSW, 2060 
Australia 
T   +61 412 390 267 
M   + 61 412 390 267 
E   jocelyn.dart at sap.com 
http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/>  

The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission is
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of this electronic transmission
or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this electronic transmission in error, please immediately contact
the sender to arrange for the return of the original documents. 

Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and accordingly,
the sender does not accept liability for any such data corruption,
interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the consequences
thereof.

Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of its
subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors, officers and
employees make no representation nor accept any liability for the accuracy
or completeness of the views or information contained herein. Please be
aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/ business proposal
herein is indicative only, is subject to change and shall not be construed
as an offer or as constituting a binding agreement on the part of SAP AG or
any of its subsidiaries to enter into any relationship, unless otherwise
expressly stated. 

 

 

  _____  

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Marc Rondia
Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 12:20 PM
To: 'SAP Workflow Users' Group'
Subject: RE: ESS workflow WS12300111

Hi,

I don’t know about the two last reports as I haven’t worked with ESS yet but
the first one, about e-mails, should be RSWUWFML2.

Marc

 

9128-1964 Québec Inc.

Marc Rondia

4051 rue Emile-Vaniér, app.1

Montréal QC H1Y 3P7

 

Tel: +1 (514) 529 9117

Cel: +1 (514) 806 9430

  _____  

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Nash John
Sent: 29 août 2006 14:08
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: ESS workflow WS12300111

 

Hi Friends,

 

I've a question on ESS. Infact three questions. Like I said I'm working on
ESS on mySAP ERP 2005.I managed to get a document from sdn on configuration
and workflow side of ESS. It was(is) very helpful. My question is, in the
document they have mentioned that to make WS12300111 workflow fully
functional i should do also following: 

 

1.Report for sending e-mails

2. 

Report for posting documents to Time Management database tables (infotypes
and the 

TEVEN table)

3.

Error report for the HR/time administrator, 

 

Can anyone teel me the names of these three reports? I checked and it is not
mentioned any where in this 180 page document.

Please help!!!.

Thanks,

-Nash

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060831/505d8b6a/attachment.htm