Object requested is currently locked by user WF-BATCH-questions 4.6c

Fri Aug 5 11:05:36 EDT 2005

Nope! No messages sent. 

I have auto forward from WF-BATCH to me and am the assigned WF admin. 
I see all the other error messages but nothing about these stuck tasks
issue. 
I will be monitoring. If I get a stuck inprocess issue again I will
have to dig a tad deeper. 

Bugs me that no messages were sent for this stuck inprocess issue. 
Anyone know of any OSS notes?

Rick Sample

>>> araskin at 3i-consulting.com 8/5/2005 9:36 >>>
Hi Mike,

You are right. it should. But I was on a project in the UK which was
using 4.6C and I recall many instances where that simply did not
happen.
I never did get to the bottom of it....

Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com < mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com > 
p: +61 3 9625 2189 (Head Office)
f: +61 3 8610 1239 
c: +1 207 756 0370
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com 

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of Mike Pokraka
Sent: Fri 8/5/2005 10:36
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: RE: Object requested is currently locked by user
WF-BATCH-questions 4.6c

Hi Rick,
It should. Any BG step in status READY for more than 10 min or STARTED
for
more than 20 min gets a message "Work Item 1234 is in status STARTED.
Please initiate corrective action.. blah blah waffle.." sent to the WF
admin. (From memory, but something similar).
Cheers
Mike

Rick Sample wrote:
> No errors are thrown anywhere that I can see.
> So I don't see how RSWWERRE can pick them up.
> And yes, it is running.
>
> I will need to chat with the folks that wrote the methods in
question
> in ZBUS7051.
> Something should be passed back for status.
>
> Rick
>
>
>>>> wug.replies at workflowconnections.com 8/5/2005 8:38 >>>
> The error monitoring job should pick those up after an hour or so
and
> mail
> the WF admin, I've found it fairly reliable.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> Rick Sample wrote:
>> SWI1 Type B and ...
>> Sounds like a plan. I am adding it to my Daily To-Do.
>>
>> Thanks for the tip
>>
>>
>>
>> Rick Sample
>> SAP Workflow Analyst/Developer
>> Graybar, Inc.
>> 11885 Lackland Rd.
>> 63146-4208
>> 314.573.5822
>> Rick.Sample at GBE.com 
>>
>>>>> KJETILK at statoil.com 8/5/2005 0:40:15 >>>
>>
>> We don't have a latest end deadline on that workflow, so I can't
> help
>> you with that one.
>> However, as a part of the daily monitoring routine, you can check
in
>> SWI1 for work items of type B in status STARTED.
>> --
>> Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil KTJ IT BKS
>>
>>
>> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Rick Sample
>> Sent: 4. august 2005 17:10
>> To: sap-wug at mit.edu 
>> Subject: RE: RE: Object requested is currently locked by user
> WF-BATCH
>> - questions 4.6c
>>
>>
>>
>> Requested Start was met but the task could not complete
>> due to a lock and nothing for Latest End. That makes sense.
>>
>> What have you found works for Latest End deadline on your HR wfs?
>> A minutes, hours, day(s), ...?
>>
>> It is an intermittent issue. I have only seen it in dev so we will
> note
>> this and
>> make changes if it is a problem in production.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>>>> KJETILK at statoil.com 8/4/2005 9:49 >>>
>>
>> The execution has started, so you will not get any deadline action
>> unless you also define a latest end deadline.
>>
>> One of the workflows we have problems with is also having problems
> with
>> locked HR objects.
>>
>> I don't know which tables holds the deadline information, but it
>> shouldn't be too difficult to find. The name(s) probably start with
>> SWW.
>> --
>> Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil KTJ IT BKS
>>
>>
>> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Rick Sample
>> Sent: 4. august 2005 14:19
>> To: sap-wug at mit.edu 
>> Subject: RE: Object requested is currently locked by user WF-BATCH
-
>> questions 4.6c
>>
>>
>>
>> Deadline is on the Requested Start.
>> The task is calling a method in obj BUS7051 (Notification obj).
>> Right now I am assuming it was caused by a locked HR object.
>> No dumps and nothing I can see that is causing the issue.
>>
>> I have some tasks still sitting "inProcess" status.
>> I know we have no current locks on the objects in questions.
>> I can only assume the entries were removed from the table
>> that holds this information on deadline monitoring.
>>
>> Any idea what table holds this information for deadline monitoring?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>>>> KJETILK at statoil.com 8/4/2005 0:39 >>>
>>
>> Is your deadline on latest end? Not that I really think it matters
>> much... we have similar problems. One possible problem is
> insufficient
>> error checking in the code, i.e. a short dump occurs. Another
>> possibility is deadlock problems which are not detected in the
code,
> so
>> it tries but can't perform updates. I can't recall if that causes
> short
>> dumps in our system.
>> --
>> Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil KTJ IT BKS
>>
>>
>> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Rick Sample
>> Sent: 3. august 2005 16:57
>> To: sap-wug at mit.edu 
>> Subject: Object requested is currently locked by user WF-BATCH -
>> questions 4.6c
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a Task with a Deadline timer that gets stuck inprocess
>> sometimes.
>> I looked at SM58 and ST22 and don't see any issues.
>> I manually set these to Ready and the WF continued executing.
>>
>> I have Deadline monitoring running every 3 minutes (in Dev client).
>> Not sure why these Tasks were stuck or why they did not get picked
>> up eventually by RSWWDHEX.
>>
>> Any help is appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and
is
>> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use,
dissemination
> of
>> the
>> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are
not
>> the
>> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
and
>> delete
>> this message.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and
is
>> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use,
dissemination
> of
>> the
>> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are
not
>> the
>> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
and
>> delete
>> this message.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and
is
>> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use,
dissemination
> of
>> the
>> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are
not
>> the
>> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
and
>> delete
>> this message.
>> Thank you.
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu 
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 
>>
>
>
> Mike Pokraka
> Senior Consultant
> Workflow Connections Ltd.
> Mobile: +44 (0)7786 910 855
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu 
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu 
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 
>

Mike Pokraka
Senior Consultant
Workflow Connections Ltd.
Mobile: +44 (0)7786 910 855
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu 
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050805/e65e0870/attachment.htm