Portal - UWL vs. SAP Business Workplace
Athur Krishna
athur.krishna at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 16:27:47 EDT 2005
Hi All,
Thanks to Greg,Jocelyn,Peter and others for sharing their knowledge.
just one more clarification,
assuming that I have configured both SRM and R/3 inbox in UWL (basically
registering the system).
SRM needs "Substitution" option and R/3 does not need.
and all my inbox in UWL will be flooded with both SRM and R/3 approvals ,
considering that "Substitution" is available in EP 6.0 stack 12, so how do I
enable / disable "Substitution" specifically for R/3 and SRM approval
workitems.
Thanks,
-Krishna
On 9/2/05, Collins Obiosa-Maife <comaife at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hello Jocelyn,
> Thanks for this contribution. However, I'd like to know if there's a
> documentation that describes how to display the SRM Inbox in the UWL? I need
> this solution to tie the work items in my SRM Inbox to the UWL.
> Thanks in advance.
> Collins
>
> *"Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>* wrote:
>
> Folks,
> Substitution IS standard in the UWL as of EP 6.0 support stack 12.
> Forwarding, reserve/replace and the other items you specifically
> mentioned Sherman are also already included in the UWL. As always make sure
> you are on the highest support stack to get the maximum bug/performance
> improvements and latest functionality.
> You should also be aware that SAP considers the UWL as the main workflow
> inbox from a future-direction perspective.
> While it still has a few rough edges compared to the more mature SBWP
> these are gradually being smoothed out. Similarly the documentation on
> configuration options is improving.
> As Peter has pointed out the UWL has some advantages when dealing with
> web-based services.
> It is also the only inbox which allows you to easily combine all work
> items from all of your SAP systems.
> Another consideration is that the UWL has already become not just the
> workflow inbox but the Alert Management inbox as well, so it has dual
> functionality.
> You also get Collaboration Tasks (ad-hoc workflow ) in the UWL which are
> not available in SBWP.
> Regards,
> *Jocelyn Dart*
> Senior Consultant
> *SAP Australia Pty Ltd.*
> Level 1/168 Walker St.
> North Sydney
> NSW, 2060
> Australia
> T +61 412 390 267
> M + 61 412 390 267
> E jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> http://www.sap.com
>
> The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
> is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the
> person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, review,
> retransmission, dissemination or other use of this electronic transmission
> or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this electronic transmission in error, please immediately contact
> the sender to arrange for the return of the original documents.
>
> Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and accordingly,
> the sender does not accept liability for any such data corruption,
> interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the consequences
> thereof.
>
> Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
> is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of its
> subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors, officers and
> employees make no representation nor accept any liability for the accuracy
> or completeness of the views or information contained herein. Please be
> aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/ business proposal
> herein is indicative only, is subject to change and shall not be construed
> as an offer or as constituting a binding agreement on the part of SAP AG or
> any of its subsidiaries to enter into any relationship, unless otherwise
> expressly stated.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Peter Carroll
> *Sent:* Friday, 02 September 2005 10:05 AM
> *To:* 'SAP Workflow Users' Group'
> *Subject:* RE: Portal - UWL vs. SAP Business Workplace
>
> We also coded the substitution function for use inthe portal, basically a
> copy of the standard SBWP code.
> But when comparing the UWL and the SBWP my question is why would anyone
> use something that is a half baked copy of the real thing ?
> The UWL is flaky and hard to configure - maybe it is just me but I still
> cannot get the same task to come up under more than one filter on the open
> tasks tab etc
> Other points to consider
> *The UWL is slower than the SBWP.
> *Depending on the nature of the task, business HTML in separate window or
> some java ones, the task just executed is still in the open tasks list after
> it has been just processed - users hate this as they are unsure if item has
> been executed or not.
> *Under some circumstances if the user double clicks on the item a lock
> error is received, a note describes this but offers no solution.
> *The documentation to use and configure the UWL is totally inadaquate and
> unless one of the examples in it exactly matches your needs you will
> struggle
> *The loss of chained execution(advance with dialogue) is hard to take and
> makes simple things complex.
> Be careful if you use the UWL, but in my opinion you are better off on
> just one platform as you will be hard pressed to satisfy users of both with
> the one WF. In particular screens that use business HTML, are generated from
> the container of the WF or are written in Java present major problems when
> used in the SBWP.
> Peter Carroll
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Athur Krishna
> *Sent:* Friday, 2 September 2005 0:19
> *To:* SAP Workflow Users' Group
> *Subject:* Re: Portal - UWL vs. SAP Business Workplace
>
> Hi Greg,
> One small question, EBP Approvals have the "Substitution" option, How
> did you achive that in UWL since UWL by default does not come with
> "Substitute" option.
> Thanks,
> -Krishna
>
> On 9/1/05, Gregory Utley <Gregory.Utley at citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > We just converted from the SAP Office inbox to the UWL with the
> > implementation of the SAP Portal. The big plus for users here is one stop
> > shopping, i.e., all SAP Office inboxes (R/3, EBP, ESS) are now available
> > in one place. Before, users had to enter via SBWP to approve separately in
> > each system. The biggest negative with the UWL is the loss of the "advance
> > with dialog" feature. We've had to write custom code to compensate for this.
> > I think this is a major loss, although I haven't seen any other complaints
> > on WUG on the topic.
> >
> > *Greg Utley*
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *On
> > Behalf Of *Sherman Wright
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:52 PM
> > *To:* UserGroup, Workflow
> > *Subject:* Portal - UWL vs. SAP Business Workplace
> >
> > Hi �
> >
> > We are using Portal 6.0, and because of unfamiliarity, etc., etc., we
> > had replaced the Universal Work List (UWL) with the SAP Business Workplace
> > (transaction SBWP) using Windows HTML GUI. We have a handful of workflow
> > approval tasks (PR approvals, Fixed Asset retirement approvals, Absence
> > Request approvals, etc.) that we route to people in their Workflow Inboxes,
> > which should be available with either "tool".
> >
> > We are in the process of moving from SAP R/3 4.6B to MySAP ERP (ECC 5.0).
> > In light of this, I have been asked to provide pros and cons regarding
> > replacing the Business Workplace with the UWL, since the UWL is the default
> > tool in Portal. Do any of you have any strong arguments either for or
> > against the use of UWL as opposed to the Business Workplace? Some of our
> > users really like the ability to do their automatic forwarding, substitution
> > maintenance, outbox maintenance, etc., from Portal. Most of these things
> > especially don't seem to be available in the UWL.
> >
> > Any information would be appreciated�
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sherman
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> ------------------------------
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new *Yahoo!
> Security Centre*<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/security_centre/*http://uk.security.yahoo.com/>
> .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050902/e2354dd0/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list