Funny Workflow Versions

Thu Oct 14 12:47:19 EDT 2004

Hi Alon/Heinz,

I have experienced the same thing in a 4.6c implementation.  And I =
believe Heinz's explanation is absolutely accurate.

One thing I have done on subsequent implementations is to NOT use =
workflow versioning.  In my experience, it is not worth the confusion it =
causes when you start interacting with the transport system and the =
actual version that becomes active in your target system.

If you cannot get away from using it, in general, the latest version in =
your source system corresponds to the latest version in your target =
system even if the actual version numbers are different across =
instances.

With regards,
Partha Chatterjee

-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of =
Schmidinger, Heinz (Unaxis IT BZ)
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:27 PM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: AW: Funny Workflow Versions

Hi Alon,

the reason could be:

You are developing /desinging a WF-Def. in System A/Clt. 1. You are =
testing
your definition in Sys A /Clt. 2.
If you change the Definition and test it again, you get a new
runtime-version, if a Def is still active ...

So you can create new Defs-Versions in Sys A/clt. 1, in Clt.2 the
runtime-versions will be increased and so on.

Than you transport your defiitions to System B. The last active Version =
will
be transported (e.g. Version 6.) The first execution of the =
WF-Definition
will create rtv 1.

So you change your WF again in Sys A whith creation of new Versions =
twice,
you will have Version 8. IF this Version is transported to Sys B and
executed, it will be rtv 2.

Confusing ? me too.

regards an a nice day.

Heinz

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]Im Auftrag von
Alon Raskin
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2004 05:36
An: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Betreff: Re: Funny Workflow Versions

Hi Richard,

Thanks for this. Its really quite scary for us as it doesn't give us any
confidence that when we rebuild a system (and we do it quite frequently =
in
our testing clients), the workflow will be 'ready to go'. We have quite =
a
few workflows and even more sub-workflows and they all seem to be =
displaying
different versions.

Would you say that this is a bug (having 8 versions and having version 2 =
the
active one) ?

Regards,

Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com

-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Marut
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 4:18 AM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Funny Workflow Versions

Lon,

I had this happen one time back in 3.1H. I verified that the active =
version
was the actual the one right one and then I generated a new version. All =
was
okay after that.

Richard...

-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of =
Alon
Raskin
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:46 AM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Funny Workflow Versions

In our testing environments we have some strange going-ons.... Was =
hoping
someone could shed some light on this.

When I display a workflow, I can see that it has 8 versions yet version =
2 is
the active one. How can that be? I thought SAP creates a new version =
when
there is a current instance of the currnet active version but how can it =
be
that there are 8 versions and version 2 is the active one.

Any thoughts/suggestions are welcome

Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com>
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential =
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is =
protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should =
delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this =
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly =
prohibited.