2 year wait vs Batch Report

[Alon Raskin]

Hi Thomas,
 
I appreciate your input but I was wondering WHY you have this preference? Is it performance related? Or simply past experience?
 
Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> 
p: +61 3 9625 2189 (Head Office)
f:  +61 3 8610 1239 
c:  +1 207 756 0370
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of Thomas Lorenz
Sent: Thu 5/5/2005 09:46
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: AW: 2 year wait vs Batch Report


Hi Alon,
 
i would prefer an additional ABAP Report to clear the field, which runs as Batch once a day. In my opinion it makes little sense to keep these Workflows for two years in "running" mode.
 
Greetings,
 
Thomas Lorenz


mobil + 49 170 3558989
mail tlorenz at web-ls.de
fon + 49 228 3867985
fax + 49 228 3868844

 

	-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
	Von: Alon Raskin [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]Im Auftrag von Alon Raskin
	Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2005 14:53
	An: SAP Workflow Users' Group
	Betreff: RE: 2 year wait vs Batch Report
	
	
	Hi Ram,
	 
	Thanks for the input. My problem with this approach is that I now have a batch job scheduled for each instance of the workflow (around 400 or so)... I guess it not a big deal but I am not sure I am seeing what the advantages of using this over the deadline monitoring report...
	 
	
	
	Alon Raskin
	e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> 
	p: +61 3 9625 2189 (Head Office)
	f:  +61 3 8610 1239 
	c:  +1 207 756 0370
	w: http://www.3i-consulting.com

________________________________

	From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of Tiwari, Rammanohar
	Sent: Thu 5/5/2005 08:49
	To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
	Subject: RE: 2 year wait vs Batch Report
	
	
	I think there might be another option ( Not sure though ) :
	 
	Just after that step in your workflow put another step which will schedule a Batch Job (FM BP_JOB_CREATE)  with release date = sy-datum + 2 years.
	I am not sure but system restart should not affect it. 
	 
	The Batch job will then trigger an event ( after two years )  to re-start the terminated workflow.
	 
	Thanks,
	Ram
	 

		-----Original Message-----
		From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]On Behalf Of Alon Raskin
		Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:26 PM
		To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
		Subject: 2 year wait vs Batch Report
		
		
		Hi Everyone,
		 
		I would love to hear peoples opinions on this issue.
		 
		We have a situation where a workflow has to do update a field and then wait for 2 years before clearing that field. There are two possibilities to this issue.
		 
		1. Put in a 2 year wait step
		2. Terminate the workflow and run a nightly batch job which would query some table and determine if 2 years have passed and then reset the field accordingly.
		 
		Currently I am leaning towards option 1 as I really don't see a difference in option 1 and option 2. Ultimately they are all just batch jobs which check dates and then do some processing. The volumes here are very low.
		 
		Your thoughts?
		 
		
		
		Alon Raskin
		e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> 
		
		w: http://www.3i-consulting.com


	This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
	

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 11028 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050505/1c0e7be3/attachment.bin