2 year wait vs Batch Report

[Peter Roehlen]

Hi Ram,
 
Make sure you look me up when you write your book.  I'm sure that I've got more than a couple of contributions I can make from my own painful experiences.  For example, have you ever brought a companies mail system to a screaming halt by moving a new general task into PRD and forgetting to set the 'terminate if role resolution has no result' on the standard role?  (Trust me, I'm a workflow expert... : )
 
Anyway, it's all good fun.
 
Cheers - Peter.  


Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:17:50 +0530
From: "Tiwari, Rammanohar" <rammanohar.tiwari at logicacmg.com>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Subject: RE: 2 year wait vs Batch Report

Hi Peter,
 
I knew that 0.1 second is too much for this :) but I used it just for comparison purpose ( And to make you check your system and come up with some real time stats ).
 
But this is not the major mistake I made actually.
I didn't consider that even SAP's system programs need to do some checking to start the scheduled jobs after 2 year ( I think almost every second along with all other scheduled jobs )
 
But then all is not lost . I will use this example when I'll write a book called "SAP for Stupid" :-). I've gathered a lot of these , mostly my own contributions ...
 
Cheers,
Ram



---------------------------------
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050506/e3e17dad/attachment.htm