SRM n step item level WF

[Dart, Jocelyn]

Glad you have it sorted Laszlo. 
Jocelyn 

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of lmillich at yahoo.com
Sent: Monday,11 April 2005 3:37 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SRM n step item level WF

Jocelyn , 

Sorry for the late reply.
I appreciate your help to me and to the group. 
In the meantime the problem is solved. An event
linkage activation was missing,the start condition
alone was not enough, but I also changed the BADI
code. Both problem has gone. 

Thanks, 

Laszlo  




--- "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com> wrote:
> Hi Laszlo, 
> In your BADI, you specify which items are linked to
> which approvers.
> Sounds like you still haven't nutted out the BADI
> code correctly.  
> 
> Re the second problem - check for any OSS notes.  If
> you can't find any
> report it in.
> Jocelyn 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of lmillich at YAHOO.COM
> Sent: Wednesday,23 March 2005 8:27 AM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: SRM n step item level WF
> 
> Hi Folks, 
> 
> In SRM 4.0 the 'n step item level' WF does not
> function as it is expected. 
> I use WS14500015, I have implemented the BADI
> BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI based on a sample SAP code. 
> In the second step/level  on item level different
> approvers should be determined based on cost center.
> 
> I programmed this in the BADI. 
> When there are different cost centers in the items, 
> in the preview I can see that the items should be
> approved by different persons.This is good. 
> But during approval in the inbox all the items are
> shown and can be accepted by all the approvers, the
> not relevant items are not greyed out. 
> I tried to fill the 'hide_items_not_responsible'
> parameter, 
> but this did not help either.  
> 
> The other problem: 
> The workflow does not stop based on the BADI
> programming (I use currenlty 3 steps for testing
> purposes).
> I set the 'No_further_approval_needed' BADI
> parameter,
> but this is not passed to the corresponding WF
> container, and 
> as I see even if it  set, the workflow does not use
> it. So the WF does not stop after the 3.step, 
> but tries to find new agents/approvers untill it
> reaches the WI limit. 
> 
> I appreciate any idea, which could help. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Laszlo M. 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug