Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Agent Determination...

[Susan R. Keohan]

Hi Partha,
 
Don't know if this applies to you, but I seem to recall having trouble wi=
th the role simulation if I=20
had too many sessions open.  Try closing a few and see if you can at leas=
t get the popup now.  You=20
are probably not (in my expert opinion) losing your mind - yet.
 
Cheers,
Sue
 
Workflow99 at aol.com wrote:
 
> =20
> =20
> Hi Partha,
> =20
> Please post the entire source of your FM including the interface.
> =20
> =20
> Regards,
> Ramki Maley
> Workflow Developer,  USCBP.
> 248-613-1287 (C)
>=20
> =20
> In a message dated 7/29/2004 2:58:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, =20
> pchatterjee at DELOITTE.com writes:
>=20
> Hi  Serge,
>=20
> I have done various types of refreshes including what you  mentioned (I=
 will=20
> try changing the capitalization as you suggested).  I  am getting even=20
> stranger behavior now believe it or not.  Everytime I  simulate, the po=
pup just=20
> disappears without telling me the role has  failed.
>=20
> Very strange--thanks for your help though at least I am not  losing my =
mind,
> Partha
>=20
> -----Original  Message-----=20
>> From: SAP Workflow on behalf of  Serge Boulay=20
> Sent: Thu 7/29/2004 2:51 PM =20
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
> Cc:=20
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent  behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Age=
nt=20
> Determination function  module
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Hi Partha,
>=20
> A stupid one but  have you leave the PFAC transaction? Maybe not logged=
 out
> but just went back to the main SAP menu... It is annoying but it  appen=
d to
> me...
>=20
> Serge
>=20
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : SAP Workflow  [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] De la part de
> Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)
> Envoy=E9 : 29 juillet 2004 13:16
> =C0 :  SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Objet : Re: Inconsistent  behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Agen=
t
> Determination function module
>=20
> Hi Serge,
>=20
> Yes those are the  macros I used.  My code in the funciton module is be=
low:
>=20
> INCLUDE <CNTAIN>.
>=20
> DATA BEGIN OF ORG_OBJECT OCCURS 0.
>=20
> INCLUDE STRUCTURE SWHACTOR.
>=20
> DATA END OF ORG_OBJECT.
>=20
> DATA: ORG_TYPE LIKE  SWHACTOR-OTYPE.
>=20
> DATA: ORG_ID  LIKE SWHACTOR-OBJID.
>=20
> DATA:  RESULT_TAB LIKE SWHACTOR OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
>=20
> REFRESH: ACTOR_TAB, RESULT_TAB,  ORG_OBJECT.
>=20
> CLEAR: ACTOR_TAB,  RESULT_TAB, ORG_OBJECT.
>=20
> * Get  the parameters under consideration.
>=20
> SWC_GET_ELEMENT AC_CONTAINER 'plant' plant.
>=20
> SWC_GET_ELEMENT AC_CONTAINER 'logentrytype'  logentrytype.
>=20
> SWC_GET_ELEMENT  AC_CONTAINER 'eventdate' eventdate.
>=20
>=20
> * Get the position ids from role resolution.
>=20
> select * from ZSSE0017ROLETBL
>=20
> into corresponding fields of  result_tab
>=20
> where iaplant =3D  plant
>=20
> and iatype =3D  logentrytype
>=20
> and begda <=3D  eventdate
>=20
> and endda >=3D  eventdate.
>=20
> actor_tab-otype =3D  result_tab-otype.
>=20
> actor_tab-objid =3D result_tab-objid.
>=20
> append actor_tab.
>=20
> endselect.
>=20
> REFRESH:  AC_CONTAINER.
>=20
> CLEAR:  AC_CONTAINER.
>=20
> As you can see,  its pretty simple code.  I was playing around with con=
tainer
> refreshes thinking that that maybe the problem but I  don't think it is.
>=20
> Best  regards,
> Partha
>=20
> -----Original  Message-----
>> From:  SAP Workflow on behalf of Serge Boulay
> Sent: Thu 7/29/2004 2:09 PM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior between SAP  Rule and underlying
> Agent Determination  function module
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Hi  Partha,
>=20
> Do you use SWC_GET_ELEMENT  AC_CONTAINER... statement in you function
> module
> in order to  get these container elements into you function module
> variables?
>=20
> Best  regards.
>=20
> Serge
>=20
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : SAP Workflow  [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] De la part
> de
> Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)
> Envoy=E9 : 29 juillet 2004 12:37
> =C0 : SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Objet : Re: Inconsistent behavior  between SAP Rule and underlying
