Terminating workflow by events in Business object

[Swami Bala]

Thanks Mike for the suggestions,
 
 
Swami Bala
 
 
 
 
 
>From: Michael Pokraka <workflow at quirky.me.uk>
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: Terminating workflow by events in Business object
>Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:35:03 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mc3-f31.hotmail.com ([64.4.50.167]) by mc3-s9.hotmail.com
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:37:53 -0700
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by
>mc3-f31.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 27 Jul 2004
>08:37:12 -0700
>Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
><18.00E29FA3 at cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:37:08 -0400
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>1.8e)          with spool id 2278 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Tue, 27 Jul
>2004          11:35:57 -0400
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
>      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 1423; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0400
>Received: from saturn.quirky.me.uk [81.2.95.188] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM
>SMTP          Level 430) via TCP with ESMTP ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:33:58 EDT
>Received: by saturn.quirky.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8B010B53;
>Tue, 27          Jul 2004 16:35:03 +0100 (BST)
>Received: from 193.130.87.58 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mike) by
>     garage.shacknet.nu with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:35:03 +0100 (BST)
>X-Message-Info: HQbIehuYceSMdQiCEsJZ1ULL7nY6xkhyHZdPWhHoNXg=
>X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by saturn.quirky.me.uk
>References: <BAY2-DAV14ywCP6K8CA00021c28 at hotmail.com>
>User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1
>Approved-By:  Michael Pokraka <workflow at QUIRKY.ME.UK>
>Message-ID:  <54963.193.130.87.58.1090942503.squirrel at garage.shacknet.nu>
>In-Reply-To:  <BAY2-DAV14ywCP6K8CA00021c28 at hotmail.com>
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2004 15:37:12.0494 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[960BA4E0:01C473EF]
>
>Hi,
>Do you need to distinguish where the event came from? If not, you could
>stop
>the workflow after the post step and have your postprocessing after the
>wait
>step in the other branch.
>Cheers
>Mike
>
>Hotmail wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > I am trying to terminate the workflow via a wait step for 'Posted' event
>in
> > FIPP. This is to make sure that if the users processed the invoices from
>the
> > outside the workflow, it would also complete the workflow. I have built
>a
> > check function module as part of posted event in instance linkages which
> > would check to see if the 'Posted' event occurs through posting from
> > workflow or outside the workflow.
> > If the posting occurs from workflow the event would not trigger thereby
> > making sure the workflow is completed.
> > Everything works fine if the 'Posting' is defined as a step within the
> > workflow and users processed that step. But instead of workflow step, if
>the
> > 'Posted' method is called via swc_call_method then the check function
>module
> > does not consider it as though it is triggered from workflow. This makes
>the
> > workflow as status 'logically deleted' where in fact it should really be
> > 'Completed'.
> > Is there a better way of checking to see if the posted event is raised
>in
> > the workflow either as a step or within the business object via call
>method
> > ?
> >
> > Swami Bala
> >
> >
 
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee.
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963