SAP_WAPI_COUNT_WORKITEMS result.
Kjetil Kilhavn
kjetilk at statoil.com
Tue May 11 02:26:30 EDT 2004
It can't be just that (I think) - because we don't use deadline
notifications and have seen the same thing. If I recall correctly our best
guess was that the function returns the sum of workitems with you as a
specified agent and with no specified agent (e.g. available to all), even
if those without agents were also having no possible agents (e.g. not
visible to anyone).
E.g. in our quality system I have 2 quality notifications in my inbox.
There are four entries in SWWUSERWI on my user ID. The two which are not in
my inbox are work items which I have forwarded (in 2002...).
There are 27 entries with no user ID in SWWUSERWI.
The function returns ... to my surprise ... 2!
The two entries on my user which are not appearing in my inbox and all the
entries with no user ID have the indicator NO_SEL set (no relevance for
selection). That is probably why they are not included.
I tried replacing one of the workitems without user ID. The NO_SEL
indicator was cleared. The function then returns 3, but there are also 3
work items visible in my inbox now.
Data are too good in our test system. Now in the development system... the
function returns 40 and my inbox shows 31 (while SWI5 shows 35...). The
function matches the number of entries in SWWUSERWI with either my user or
no user and with NO_SEL = space.
The 5 entries not displayed in SWI5 are all general tasks. I don't know the
significance of it, but they all have agents and are waiting for completion
either by user confirmation or by an event.
Don't know if this makes you any wiser, but it could at least give you some
ideas about where to look. At least I got a little bit wiser, by
discovering the significance of the NO_SEL flag.
--
Kjetil Kilhavn
"Jeffrey A.
Rappaport" To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
<Jeff at Business-Workf cc: (bcc: Kjetil Kilhavn)
low.com> Subject: Re: SAP_WAPI_COUNT_WORKITEMS result.
Sent by: SAP
Workflow
<Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM
A.MIT.EDU>
10.05.2004 18:20
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow Users'
Group"
Bijay,
Are you using Deadline Monitoring in the WF's? If so I believe the
big difference in SWWUSERWI is it includes all the DM Message Items
that go to the User. Tranx: SBWP & SWI5 should match up. And the FM's
RH_WI_PER_USER_COUNT & SAP_WAPI_COUNT_WORKITEMS should match up.
Jeffrey A. Rappaport
Business Workflow, LLC
Voice:(732)355-0123
Fax: (509)757-4144
Email:Jeff at Business-Workflow.com
Web: www.Business-Workflow.com
Quoting Bijay Shrestha <Bijay.Shrestha at genmills.com>:
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I have my program in Prod. Where I did querry against Swwwihead
> table.
> I'm getting the correct number if user has reserved. Logically it's
> working fine. Only the issue we have is end users are complaining
> about
> performance because it takes little longer. That's why I thought if
> I
> could use this FM instead.
>
> The number 210 matches with the records in table SWWUSERWI but it
> seems
> like those records doesn't match with the WI in the inbox. I just
> deleted few WI from my Inbox to reduce the number, then checked the
> table SWWUSERWI. In the table number doesn't change, it's still
> 210.
>
> Therefore seems like I can't use this FM.
>
> Thanks for your help again.
>
> Bijay Shrestha
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf
> Of
> Kjetil Kilhavn
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 4:14 AM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: SAP_WAPI_COUNT_WORKITEMS result.
>
>
> Look at table SWWUSERWI and see if the number of workitems there on
> either your user or no user matches the 210.
> --
> Kjetil Kilhavn
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Miller, Jerry"
> <Jerry.Miller at NOVELL To:
> SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> US.com> cc: (bcc:
> Kjetil
> Kilhavn)
> Sent by: SAP Subject: Re:
> SAP_WAPI_COUNT_WORKITEMS result.
> Workflow
> <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM
> A.MIT.EDU>
>
>
> 08.05.2004 00:09
> Please respond to
> "SAP Workflow Users'
> Group"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bijay,
>
> You can create a simple Query to get this data using tables
> SWWWIHEAD and SWWORGTASK.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bijay Shrestha [mailto:Bijay.Shrestha at genmills.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 2:57 PM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: SAP_WAPI_COUNT_WORKITEMS result.
>
>
> I did go through the archive and found lots of discussion about
> this
> function module sap_wapi_count_workitems. We're in 4.6c version. In
> my
> inbox there are 137 workitems but this FM tells me that I have 210
> items. It doesn't make sense to me.
>
> Then I went further one step and run another FM
> RH_WI_PER_USER_COUNT
> which gives me same result which groups by Task#. Have somebody
> answer
> on this what are all this numbers. I need to know the number of
> workitems in somebody's inbox in my program.
>
>
> Bijay Shrestha
> Ph: (763) 764-2201
> Email: Bijay.Shrestha at genmills.com
> "WebFlow gets the right information to the right people at the
> right
> time!"
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and
> is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use,
> dissemination of
> the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you
> are not
> the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail and
> delete this message. Thank you.
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list