rswuwfmlec - no work items needed forwarding

[Stewart, Jim]

David, yes, thanks very much -- it helps to hear that someone else has faced
this before.
 
It does look like the attributes have been set, but still no email.  Also,
I'm executing this report directly using se80 - have you been able to get it
to work this way?
 
If there are any other gotcha or secret handshakes that you've found, I'd
love to join the club. :^) much appreciated.
 
Jim
 
________________________________________________
Jim Stewart
SAP EBP Workflow Consultant
o: 858.826.3619
m: 562.212.4312
mailto:frank.j.stewart at saic.com
mailto:jstewart at equitytechgroup.com
 
 -----Original Message-----
From:   SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]  On Behalf Of
Trant, David
Sent:   Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:12 PM
To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject:        Re: rswuwfmlec - no work items needed forwarding
 
Yes, there is indeed a secret handshake!  It took us a fair amount of
communication with SAP to get this worked out as well, as EBP does not use
the same automatic forwarding procedure as R/3.  You need to set the
attribute "Flag: Forward Work Item" (FORWARD_WI) to the value 'X' in
organizational maintenance in order to enable forwarding.  We chose to do
this at our highest organizational unit to make it a global setting, but you
can set it individually if desired.  We are on EBP 3.0 and use transaction
PPOMA_BBP.  I haven't used the CRM version, but I suspect it's over 90% the
same, as all the PPOxx transactions (PPOMW, PPOME, etc. in R/3) all do
pretty much the same thing, but tailor which objects are shown and how to
the presumed focus of the audience (workflow, HR, etc.).
 
I see you've already discovered RSWUWFMLEC, which is the EBP (or
CRM/SRM/WAS???) version of RSWUWFML.  One of the reasons for the "...EC"
version is to work with the above flag instead of the business workplace
office settings as is done in R/3 (in 4.6C, at least ... not sure about
WAS-based versions).
 
Hope this helps,
David
 
 -----Original Message-----
From:   SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]  On Behalf Of
Stewart, Jim
Sent:   Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:57 PM
To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject:        rswuwfmlec - no work items needed forwarding
 
 
Has anyone seen anything like the following -
 
###
Program RSWUWFMLEC
 
 
A Total of 26 Work Items Scanned.
 
No Work Items Found that Needed Forwarding.
 
###
 
We'd like notification emails to be sent to all users that have these sorts
of work items waiting for them (EBP shopping cart approvals) --
 
Is there something that we're missing in the setup?
 
According to SRM instructions, user attributes need to be set in PPOMA_CRM,
but we've been using PPOMA_BBP - is there a difference?
 
WF-BATCH has work item forwarding turned on.
 
Is there a secret handshake here?
 
THANKS!
 
Jim Stewart
 
________________________________________________
Jim Stewart
SAP EBP Workflow Consultant
o: 858.826.3619
m: 562.212.4312
mailto:frank.j.stewart at saic.com
mailto:jstewart at equitytechgroup.com
 
 -----Original Message-----
From:   SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]  On Behalf Of
Cooper, John M
Sent:   Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:21 PM
To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject:        Re: rswuwfml
 
John,
 
You do have to specify a job suffix.  The job suffix allows different
variants to be set up with different timings for certain tasks or other
parameters, and is used to set the last time run for that suffix.  If
you leave it blank then there is no last time run for it to check
against, and you get all work items.
 
John
 
-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of
John A Haworth
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 9:29 AM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: rswuwfml
 
 
Hi
 
Running the RSWUWFML report, in 4.6C, via a periodic job, it keeps
sending
notifications for the same workitems, it doesn't seem to pick up the
fact
that no new workitems have been created since the last run time. Is
there a
setting I am missing?
 
Many Thanks
 
John
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
 
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit
written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of
e-mail
for such purpose.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from
disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please
inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
printed copy.   Thank you.
 ===========================================================================
==
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
[mf2]