Inbox Performance question (SBWP)

[Alon Raskin]

Perhaps the work items that are being routed to one of your users are
resulting in inefficient SQL (or simply larger Selects) then the other
users.
 
For example if User A only deals with certain types of customers then the
calculation of the dynamic columns may take longer (and hence the longer
load times)
 
Its just a theory....
 
Alon Raskin
e:  <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> araskin at 3i-consulting.com
w:  <http://www.3i-consulting.com/> http://www.3i-consulting.com
 

  _____  

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
koenraad.janssens at sidmar.arcelor.com
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:08 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Cc: sap-wug at mit.edu; sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
Subject: RE: Inbox Performance question (SBWP)



Yes, as stated (and they do put the inbox under stress).. however both have
the same dynamic columns. 

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Salutations,
Best regards,
Mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Atentos saludos, 


 	Koenraad Janssens
Sidmar N.V. - ISM
Leverage Team - Programmer 
Tel: +32 9 347 35 76
email:  <mailto:koenraad.Janssens at sidmar.arcelor.com>
koenraad.janssens at sidmar.arcelor.com 




	araskin at 3i-consulting.com 
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu 


24/06/2005 11:53 
Please respond to sap-wug 


        
        To:        sap-wug at mit.edu 
        cc:         
        Subject:        RE: Inbox Performance question (SBWP)



Are you using dynamic columns the inbox? 
  
Alon Raskin 
e:  <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> araskin at 3i-consulting.com 
p: +61 3 9625 2189 (Head Office) 
f:  +61 3 8610 1239 
c:  +1 207 756 0370 
w:  <http://www.3i-consulting.com/> http://www.3i-consulting.com 
  


  _____  

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
koenraad.janssens at sidmar.arcelor.com
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 5:47 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: Inbox Performance question (SBWP)


Hello All 

We have two users whom have totally different access times to their inboxes.
The weird part is that they have about the same number of tasks and the same
filter in place.  The first user needs 4 seconds to enter his inbox, the
other needs 18 seconds.  (mind you we are working with dynamic columns) 

What other parameters could have an influence on this?  We are really
puzzled on this difference.... 

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Salutations,
Best regards,
Mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Atentos saludos, 


 	Koenraad Janssens
Sidmar N.V. - ISM
Leverage Team - Programmer 
Tel: +32 9 347 35 76
email:  <mailto:koenraad.Janssens at sidmar.arcelor.com>
koenraad.janssens at sidmar.arcelor.com 




****************************************************************************
*******
This message should only be read by those persons to whom it is 
addressed, and may contain confidential information, the disclosure 
of which is prohibited. This message is not intended to create rights 
or obligations without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. 
If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately 
****************************************************************************
*******_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050624/b768bd4c/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2268 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050624/b768bd4c/attachment.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2268 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050624/b768bd4c/attachment-0001.gif