AW: Workflow-overview in "services for object"

[Werner Koessl]

Hi Mike,
 
thanks for your answer.
I made the workflow a general task and my container element (that refers =
to object type ECM) is flagged as import and export.
But i do not get the workflow in the workflow-overview in CC03.
I have another little workflow (Nr. 2) that has the same element (which =
also refers to ECM). This workflow is shown in the list.
I notized that i can also test it with the button "Start Workflow" in =
the menu "Services for object".
But i only see workflow Nr. 2.
The general task is needed, because when i remove the general task from =
workflow Nr. 2 it is not shown in the list anymore.
 
Probably there is a problem because the element that refers to ECM is =
filled in a sub-workflow.
But i return the element to the main workflow and i also add the object =
to _adhoc_objects.
 
Regards,
Werner.
 
 
 
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]Im Auftrag von
Michael Pokraka
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. September 2004 11:21
An: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Betreff: Re: Workflow-overview in "services for object"
 
 
Hi Werner,
One or both of the following applies, I can't remember which:
 
- It needs to be accessible to all users, make the WS a general task, or
- Your container element needs to be flagged as import or export... I =
think
this is the culprit,
 
Try both and see,
Cheers
Mike
 
Werner Koessl wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> in transactions MM03, VA33, CC03 i can use the "services for object".
> What do i have to do that a workflow is listed in the =
"workflow-overview"?
> I thought when a running workflow that has a container element which =
refers
> to an object it is listed in the workflow-overview.
> E.g. workflow Nr. 1 has a container element that refers to object type
> BUS1001006 (Material), so it is listed in the workflow-overview of =
MM03
>  and workflow Nr. 2 has a container element that refers to object type =
ECM
> (Change Master), so it is listed in the workflow-overview of CC03.
>
> Is this right or what else is important for the workflow-overview?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Werner.
>
>