Performance example

[Mark Pyc]

Serge, how are check fms more effecient than start conditions since start
conditions are implemented as check fms??

On 4/5/06, Breslavets Sergey <sergey.breslavets at volvo.com> wrote:
>
>  Hi Richard,
>
> use the standard events and event check function module instead of the
> starting conditions (it's executed even before the event is started). It's
> more efficient then conditions, and easier to maintain then user exit.
>
> Serge
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]*On Behalf
> Of *Smart, Richard
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 05, 2006 10:52 AM
> *To:* sap-wug at mit.edu
> *Subject:* Performance example
>
>  Just looking for some guidance here on the following example:
>
> If a workflow is to be triggered for a certain sales organization when a
> sales order undergoes a credit block, which of these 2 routes is the best to
> take?
>
>
>
> 1)       Use the events BUS2032.CREATED or BUS2032.CHANGED and put a start
> condition in the workflow.
>
> 2)       Trigger a new event from a user exit within the sales order.
>
>
>
> Which of these approaches is best?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060406/a6f4c412/attachment.htm