Substitution Question/Problem

[jerry martinek]

Hi Serge,

I forgot to mention that I've already tried that. 

The relationship is there but the evaluation path SAP_SUBO is not recognizing it. When I run RS_STRUC_GET using SAP_SUBF if returns the position of the person who is assigned as the substitute.

Would you willing to look at your SAP_SUBO evaluation path definition and let me know what is inside it?

Thanks,
Jerry
  
----- Original Message -----
From: jerry martinek <jerry.martinek at shawbiz.ca>
Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:30 am
Subject: Substitution Question/Problem

> Hi Jerry,
> 
> A210 relationship should be use between position objects ‘S’. I am 
> not sure that you could change this behaviour.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Serge
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> 
> De : sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] De la part 
> de jerry.martinek
> Envoyé : 23 novembre 2005 02:16
> À : sap-wug at mit.edu
> Objet : Substition Question/Problem
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> I’ve run into a scenario that I don’t know how to solve. I’ve 
> defined a substitution (‘A 210’) relationship for a position using 
> a US object type. I selected the ‘Substitution Active’ when I 
> saved the relationship and I thought that I was done as everything 
> seemed fine from PO13.
> 
> 
> 
> The problem is that RS_SUBSTITUTES_GET doesn’t seem to recognize 
> the fact that there is an active substitution relationship in 
> effect. The function module uses evaluation path SAP_SUBO that 
> only has one entry, * A210 * and it’s not recognizing the 
> substitution relationship. If I run RH_STRUCT_GET directly with 
> evaluation path SAP_SUBF it returns the substitute information.
> 
> 
> 
> Should SAP_SUBO have more than the single entry and if yes, what 
> should they be? Any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> 
> 
> This is a new workflow site/install so I have nothing to compare 
> against. The SAP version is 4.6C and I believe that they are up to 
> support pack 48.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jerry 
> 
>