> Agent
> Determination function  module
>=20
> Hi Mike,
>=20
> I am not sure I understand your  terminology.
>=20
> On PFAC_DIS, I  click the simulate button (the abacus type symbol).
> At this
> point, I get a pop-up which allows me to enter my custom container
> elements
> (Plant, Event Date, and Incident Type which are from the  EH&S area).
> After
> enter the custom container elements, I  click the test button (wrench
> symbol) and get the problem I am speaking about.  If I run  the same
> test
> with the underlying function module under se37 it  works fine and I
> get the
> Agents I am expecting in  ACTOR_TAB.
>=20
> I am not sure what  the Org Management or the Extended Object ID have
> to do
> with  this?  So I guess answer to your question would be no as the
> parameters
> I am feeding the Rule do not have anything to with Org  Management.
>=20
> Best  regards,
> Partha
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SAP Workflow on behalf of Mike  Nickson
> Sent: Thu 7/29/2004 11:53 AM
> To:  SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent  behavior between SAP Rule and
> underlying
> Agent  Determination function module
>=20
>=20
>=20
> When you are simulating the rule  (presumably via PFAC) there
> are 2
> possible ways to supply the parameters.
>=20
> Either via - Org  Management Object =3D USBLOGGSF
>=20
> Or via - Extended Object ID =3D  BLOGGSF   &   Object Type =3D US
>=20
> Are  these the parameters youa re using ?
>=20
> Mike
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> "Chatterjee, Partha (US - San  Ramon)"
> <pchatterjee at DELOITTE.com>
> Sent by: SAP Workflow  <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> 29/07/2004 15:34
> Please respond to SAP Workflow Users' Group
>=20
>=20
> To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> cc:
> Subject:        Inconsistent behavior between  SAP
> Rule and
> underlying Agent Determination
> function  module
>=20
>=20
> Hi All,
>=20
> I have  developed a very simple rule that picks some agents
> from a
> custom
> table.  When I execute the function module  underlying the
> rule in
> test/debug, the  function module always behaves as expected
> returning
> the
> correct result to ACTOR_TAB.  However, if I simulate  the
> rule I get
> 'No
> Agent Found'.  I don't quite  understand what is happening
> between
> the
> two  places.  We are on 4.7 extension set 2.
>=20
> Has anyone run  into this type of problem before?  The only
> relevant
> note
> I can find is 707767 but it is hard to know from the  minimal
> problem
> description whether  its appropriate.
>=20
> Also, where is the place to search for  q&a's on this forum.
>=20
> Best regards,
>=20
>=20
>>Partha Chatterjee
>>
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> This  message (including any attachments) contains
> confidential
> information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and  is
> protected by
> law.
> If you are not the intended  recipient, you should delete
> this
> message. Any
> disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the
> taking
> of any
> action based on it, is strictly  prohibited.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> This message (including any attachments) contains  confidential
> information
> intended for a specific individual  and purpose, and is protected by
> law.   If
> you are not the  intended recipient, you should delete this message.
> Any
> disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking
> of any
> action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> This  message (including any attachments) contains confidential  inform=
ation
> intended for a specific individual  and purpose, and is protected by la=
w.  If
> you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.   A=
ny
> disclosure, copying, or distribution of  this message, or the taking of=
 any
> action based  on it, is strictly prohibited.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> This  message (including any attachments) contains confidential informa=
tion=20
> intended  for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by la=
w.  If=20
> you  are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  A=
ny =20
> disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of =
any  action=20
> based on it, is strictly prohibited.
>=20
 
--=20
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
keohan at ll.mit.edu