AC - Standard role problem

David Weston weston at clockwork.ca
Thu Oct 28 11:55:48 EDT 2004


Zsolt what agents have you defined as possible agents for the task
TS20000159 ? Is it a general task or have you defined agents to it ?
 
Dave
=20
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of =
M=E1rton
Zsolt
Sent: 28 October 2004 09:44
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: AC - Standard role problem
 
 
Hi Dave!
Yes, I have.
But, if I choose position for agent, then the workflow runs. I've tested =
my
role with S_AHR_61016513 (Reporting structure with Persons) and the test =
was
successful: the role saw the positions and the users. I think, the
relationships between the role and the agents are correct.
 
Zsolt=20
 
=20
 
-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of =
David
Weston
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:48 PM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: AC - Standard role problem
 
Zsolt, have you assigned your agents in the transaction OMGQ release
strategy workflow config ? Do you have users assigned to your positions =
?
 
Dave
 
=20
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of =
M=E1rton
Zsolt
Sent: 28 October 2004 06:51
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: AC - Standard role problem
 
 
Hi All!
 
=20
 
I'm using the TS20000159 for owerall release of requisition for purchase
requisition release. The Agent is 20000026  (standard MM_req_rel_c)  and =
in
the agents assigment I'm using positions. I've made the relationship for =
201
(Assigned role) in the following way:
 
AC       Standard role    A          201       Assigned role    S
 
S          Position            B          201       Role incorporates
AC,=20
 
and a've also made the links in the PP01 between the role and the =
position,
but my workflow log is still saying, that he could not establish agents =
for
my step.
 
=20
 
What could be wrong in my workflow?
 
Does anybody seen this kind of problem before?
 
Thanks
 
Zsolt
 


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list