program for the activation of a wf - answer

[Michael Pokraka]

Ahem, I sheepishly stand corrected. I was kindly reminded to look on OSS. Lo
and behold, both Pat's and my problems are in the following:

571302 - Collective note relating to transports in workflow 

Cheers
Mike

--- Michael Pokraka <workflow at quirky.me.uk> wrote:

> Hehe, we're just battling the same beast here on a 4.7 system: We transported
> a
> WF with 9 versions from DEV to QA, and getting an error. 
> "Workflow definition 'WS9......' not in version '0009'". Obviously, because
> in
> a new system it gets a version 0000.
> We regenerated a new version in DEV and retransported it... same message, but
> with "...not in version '0010'". 
> 
> After some days of to and fro and retransporting and messing about we've
> concluded this has all been a waste of time, opened the system, activated the
> 'real' version manually and hey presto it all works. Grrrr... timewastes for
> no
> real reason is one of the minor inconveniences we do occasionally have to put
> up with, but it does keep us in a job. 
> 
> Cheers
> Mike
> 
> --- Nolin.Patrice at hydro.qc.ca wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > We have transported 10 wf in a QA environment. All the pieces are there,
> but
> > some wf don't work. Is there a programme usable by SE38 to activate (like
> > open the wf in SWDD and click the activate button) that we could use to
> > activate WF with having to open the configuration in the QA envir ?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Pat Nolin
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
>